Debt Analysts' Views of Debt-Equity Conflicts of Interest
Debt Analysts' Views of Debt-Equity Conflicts of Interest
Debt Analysts' Views of Debt-Equity Conflicts of Interest
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
the number <strong>of</strong> covenants. Consistent with the agency theory <strong>of</strong> covenants, our results in Column<br />
3 show that the higher the number <strong>of</strong> covenants, the smaller the <strong>of</strong>fering yield. More importantly,<br />
the results confirm that allowing for endogeneity between the <strong>of</strong>fering yield and the number <strong>of</strong><br />
covenants does not affect our main conclusion that negative conflict discussions predict higher<br />
<strong>of</strong>fering yields.<br />
While we address the endogeneity between bond yields and covenants, our empirical<br />
analysis treats the rest <strong>of</strong> the bond contractual terms as exogenous. 32 As an untabulated<br />
robustness test, to address the joint determination <strong>of</strong> bond terms, we estimate the <strong>of</strong>fering yield,<br />
the number <strong>of</strong> covenants, maturity, and the <strong>of</strong>fering amount as a system <strong>of</strong> equations using a<br />
seemingly unrelated regression (SUR) model. SUR allows error terms in all four regressions to<br />
be correlated. Our findings are robust to the SUR estimation and our inferences remain the same.<br />
In sum, we document that the yield to maturity <strong>of</strong> new bonds increases with the negative<br />
tone <strong>of</strong> conflict discussions in debt analysts’ reports preceding the bond issuance, after<br />
controlling for a variety <strong>of</strong> firm and bond specific characteristics, debt and equity analysts’<br />
recommendations, and the occurrence <strong>of</strong> conflict events. These conflict-event discussions are<br />
hence associated with real effects on a company’s cost <strong>of</strong> debt.<br />
4.6. Alternative measure <strong>of</strong> debt analysts’ negative conflict discussions<br />
In this section, we develop and test an alternative measure <strong>of</strong> the tone <strong>of</strong> debt analysts’<br />
conflict discussions. This measure is based on the difference in the tone <strong>of</strong> conflict discussions<br />
between debt and equity analyst reports, which may more directly capture the idea <strong>of</strong> conflict<br />
between debt and equity investors.<br />
32 The regressions using debt contractual terms involve a variety <strong>of</strong> simultaneity and endogeneity problems, which<br />
makes it extremely difficult to find appropriate instruments (e.g., Bradley and Roberts, 2004; Costello and<br />
Wittenberg-Moerman, 2011). Further, it is practically infeasible to concurrently endogenize all bond contractual<br />
terms incorporated into the yield analysis.<br />
39