Constant, D., Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. (1994). What is mine is ours, or is it? Information Systems Research, 5(4), 400-422. Davenport T., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What they Know, Cambridge:Harvard Business School Press. Field, J. (2001). Lifelong education. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 20(1/2), 3-15. Fischer, G. (2001). Lifelong Learning and its support with new media. International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Discipline “Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Science”, Section Editor: W. Kintsch, Contribution No 41, Retrieved June 7, <strong>2007</strong>, from, http://l3d.cs.colorado.edu/~gerhard/papers/iesbs2001.pdf. Fischer, G., & Ostwald, J. (2002). Transcending the information given: designing learning environments for informed participation. Paper presented at the International Conference on Computers in Education, December 3-6, 2002, Auckland, New Zealand. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties, American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1973, 1360-1380. Gottschalk, K., & Graham, S. (2002). Introduction to Web Services Architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 41(2), 178- 198. Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In A. R. Kaye (Ed.), Collaborative learning through computer conferencing (pp. 117-136), Berlin: Springer. Hummel, H., Burgos, D., Tattersall, C., Brouns, F., Kurvers, H., & Koper, R. (2005a). Encouraging constributions in learning networks using incentive mechanisms. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 355-365. Hummel, H., Tattersall, C., Burgos, D., Brouns, F., Kurvers, H., & Koper, R. (2005b). Facilitating participation: From the EML website to the Learning Network for Learning Design. Interactive Learning Environments, 13(1-2), 55-69. IMS-LD (2003). IMS Learning Design Specification, Retrieved June 27, <strong>2007</strong>, from, http://www.imsglobal.org/ learningdesign/index.cfm. Klamma, R., Spaniol, M., Cao, Y., & Jarke, M. (2006). Pattern-Based Cross Media Social Network Analysis for <strong>Technology</strong> Enhanced Learning in Europe. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4227, 242-256. Koper, R., Giesbers, B., Van Rosmalen, P., Sloep, P., Van Bruggen, J., Tattersall, C., Vogten, H., & Brouns, F. (2005). A Design Model for Lifelong Learning Networks. Interactive Learning Environments, 13(1-2), 71-92. Kravcik, M., Specht, M., & Oppermann, R. (2004a): Evaluation of WINDS Authoring Environment. In De Bra, P. & Nejdl, W. (Eds.), Proc. of Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems (pp. 166-175), Berlin: Springer. Kravcik, M., Kaibel, A., Specht, M., & Terrenghi, L. (2004b). Mobile Collector for Field Trips. <strong>Educational</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> & <strong>Society</strong>, 7(2), 25-33. Kravcik, M., & Specht, M. (2005). Experience with WINDS Virtual University. In P. Kommers & G. Richards (Eds.), Proc. of the ED-MEDIA 2005 Conference, Montreal, 642-649. Kumar, R., Novak, J., Raghavan, P., & Tomkins, A. (2004). Structure and Evolution of Blogspace, Communications of the ACM, 47(12), 35-39. Latour, B. (1999). On Recalling ANT. In Law, J. & Hassard, J. (Eds.), Actor-Network Theory and After (pp. 15–25). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 81
Law, E. L.-C., & Hvannberg, E. T. (<strong>2007</strong>). Quality Models of Online Learning Community Systems: Exploration, Evaluation and Exploitation. In Lambropoulous, N. & Zaphiris, P. (Eds.), User-Centred Design of On-line Learning Communities (pp. 71-<strong>10</strong>1), Hershey: Idea Publishing. Licklider, J. C. R., Taylor, R., & Herbert, E. (1968). The Computer as a Communication Device. Science and <strong>Technology</strong>, 4, Retrieved June 27, <strong>2007</strong>, from, http://gatekeeper.dec.com/pub/DEC/SRC/publications/taylor/ licklider-taylor.pdf. Naeve, A. (2001a). The Knowledge Manifold - an <strong>Educational</strong> Architecture that Supports