04.07.2013 Views

19.1 Payoff Tables and Decision Trees

19.1 Payoff Tables and Decision Trees

19.1 Payoff Tables and Decision Trees

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TABLE <strong>19.1</strong>5<br />

Bayes’ Theorem<br />

Calculations for the Stock<br />

Selection Example<br />

FIGURE 19.5<br />

<strong>Decision</strong> tree with joint<br />

probabilities for the stock<br />

selection example<br />

TABLE <strong>19.1</strong>6<br />

Expected Monetary<br />

Value, Using Revised<br />

Probabilities, for Each of<br />

Two Stocks Under Four<br />

Economic Conditions<br />

P (E 1 ) = .10<br />

P (E 2 ) = .40<br />

P (E 3 ) = .30<br />

P (E 4 ) = .20<br />

19.3 <strong>Decision</strong> Making with Sample Information 21<br />

Table <strong>19.1</strong>5 summarizes the computation of these probabilities. Figure 19.5 displays the joint<br />

probabilities in a decision tree. You need to use the revised probabilities, not the original<br />

subjective probabilities, to compute the expected monetary value. Table <strong>19.1</strong>6 shows these<br />

computations.<br />

Event, E i<br />

Prior<br />

Probability,<br />

P(E i)<br />

Conditional<br />

Probability,<br />

P(F 1|E i)<br />

Joint<br />

Probability<br />

P(F 1|E i)P(E i)<br />

P (E 1 <strong>and</strong> F 1 ) = P (F 1 |E 1 ) P (E 1 )<br />

= (.20) (.10) = .02<br />

P (E 1 <strong>and</strong> F 2 ) = P (F 2 |E 1 ) P (E 1 )<br />

= (.80) (.10) = .08<br />

P (E 2 <strong>and</strong> F 1 ) = P (F 1 |E 2 ) P (E 2 )<br />

= (.40) (.40) = .16<br />

P (E 2 <strong>and</strong> F 2 ) = P (F 2 |E 2 ) P (E 2 )<br />

= (.60) (.40) = .24<br />

P (E 3 <strong>and</strong> F 1 ) = P (F 1 |E 3 ) P (E 3 )<br />

= (.70) (.30) = .21<br />

P (E 3 <strong>and</strong> F 2 ) = P (F 2 |E 3 ) P (E 3 )<br />

= (.30) (.30) = .09<br />

P (E 4 <strong>and</strong> F 1 ) = P (F 1 |E 4 ) P (E 4 )<br />

= (.90) (.20) = .18<br />

P (E 4 <strong>and</strong> F 2 ) = P (F 2 |E 4 ) P (E 4 )<br />

= (.10) (.20) = .02<br />

Revised<br />

Probability,<br />

P(E i|F 1)<br />

Recession, E 1 0.10 0.20 0.02 0.02>0.57 = 0.035<br />

Stable economy, E 2 0.40 0.40 0.16 0.16>0.57 = 0.281<br />

Moderate growth, E 3 0.30 0.70 0.21 0.21>0.57 = 0.368<br />

Boom, E 4 0.20 0.90 0.18 0.18>0.57 = 0.316<br />

0.57<br />

Alternative Courses of Action<br />

Event Pi A XijPi B XijPi Recession 0.035 30 30(0.035) = 1.05 -50 -50(0.035) = -1.75<br />

Stable economy 0.281 70 70(0.281) = 19.67 30 30(0.281) = 8.43<br />

Moderate growth 0.368 100 100(0.368) = 36.80 250 250(0.368) = 92.00<br />

Boom 0.316 150 150(0.316) = 47.40 400 40010.3162 = 126.40<br />

EMV1A2 = 104.92 EMV1B2 = 225.08<br />

Thus, the expected monetary value, or profit, for stock A is $104.92, <strong>and</strong> the expected<br />

monetary value, or profit, for stock B is $225.08. Using this criterion, you should once again<br />

choose stock B because the expected monetary value is much higher for this stock. However,<br />

you should reexamine the return-to-risk ratios in light of these revised probabilities. Using

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!