computing lives - FTP Directory Listing
computing lives - FTP Directory Listing
computing lives - FTP Directory Listing
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A<br />
Computer Previous Page | Contents | Zoom in | Zoom out | Front Cover | Search Issue | Next Page M S BE<br />
aG<br />
F<br />
technology’s introduction in 2003. This data is significant<br />
because SATA is the predominant drive technology used<br />
in desktop and nearline systems.<br />
Most organizations use financial models as only one data<br />
point in deciding whether to buy or lease an asset. Other<br />
factors also influence their decision. 7 However, our proposed<br />
model bridges a critical gap in the literature and, more<br />
importantly, the market. Our model helps users understand<br />
the premium they’re paying for what seems to be an arbitrarily<br />
priced online storage market. Our research agenda<br />
aims to provide a quantitative framework for rationally reasoning<br />
about the cost of leasing infrastructure from cloud<br />
services, and extends our prior work on leasing from compute<br />
clouds. 10 Importantly, the systematic understanding of<br />
the real cost of leasing assets from cloud services lets users<br />
make rational decisions with innovative pricing structures.<br />
This promotes market transparency and ultimately supports<br />
a competitive product market.<br />
PRELIMINARIES<br />
A key principle in economic finance is the time value<br />
of money. Basically, this principle states that an investor<br />
always prefers to receive some fixed amount of money<br />
today rather than in the future. Hence, when making<br />
buy-or-lease decisions, investors often compare future<br />
cash flows in an investment over time, discounted to their<br />
present value by some interest rate. 5-7 The discounting<br />
interest rate used reflects the risk involved in raising the<br />
capital needed to invest.<br />
In equation form, the simplified standard capitalbudgeting<br />
format for calculating a purchased asset’s net<br />
present value (NPV) is as follows:<br />
NPV P =<br />
N<br />
<br />
T = 0<br />
P P C T T<br />
(1+ I ) K T<br />
S<br />
+ E , N (1+ I ) K<br />
where P is the annual profit resulting from the purchased<br />
T<br />
P asset in year T; C is the asset’s expected annual operat-<br />
T<br />
ing cost at year T; I is the firm’s cost of capital, defined<br />
K<br />
as the interest rate of its outstanding debt used to finance<br />
the purchase; 11 N is the asset’s productive life in years; S is<br />
the asset’s salvage value after N years; and E is the asset’s<br />
purchase (capital) cost.<br />
Similarly, the equation for calculating a leased asset’s<br />
NPV is as follows:<br />
NPV L =<br />
L P C T T<br />
( ) T<br />
N<br />
<br />
T = 0<br />
1+ I K<br />
<br />
LT ( ) T<br />
N<br />
<br />
T = 0<br />
1+ I R<br />
L where C is the leased asset’s expected annual operat-<br />
T<br />
ing cost at year T; L is the lease payment at year T; and<br />
T<br />
I is the interest rate for financing the lease payments. In<br />
R<br />
this formulation, the lease’s financing rate is generally<br />
regarded as smaller than the cost of capital, I , because of<br />
K<br />
,<br />
Table 1. Parameter terms in the buy-or-lease decision model.<br />
Term Description<br />
Cost of electric utility ($/kilowatt hour)<br />
Size of purchased disk drives (Gbytes)<br />
Proportional difierence between human efiort in main -<br />
taining a purchased versus a leased storage infrastructure<br />
ϒ Used disk depreciation factor on salvage ([0.0, 1.0])<br />
C Disk controller unit cost ($)<br />
H Annual human operator salary ($)<br />
T<br />
I Risk-free interest rate (percent)<br />
F<br />
Κ Current per-Gbyte storage price ($/Gbyte)<br />
LT Pc PD VT Expected annual per-Gbyte lease payment ($/Gbyte/year)<br />
Disk controller power consumption (kW)<br />
Disk drive power consumption (kW)<br />
Expected storage requirement in year T (Gbytes)<br />
the involved payment structure’s predictability. 5<br />
With this NPV formulation for asset purchase and lease,<br />
investors can make the buy-or-lease decision using the<br />
following criteria: If the incremental NPV (NPV) 0 <br />
buy; if NPV < 0 lease, where NPV = NPV P – NPV L .<br />
DECISION MODEL<br />
We derive a buy-or-lease decision model that calculates<br />
the comparative NPVs from storage purchase versus<br />
lease. Our model accounts for the expected capital expenditure<br />
from SATA hard disk drive purchase, replacement,<br />
and end-of-use salvage. It also accounts for the expected<br />
operational expenditure for utility consumption and<br />
human operator cost. The “Derivation of the Decision<br />
Model” sidebar describes how we derived our decision<br />
model. We summarize it as follows: If NPV 0 buy; if<br />
NPV < 0 lease, where<br />
C − E + L T T T<br />
ΔNPV =<br />
( 1+ I F ) T<br />
N<br />
S<br />
∑<br />
+ − C<br />
N<br />
T = 0<br />
( 1+ I F )<br />
S =γ ∗ Ω∗⎡⎢ V ⎤ ∗ K ∗e T ⎥Ω −0.438T<br />
C =−ρ∗H − 365 ∗24<br />
T T ( ⎡⎢ ⎤⎥Ω )<br />
( )∗δ ∗ P + P ∗ V C D T<br />
( ⎡⎢ ⎤ − ⎡⎢ V ⎤ ⎥Ω T −1 ⎥Ω )∗Ω∗K ∗e −0.438T<br />
E T = 1.03∗ V T<br />
Table 1 lists the model parameters. We assume ⎡V⎤ fl is<br />
an operator returning the minimum number of fl-sized<br />
disk drives needed to store V Gbytes of data. The derived<br />
terms S, C T , and E T represent the expected end-of-life disk<br />
salvage value, the operating cost in year T, and the capital<br />
cost in year T, respectively.<br />
EXAMPLE APPLICATION<br />
We used our decision model to evaluate the advantages<br />
of purchasing versus leasing storage from a hypothetical<br />
storage cloud vendor.<br />
.<br />
APRIL 2010<br />
A<br />
Computer Previous Page | Contents | Zoom in | Zoom out | Front Cover | Search Issue | Next Page M S BE<br />
aG<br />
F<br />
(1)<br />
45