19.07.2013 Views

Vulnerability and involvement in drug use and ... - Sex Work Europe

Vulnerability and involvement in drug use and ... - Sex Work Europe

Vulnerability and involvement in drug use and ... - Sex Work Europe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

or <strong>drug</strong> <strong>use</strong>rs <strong>and</strong> were there f o re sufficiently <strong>in</strong> touch with these services to hear about our study.<br />

A further two ‘non-service <strong>use</strong>rs’ were re c ruited via a churc h - run service for ‘needy people’.<br />

F rom their re p o rts, it appears that the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ten participants had not been <strong>in</strong> contact with any<br />

s e rvice where their <strong>drug</strong> <strong>use</strong> or sex work would have been automatically acknowledged <strong>in</strong> the six<br />

months before <strong>in</strong>terv i e w. It was clear from some of these participants that they specifically<br />

avoided specialist services for this very reason. They simply did not want to discuss their sex work<br />

or <strong>drug</strong> <strong>use</strong> with service providers. Some distrusted services or feared hav<strong>in</strong>g these details<br />

re c o rded <strong>in</strong> case notes about them. Others dissociated themselves from the majority us<strong>in</strong>g cert a i n<br />

s e rvices <strong>and</strong> felt these services were there f o re ‘not for them’. Seven of these participants had<br />

nonetheless had a sexual health check with<strong>in</strong> the last six months. This pro p o rtion is roughly the<br />

same as that re p o rted below for participants us<strong>in</strong>g services for <strong>drug</strong> <strong>use</strong>rs <strong>and</strong>/or sex workers.<br />

Two of the ten ‘not <strong>in</strong> touch with services’ participants were women work<strong>in</strong>g outdoors. They<br />

w e re aged 21 <strong>and</strong> 24. The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g eight were men. Their ages ranged from 18 to 25.<br />

One worked outdoors or contacted clients <strong>in</strong> pubs. Another worked <strong>in</strong> a flat. The re m a i n i n g<br />

six were <strong>in</strong>dependent entre p reneurs contact<strong>in</strong>g clients via the <strong>in</strong>ternet or press adverts. Seven<br />

of these ten participants shared another dist<strong>in</strong>guish<strong>in</strong>g characteristic that was apparent fro m<br />

depth <strong>in</strong>terviews. These were highly articulate <strong>in</strong>dividuals. They all had experience of furt h e r<br />

or higher education <strong>and</strong> either dist<strong>in</strong>guished themselves from other sex workers <strong>and</strong>/or<br />

p roblematic <strong>drug</strong> <strong>use</strong>rs or spoke strongly <strong>in</strong> favour of sex worker rights issues.<br />

Service impact on sexual health<br />

Promot<strong>in</strong>g sexual health has been a dom<strong>in</strong>ant aim of services for sex workers. S<strong>in</strong>ce the<br />

orig<strong>in</strong>al focus on service <strong>use</strong> was to learn about exit<strong>in</strong>g experiences rather than their impact<br />

on participants’ health there is little data on this. The only <strong>in</strong>formation on sexual health<br />

comes from quantitative data on most recent sexual health check <strong>and</strong> number of diagnoses<br />

of sexually transmitted <strong>in</strong>fections. This provides very limited <strong>in</strong>formation on sexual health<br />

<strong>and</strong> as with all self-report data it is unlikely to be accurate.<br />

Relationships between the participants’ <strong>use</strong> of <strong>drug</strong> services or services for sex workers <strong>and</strong><br />

their sexual health were exam<strong>in</strong>ed. Thre e - q u a rters (n=73; 76%) of participants us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

services for <strong>drug</strong> <strong>use</strong>rs <strong>and</strong>/or sex workers <strong>in</strong> the last six months reported hav<strong>in</strong>g a sexual<br />

health check <strong>in</strong> this time, compared with half (n=13; 48%) of those not us<strong>in</strong>g services <strong>in</strong> the<br />

last six months. (This association was statistically significant) 4 .<br />

4 See Appendix A – Statpo<strong>in</strong>t 4.<br />

Services<br />

49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!