28.07.2013 Views

When Victims Rule (pdf)

When Victims Rule (pdf)

When Victims Rule (pdf)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MODERN ART<br />

insisted that critics of the painting were being culturally intolerant, that the animal<br />

feces that decorated it was really a fertility symbol.)<br />

The Saatchi show was formulated and first exhibited at the Royal Academy<br />

in London; that venue is also headed by a Jew: Norman Rosenthal. For another<br />

Rosenthal exhibition, after Sensation, the Times of London noted that the<br />

“curators of the Royal Academy insisted yesterday that hardcore porn<br />

and images of mutilation by contemporary artists were comparable to<br />

the Old Masters. They likened a sado-masochistic video to Michelangelo<br />

and Renaissance drawings, a pile of rubbish to the 16th-century<br />

painter Giuseppe Arcimboldo, and an assemblage of mutilated toy soldiers<br />

to another 16th-century master, Pieter Breughel the Elder. Norman<br />

Rosenthal, exhibitions secretary of the 237-year-old institution,<br />

and his colleague, Max Wigram, defended the latest objects to fill Burlington<br />

House - a sequel to the 1997 Sensation show - against suggestions<br />

that they could not be described as art. Walking round the Apocalypse<br />

exhibition yesterday before it opens to the public on Saturday, they repeatedly<br />

drew comparisons with the Old Masters … Mr Rosenthal was<br />

unable fully to explain how it differed from pornography screened in<br />

any Soho sex shop: ‘I don’t see porn videos in Soho. This is about men<br />

and women. It is a very Existentialist work of art, like a very beautiful<br />

drawing.’” [ALBERGE, D., 9-20-00]<br />

London’s Daily Telegraph complained that at this same Royal Academy<br />

show, Apocalypse, “its organizer Norman Rosenthal … basks amidst a freak<br />

show almost wholly devoid of authentic art.” [JOHNSON, D., 9-20-00] Or, as<br />

London’s Guardian noted:<br />

1570<br />

“The Royal Academy is a perverse British institution, and Norman<br />

Rosenthal is a perverse institutional figure. You can’t imagine him anywhere<br />

else. The [London art gallery] Tate would never have put on Sensation!,<br />

the exhibition of Charles Saatchi’s collection the Academy<br />

mounted in 1997: how could the Tate have allowed Saatchi to stamp<br />

himself on history in that way? But Rosenthal had no qualms about importing<br />

all this stuff into the sacred halls of Burlington House, and for<br />

many Sensation! is the defining exhibition of young British art, not only<br />

here but in America. In his office is a framed front page of the New York<br />

Post leading with mayor Giuliani’s attempt to ban the show last year. ‘I<br />

was at the opening (at the Brooklyn Museum). All the glamorous people<br />

were there. But, he says, no protesters at all. ‘I was almost disappointed.<br />

The whole thing took place not in real people’s experience but in the cliches<br />

of politicians and journalists. That’s so boring. Art is beyond that.’<br />

This denial of a desire to create a stir is frankly unbelievable. Rosenthal<br />

is the epitome of the art curator as showman … Rosenthal’s shows have<br />

helped to define British culture now, making the exhibition a phenomenon,<br />

a public ritual … Since he became exhibitions secretary more than<br />

20 years ago, Rosenthal has turned the Royal Academy into a venue for

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!