Inquiry-Based Customizable Forms of E-learning. Proceedings of the 2nd European Web-based Learning Environments Conference (WBLE 2001), October 24-26, Lund, Sweden, 200-212. Naeve, A. (2001b). The Concept Browser - a New Form of Knowledge Management Tool. Proceedings of the 2nd European Web-Based Learning Environment Conference (WBLE 2001), October 24-26, Lund, Sweden, 151-161. Naeve, A. (2005). The Human Semantic Web – Shifting from Knowledge Push to Knowledge Pull. International Journal of Semantic Web and Information Systems, 1(3), 1-30. Najjar, J., Meire, M., & Duval, E. (2005). Attention Metadata Management: Tracking the use of Learning Objects through AttentionXML. In Kommers, P. and Richards, G. (Eds.), Proceedings of EDMEDIA05, Chesapeake, VA: AACE, 1157-1161. Nilsson, M., Palmér, M., & Naeve, A. (2002). Semantic Web Meta-data for e-Learning - Some Architectural Guidelines. Paper presented at the 11 th World Wide Web Conference (WWW2002), May 7-11, Hawaii. Nejdl. W., Wolf, B., Qu, C., Decker, S., Sintek, M., Naeve, A., Nilsson, M., Palmér, M., & Risch, T. (2002). Edutella: A P2P Networking Infrastructure Based on RDF. Paper presented at the 11 th World Wide Web Conference (WWW2002), May 7-11, Hawaii. Naeve, A., Nilsson, M., Palmér M., & Paulsson, F. (2005). Contributions to a Public e-Learning Platform – Infrastructure, Architecture, Frameworks and Tools. International Journal of Learning <strong>Technology</strong>, 1(3), 352-381. Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2000). Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 139-178. O’Reilly, T. (2005). What Is Web 2.0 - Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software, Retrieved June 3, <strong>2007</strong>, from, http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html. Palmér, M., Naeve, A., & Paulsson, F. (2004). The SCAM-framework – helping applications to store and access metadata on the semantic web. Paper presented at the First European Semantic Web Symposium (ESWC 2004), May <strong>10</strong>-12, 2004, Heraklion, Greece. Palmér, M., & Naeve, A. (2005). Conzilla – a Conceptual Interface to the Semantic Web. In Dau, F., Mugnier, M.- L., Stumme, G. (Eds.), Conceptual Structures: Common Semantics for Sharing Knowledge (pp. 136-151), Berlin: Springer. Paternó, F., & Santoro, C. (in press). Remote usability evaluation: Discussion of a general framework and experiences from research with a specific tool. In Law, E., Hvannberg, E. & Cockton, G. (Eds.), Maturing usability: Quality in software, interaction and value, London: Springer. Preece, J. (2001). Sociability and usability in online communities: determining and measuring success. Behaviour and Information <strong>Technology</strong>, 29(5), 347-356. Robson, C. (2003). Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers, London: Blackwell Publishers Sawyer, S., Eschenfelder, K., & Hexkman, R. (2000). Knowledge markets: cooperation among distributed technical specialists. In T. Srikantaiah & M. Koenig (Eds.), Knowledge management for the information professional (pp. 181- 204), Medford, NJ: Information Today. 82
- Page 1 and 2:
July 2007 Volume 10 Number 3
- Page 3 and 4:
Advertisements Educational Technolo
- Page 5 and 6:
Distinguishing between games and si
- Page 7 and 8:
“sometimes” is less demanding t
- Page 9 and 10:
Figure 2. From generic skill to lea
- Page 11 and 12:
The large window on the left presen
- Page 13 and 14:
define competencies of individual a
- Page 15 and 16:
competency is composed of a single
- Page 17 and 18:
Generic Skills Classes 1 2 3 Receiv
- Page 19 and 20:
Figure 6. Extension of the competen
- Page 21 and 22:
Competency scale By combining the g
- Page 23 and 24:
activities, and resources present i
- Page 25 and 26:
Conclusion The importance given to
- Page 27 and 28:
Ainsworth, S. (2007). Using a Singl
- Page 29 and 30:
different instruction. For example,
- Page 31 and 32:
Author-focused studies Studies 1 an
- Page 33 and 34:
egression showed that students were
- Page 35 and 36: REDEEM is now a senior citizen in t
