Vulnerability and involvement in drug use and ... - Sex Work Europe
Vulnerability and involvement in drug use and ... - Sex Work Europe
Vulnerability and involvement in drug use and ... - Sex Work Europe
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
u n d e rtaken by the first <strong>and</strong> second authors of this re p o rt <strong>and</strong> conducted between April<br />
2001 <strong>and</strong> May 2002.<br />
The structured questionnaire comprised both common measures <strong>in</strong>cluded by other projects<br />
on the Vulnerable Groups <strong>and</strong> Problematic Drug Use Research Programme <strong>and</strong> measures<br />
specific to the <strong>Vulnerability</strong> <strong>and</strong> Involvement <strong>in</strong> Drug Use <strong>and</strong> <strong>Sex</strong> <strong>Work</strong> study. Four ma<strong>in</strong><br />
areas were covered <strong>in</strong> the questionnaire: (i) <strong>drug</strong> <strong>use</strong>; (ii) sex work; (iii) <strong>use</strong> of services; <strong>and</strong><br />
(iv) offend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>volvement</strong> <strong>in</strong> the crim<strong>in</strong>al justice system (see Appendix D). A pilot<br />
version of the questionnaire was prepared prior to fieldwork <strong>and</strong> ref<strong>in</strong>ed early on <strong>in</strong> this<br />
phase of the study. The qualitative <strong>in</strong>terview covered five ma<strong>in</strong> areas: (i) routes <strong>in</strong>to <strong>drug</strong> <strong>use</strong><br />
<strong>and</strong> sex work; (ii) l<strong>in</strong>ks between <strong>drug</strong> <strong>use</strong> <strong>and</strong> sex work; (iii) lifestyles associated with <strong>drug</strong><br />
<strong>use</strong> <strong>and</strong> sex work; (iv) <strong>use</strong> <strong>and</strong> experience of services (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g crim<strong>in</strong>al justice services);<br />
<strong>and</strong> (v) exit<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>drug</strong> <strong>use</strong> <strong>and</strong> sex work (where applicable).<br />
The <strong>in</strong>terview as a whole sought to yield both quantitative data <strong>and</strong> depth qualitative data.<br />
Quantitative data were obta<strong>in</strong>ed from participants’ responses to both closed <strong>and</strong> open-<br />
ended items on the stru c t u red questionnaire. Responses to open-ended questions were<br />
subject to content analysis <strong>and</strong> thereby transformed <strong>in</strong>to quantitative data. Qualitative data<br />
w e re gathered by means of depth <strong>in</strong>terview<strong>in</strong>g. The re s e a rchers aimed to elicit detailed<br />
accounts of participants’ experiences us<strong>in</strong>g open-ended questions, supplementary<br />
questions <strong>and</strong> prompts as appropriate. Interview guides were <strong>use</strong>d to check re s e a rc h e r s ’<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es of enquiry such that they sought broadly comparable <strong>in</strong>formation from each<br />
p a rticipant. However, <strong>in</strong>terviews were sufficiently flexible to allow data collection to flow<br />
<strong>in</strong>ductively thro u g h o u t .<br />
Data collected for this study were further complemented by data that had previously been<br />
collected for three other Home Office funded studies:<br />
● ‘Sell<strong>in</strong>g sex <strong>in</strong> the city: An evaluation of a targeted arrest referral scheme for sex<br />
workers <strong>in</strong> K<strong>in</strong>gs Cross’ (2001);<br />
● ‘For Love or Money: Pimp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> the management of sex work’ (2000); <strong>and</strong><br />
● ‘Street Bus<strong>in</strong>ess: The l<strong>in</strong>ks between sex <strong>and</strong> <strong>drug</strong> markets’ (1999).<br />
These three studies were conducted between 1998 <strong>and</strong> 2001 by re s e a rchers from the<br />
Crim<strong>in</strong>al Policy Research Unit at South Bank University, London. They yielded 158<br />
<strong>in</strong>terviews with sex workers. Their datasets were merged <strong>and</strong> new analyses conducted.<br />
Method<br />
19