Vulnerability and involvement in drug use and ... - Sex Work Europe
Vulnerability and involvement in drug use and ... - Sex Work Europe
Vulnerability and involvement in drug use and ... - Sex Work Europe
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4 Problematic <strong>drug</strong> <strong>use</strong> <strong>and</strong> sex work<br />
Qualitative <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong>to ‘shared environment’ as potential explanation for relationships<br />
between problematic <strong>drug</strong> <strong>use</strong> <strong>and</strong> sex work<br />
In Chapter three, statistically significant relationships were shown between vulnerability<br />
factors. In order to explore how <strong>and</strong> why these factors might be related to each other,<br />
qualitative data from participants’ accounts of relationships between ‘vulnerability’<br />
experiences were exam<strong>in</strong>ed. Noticeable was the emphasis participants made <strong>in</strong> describ<strong>in</strong>g<br />
access to various environments or sett<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> their explanations of the l<strong>in</strong>ks between<br />
vulnerability experiences. For example, problematic <strong>drug</strong> <strong>use</strong> was l<strong>in</strong>ked to homelessness<br />
through outdoor sex work beca<strong>use</strong> all of these shared environmental space on the streets<br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> the deal<strong>in</strong>g ho<strong>use</strong>s which serve as sex markets, <strong>drug</strong> markets <strong>and</strong> areas where<br />
homeless people congregate. Similarly, prostitution under 18 was l<strong>in</strong>ked to be<strong>in</strong>g ‘looked<br />
after’ <strong>and</strong> work<strong>in</strong>g outdoors beca<strong>use</strong> outdoor sex markets were open to all ‘<strong>in</strong>tro d u c i n g<br />
friends’. ‘Introduc<strong>in</strong>g friends’ were often themselves young <strong>and</strong> ‘looked after’ or sometimes<br />
m o re ‘pre d a t o ry’ adults. Either way, these <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g friends avoided scrut<strong>in</strong>y fro m<br />
gatekeepers such as brothel owners or sauna managers by <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g novice prostitutes to<br />
outdoor sex markets. This ‘shared environment as opportunity’ explanation was scrut<strong>in</strong>ised<br />
by match<strong>in</strong>g participants’ experiences of vulnerability factors with their ma<strong>in</strong> sex work sector<br />
<strong>and</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs from these analyses are presented <strong>in</strong> full below. In short, it was found that<br />
early experience of ‘hard <strong>drug</strong>s’, problematic <strong>drug</strong> <strong>use</strong>, prostitution under age 18, hav<strong>in</strong>g<br />
convictions, experience of be<strong>in</strong>g ‘looked after’ <strong>and</strong> experience of homelessness or <strong>in</strong>secure<br />
hous<strong>in</strong>g all concentrated amongst those who had ma<strong>in</strong>ly worked outdoors or as<br />
<strong>in</strong>dependent drifters.<br />
Quantitative evidence on ‘shared environment’ as explanation for relationships between<br />
problematic <strong>drug</strong> <strong>use</strong> <strong>and</strong> sex work<br />
Ma<strong>in</strong> sex work sector by age of first ‘hard <strong>drug</strong>’ <strong>use</strong><br />
The mean age of first ‘hard <strong>drug</strong>’ <strong>use</strong> among participants who had worked ma<strong>in</strong>ly outdoors<br />
or as <strong>in</strong>dependent drifters s<strong>in</strong>ce start<strong>in</strong>g sex work was one <strong>and</strong> a half years lower than that<br />
among those who had worked ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>door associated or <strong>in</strong>dependent entrepreneurial<br />
sectors (15.8 <strong>and</strong> 17.3 years, respectively). This difference was statistically significant.<br />
31