- Page 37 and 38: Chieu, V. M. (2007). An Operational
- Page 39 and 40: When students discuss with peers, t
- Page 41 and 42: COFALE as a learning environment an
- Page 43 and 44: COFALE supports a set of predefined
- Page 45 and 46: Tom is asked to prepare a list of g
- Page 47 and 48: 45-minute-long lecture and 2-hour-l
- Page 49 and 50: as an easy-to-use technological mea
- Page 51 and 52: Spiro, R. J., & Jehng, J. C. (1990)
- Page 53 and 54: learning settings. However, such a
- Page 55 and 56: introduced in the LOCO-Cite ontolog
- Page 57 and 58: ‘virtual subsection’) of the LO
- Page 59 and 60: Accordingly, TANGRAM provides stude
- Page 61 and 62: learning environment is to define t
- Page 63 and 64: Acknowledgment This work is support
- Page 65 and 66: Dron, J. (2007). Designing the Unde
- Page 67 and 68: wikis and blogs (or at least, colle
- Page 69 and 70: The darker side of social software
- Page 71 and 72: for the beetles, whose guts act as
- Page 73 and 74: The principle of sociability The pr
- Page 75 and 76: Bonabeau, E., Dorigo, M., & Theraul
- Page 77 and 78: Klamma, R., Chatti, M. A., Duval, E
- Page 79 and 80: We perceive adaptivity and personal
- Page 81 and 82: Mixed-method evaluation approach tr
- Page 83 and 84: Garden of Knowledge - with a commun
- Page 85: equirements for collaborative adapt
- Page 89 and 90: Wang, T. I., Tsai, K. H., Lee, M. C
- Page 91 and 92: 2.3 Recommendation Model Survey In
- Page 93 and 94: Figure 1. The portion of the concep
- Page 95 and 96: STEP4: Associated with concepts in
- Page 97 and 98: A modified TF-IDF approach is used
- Page 99 and 100: P(CK j x LOM ) = k NW max ∀ T∈
- Page 101 and 102: 4.2.2 Correlation-based algorithm I
- Page 103 and 104: content feedback, it can be intuiti
- Page 105 and 106: 66% improvement in average, and, wh
- Page 107 and 108: (a) (b) (c) Figure 10. Comparisons
- Page 109 and 110: index.aspx. ADL-2 (2001). Advanced
- Page 111 and 112: Wolpers, M., Najjar, J., Verbert, K
- Page 113 and 114: activity is taking place. For examp
- Page 115 and 116: Figure 2: The CAM schema elements (
- Page 117 and 118: • Context: the context element ca
- Page 119 and 120: 4.1 Generation of Attention Metadat
- Page 121 and 122: addition, such keywords can be extr
- Page 123 and 124: Action related data, data about sea
- Page 125 and 126: Braun, S., & Schmidt, A. (2006). Do
- Page 127 and 128: El-Bishouty, M. M., Ogata, H., & Ya
- Page 129 and 130: collaboration (Ogata, et al., 1999)
- Page 131 and 132: In case of LOI value is equal or cl
- Page 133 and 134: Also, the learner can click on an e
- Page 135 and 136: System Evaluation An experiment was
- Page 137 and 138:
In the fifth phase, 89% of the stud
- Page 139 and 140:
Fischer, G., & Konomi, S. (2005). I
- Page 141 and 142:
application for specific needs, whi
- Page 143 and 144:
(4) Multimedia: The truth is that e
- Page 145 and 146:
Program Company Price OS 6 eZediaMX
- Page 147 and 148:
Program Text editor Text import for
- Page 149 and 150:
Program Sound Formats Image Formats
- Page 151 and 152:
Program Image Painting Export Scrip
- Page 153 and 154:
Program Effects Needs player 5 Easy
- Page 155 and 156:
Program WYSIWYG Design Interactivit
- Page 157 and 158:
the grades awarded to the programs
- Page 159 and 160:
Grade Image formats Sound formats V
- Page 161 and 162:
Figure 3. Adequacy of image formats
- Page 163 and 164:
Animating objects, pictures, etc.,
- Page 165 and 166:
Educational overview Having taken m
- Page 167 and 168:
In summary, the final outcome is th
- Page 169 and 170:
Developing the Interactivity Survey
- Page 171 and 172:
technique. be treated as a desired
- Page 173 and 174:
55. A lecture in which student lear
- Page 175 and 176:
specific conclusions that researche
- Page 177 and 178:
Discussion and conclusion Although
- Page 179 and 180:
Juwah, C. (2003). Using peer assess
- Page 181 and 182:
Publish results Set a few goals for
- Page 183 and 184:
familiarity with computer terms, ex
- Page 185 and 186:
provide a framework for the integra
- Page 187 and 188:
tool themselves, and then gauge its
