28.07.2013 Views

When Victims Rule (pdf)

When Victims Rule (pdf)

When Victims Rule (pdf)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE ACCUSATION OF ANTI-SEMITISM (PT. 2)<br />

illusionary definition of the self, the identification with the reference<br />

group’s mirage of the Other, is contaminated by protean variables existing<br />

within what seems to the outsider to be the homogeneous group in<br />

power.” [GILMAN]<br />

This leads inexorably to the conclusion that Jews need accept no blame for<br />

anything, even their own concepts of themselves. This “Alien Gentile in Jewish<br />

Brain” is stock-in-trade in Jewish circles. Michael Lerner, editor of the leftist<br />

Jewish journal, Tikkun, claims that “Jews have been victims of ‘internalized<br />

oppression,’ taking the viewpoint of those who disdain them and making it<br />

their own.” [LERNER, p. 5] Based on a foundation of Freudian psycho-babble,<br />

Barbara Breitman blames non-Jews for endemic Jewish neurosis, outrageously<br />

lifting blame from Jews for even their own thinking. The following is a classic<br />

example of twisted Jewish “<strong>Victims</strong>peak,” a system of complete irresponsibility<br />

by which all blame for individual thought and action is surrendered to exterior<br />

forces:<br />

“For Jews, the masculine and feminine archetypes in the collective unconscious<br />

have been reversed by the anti-Semitism of the dominant,<br />

white, male Christian culture. Jewish men may well experience themselves,<br />

and be experienced by Jewish women as somehow less masculine<br />

than men of the dominant culture; Jewish women may well experience<br />

themselves and be experienced by Jewish men as somehow less feminine<br />

than women of the dominant culture. Although Jewish men and women<br />

may blame each other for this phenomenon, the insidious process has<br />

its roots in anti-Semitism.” [BREITMAN, B., 1988, p. 112-113]<br />

Breitman even blames non-Jewish culture for “interfer[ing] in relationships<br />

between Jewish fathers and sons, preventing a critically important identification<br />

between the generations of men.” [BREITMAN, B., 1988, p. 104]<br />

In this kind of “everything’s your fault/we don’t control our own private<br />

lives” context, Norman Cantor can thereby excuse Jews en masse and blame<br />

Muslim mind control (while slurring Islamic society) for Jewish immorality in<br />

southwestern Europe in medieval times:<br />

“Rabbinical court records of the fourteenth century show a Jewish<br />

propensity to adapt to the lifestyle of Muslim society. Among the<br />

Sephardim [Jews of Spain and Portugal], polygamy, concubinage, adultery,<br />

and wife-beating were common.” [CANTOR, p. 186]<br />

Sander Gilman never admits the obvious, that an important reason for<br />

Jewish apostasy and disenchantment (“self-hatred”) over history has been the<br />

inevitable rejection by some Jews of the elitist and seclusionist tenets of the<br />

“Chosen People” mythos, or even to escape Jewish self-hate itself as an indigenously<br />

oppressive outcrop of traditional Jewish religious belief. It is irrefutable<br />

that some people just don’t like where they came from, whether it’s Judaism or<br />

Christianity, Kansas or New York. Centuries ago Christianity and its idealized<br />

teachings of Christ offered (however unfulfilled) anyone a step closer to the<br />

dream of human universalism, a concept intrinsically foreign to seminal Jewish<br />

beliefs. The people who led this movement were also Jewish, and, hence, to<br />

687

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!