Project Proposal (PDF) - Oxford Brookes University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

FP7-ICT-2011-9 STREP proposal 18/01/12 v1 [Dynact] Summary of effort A summary of the effort is useful for the evaluators. Please indicate in the table number of person months over the whole duration of the planned work, for each work package by each participant. Identify the workpackage leader for each WP by showing the relevant person-month figure in bold. Partic. Partic. short WP1 WP2 WP3 WP4 WP5 WP6 Total person no. name months 1 OBU 24+2 36+3 18 30 9+4 126 2 IDSIA 36 36 72 3 SYSTeMS 44 10 54 4 SUPÉLEC 18 6 24 5 DYN 6 30 36 Total 80 72 39 42 66 13 312 <strong>Proposal</strong> Part B: page [34] of [67]
FP7-ICT-2011-9 STREP proposal 18/01/12 v1 [Dynact] iv) PERT diagram of the interdependencies between individual work packages Figure 11. PERT diagram of the project. The causal dependencies (black arrows) between the five research work packages, broken down into their component tasks, are shown. The feedback links from the validations tasks T5.2-6 of WP5 and the methodological work packages WP1,2,3 are shown as red arrows. Milestones M1-M10 are denoted by circles: their location within the lifespan of the project is indicated in months. The above PERT diagram illustrated the overall structure of the project in terms of causual dependencies between workpackages and their individual tasks, milestones, and temporal evolution. As we said the project is subdivided into four "pipelines": dynamic (classical and imprecise) generative modeling (WP1), generative model classification (WP2), dynamic discriminative modeling and classification (WP3) and feature extraction/selection (WP4), which reflect the main methodological contributions of the project. These four pipelines feed into the integration workpackage WP5 in which the developed techniques are tested in the different scenarios. A number of points should be highlighted: 1. the individual work packages are subdivided into a number of very specific, detailed tasks; 2. each work package contains two milestones, roughly aligned with month 18 and month 36 (end of the project); 3. the project is highly parallelised, though dependencies exist between tasks in different work packages; 4. feedback links (represented by red arrows) are foreseen between the integration/testing stage of the project (in the different scenarios, T5.2-6) and the theoretical work packages WP1-3: as algorithms are assembled and tested, strategies and approach will likely have to undergo one or more cycles of revision. <strong>Proposal</strong> Part B: page [35] of [67]
Page 1 and 2: FP7-ICT-2011-9 STREP proposal 18/01
Page 33: FP7-ICT-2011-9 STREP proposal 18/01
Page 67: FP7-ICT-2011-9 STREP proposal 18/01

Project Proposal (PDF) - Oxford Brookes University

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?