- Page 189 and 190:
associated with the effective use o
- Page 191 and 192:
portrayed as even more time-consumi
- Page 193 and 194:
Clarke, B. (2001). Corporate curric
- Page 195 and 196:
Neal, E. (1998). Using technology i
- Page 197 and 198:
Yearwood, J., & Stranieri, A. (2007
- Page 199 and 200:
entertaining (Neuhauser 1993). The
- Page 201 and 202:
in being addressed with the sequent
- Page 203 and 204:
The GAAM represents reasoning to a
- Page 205 and 206:
Other situations have more serious
- Page 207 and 208:
Figure 6. NARRATE phase screen afte
- Page 209 and 210:
The narration at Step 10 informs th
- Page 211 and 212:
very large degree of free-will has
- Page 213 and 214:
Rumelhart, D. E. (1975). Notes on a
- Page 215 and 216:
The School of Business at Universit
- Page 217 and 218:
Authentic assessment and OBOW exams
- Page 219 and 220:
iii. The assessment asks the studen
- Page 221 and 222:
world problems in relation to the s
- Page 223 and 224:
Herrington, J., & Herrington, A. (1
- Page 225 and 226:
services required by most clients i
- Page 227 and 228:
Wisdom. J. P., White, N., Goldsmith
- Page 229 and 230:
Work outside the U.S. has also prom
- Page 231 and 232:
of the Telecommunication Act, and t
- Page 233 and 234:
Parent-advocate respondents also re
- Page 235 and 236:
school administrators may be persua
- Page 237 and 238:
of legal requirements for accessibl
- Page 239 and 240:
Thus, while we have reason to belie
- Page 241 and 242:
underlying structure of the two pri
- Page 243 and 244:
still not familiar with its use; in
- Page 245 and 246:
Table 3: An Analysis of Different V
- Page 247 and 248:
of males. Secondly, as far as age w
- Page 249 and 250:
Conclusion This study examined the
- Page 251 and 252:
Sandholtz, J. H., Ringstaff, C., &
- Page 253 and 254:
The design and validation of a text
- Page 255 and 256:
Predetermined goal of a game The pr
- Page 257 and 258:
A true, precise and valid model “
- Page 259 and 260:
Bain, C., & Newton, C. (2003). Art
- Page 261 and 262:
Prensky, M. (2005). Adopt and Adapt
- Page 263 and 264:
opportunities based on studying dif
- Page 265 and 266:
The game -called Chase the Cheese-
- Page 267 and 268:
another token. Other tokens further
- Page 269 and 270:
The system is organized in differen
- Page 271 and 272:
“to produce a single product or p
- Page 273 and 274:
(e.g., cheese) or loses the game (a
- Page 275 and 276:
collaboration is not an easy task.
- Page 277 and 278:
Collazos, C., Ortega, M., Bravo, C.
- Page 279 and 280:
Soller, A., & Lesgold, A. (2000). K
- Page 281 and 282:
Is the usual hierarchical organizat
- Page 283 and 284:
The final step 7 in the procedure i
- Page 285 and 286:
This methodology is summarised in F
- Page 287 and 288:
‘IsBasisOf’, ‘HasConstraint
- Page 289 and 290:
The presented results are a reflect
- Page 291 and 292:
‘HasExample’, and ‘HasFurther
- Page 293 and 294:
DCMI (2003). DCMI Metadata Terms, R
- Page 295 and 296:
Literature review Astronomy educati
- Page 297 and 298:
Systems of type I provide different
- Page 299 and 300:
night. To prevent students from get
- Page 301 and 302:
Figures 2-5 display screenshots of
- Page 303 and 304:
Results of the study reveal the imp
- Page 305 and 306:
vertical axis leads to the disappea
- Page 307 and 308:
Dede, C., Salzman, M., Loftin, R. B
- Page 309 and 310:
Trumper, R. (2000). University stud
- Page 311 and 312:
ased on pre-defined adaptation rule
- Page 313 and 314:
Therefore, the higher-level items o
- Page 315 and 316:
common prefix with the existing pa
- Page 317 and 318:
later should be omitted (presented
- Page 319 and 320:
5.1 The Average Length of each Sequ
- Page 321 and 322:
Recall 6. Discussion 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.
- Page 323 and 324:
easily take lessons in a good learn
- Page 325 and 326:
Laborda, J. G., & Royo, T. M. (2007
- Page 327 and 328:
Chapter 8, Online reference tools,
- Page 329 and 330:
Kenyon, D. M., & Malabonga, V. (200
- Page 331 and 332:
and concise manner (e.g. Weeding =
- Page 333:
stream are chapters 7 and 8 which f