etadd_47(3) - Division on Autism and Developmental Disabilities

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ued for a minimum of five weeks and until all student data showed a change in level and trend. Maintenance probes (units 1–3) of previous units were conducted every two to three weeks after intervention throughout the duration of the study. No maintenance of Unit 4 was taken due to the ending of the school year. Only independent correct student responses were graphed and used for visual analysis of the data. Figure 2. Sample Student Assessment in Geometry. Procedure Baseline and Ongoing Probes. During baseline, the graduate research assistant served as the primary data collector. Inter-observer agreement was taken on one of the three baseline sessions by a second member of the research team. Students were individually assessed for each of the four units of instruction during each baseline probe. All baseline probes 378 / Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities-September 2012
TABLE 2 Content Standards, Alternate Achievement, and Task Analyses Used in Math National Standard (NCTM) based on 6-8 th grade bands Algebra: Represent and analyze mathematical situations and structures using algebraic symbols. Geometry: Specify locations and describe spatial relationships using coordinate geometry and other representational systems. Use visualization, spatial reasoning, and geometric modeling to solve problems. Measurement: Apply appropriate techniques, tools, and formulas to determine measurements. Data Analysis and Probability: Formulate questions that can be addressed with data and collect, organize, and display relevant data to answer them. Competency Goal(s) from state standard course of study standards Use and evaluate algebraic expressions. Solve simple (one- and two-step) equations or inequalities. Represent problem situations with geometric models. Identify, predict, and describe dilations in the coordinate plane. Develop flexibility in solving problems by selecting strategies and using mental computation, estimation, calculators or computers, and paper and pencil. Collect, organize, analyze, and display data (including box plots and histograms) to solve problems. followed the same guidelines described under the description of the dependent variable. No feedback was given to students during baseline probes. Data was graphed and visually inspected after each session. After baseline, the same procedures were followed to continue to probe whatever unit was receiving instruction. That is, one or two times a week prior to the lesson, the graduate student con- Alternate Achievement standards addressed in this study Task Analysis Solve simple one-step equations that relate to stories about daily events. Identify and describe the intersection of figures in a plane. Draw line segments and a coordinate plane to demonstrate spatial sense for familiar contexts like grocery store. Develop numbers sense for real numbers. Develop flexibility in solving mathematical problems by selecting strategies and using appropriate technology. Use next dollar strategy to solve problems related to everyday transactions. Collect, organize and display data to solve problems from familiar events. ducted the task analytic assessment for that unit. At the end of a unit, all units were reprobed before the next was introduced. Intervention Identify problem statement. Identify first, second, and last fact in story. Name unknown quantity “x”. Place facts in correct sequence on Equation Prompt. Identify operation needed to solve problem. State solution to problem. State solution in story context. Identify problem statement. Identify points on map using facts from story. Draw line segments formed from identified points. Identify plane formed from line segments. State solution to problem. State solution in story context. Identify problem statement. Identify dollar amount from fact in story. Count number of one dollar bills equal to given dollar amount. Count out one more dollar, (if verbal, may say “and one more” while counting one more). State solution to problem. State solution in story context. Identify problem statement. Record data from story on graph. Identify choice with “more”. State solution to problem. State solution in story context. The mathematics intervention included (a) mathematics word problem stories based on familiar activities, (b) a graphic organizer and Grade-Aligned Secondary Math / 379
Page 1 and 2:
Education and Training in Autism an
Page 3 and 4:
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
ities. Scholars have argued that do
Page 9 and 10:
discussions were held with 12 addit
Page 11 and 12:
TABLE 1 A Sample of Community Funds
Page 13 and 14:
et al., 2007). At the school, stude
Page 15 and 16:
students opportunities to work and
Page 17 and 18:
Browder, D. M., & Cooper-Duffy, K.
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
of words, and in the short term wer
Page 23 and 24:
TABLE 3 Word Lists List No. Trainin
Page 25 and 26:
TABLE 6 Pairwise Comparisons on Pos
Page 27 and 28:
Word Identification or Word Attack
Page 29 and 30:
erate to severe disabilities. Excep
Page 31 and 32:
ess in a variety of subjects includ
Page 33 and 34:
TABLE 1 Target Vocabulary Words by
Page 35 and 36:
Figure 1. Example of PowerPoint Sli
Page 37 and 38:
TABLE 3 Mean Percentage of Correct
Page 39 and 40:
Figure 4. Jake’s percentages corr
Page 41 and 42:
man-Martin et al. (2005) by demonst
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
used in the study that did not foll
Page 47 and 48:
lected. Stories were read in a quie
Page 49 and 50:
y determining the number of interva
Page 51 and 52:
with the removal of the interventio
Page 53 and 54:
Accordingly, recent research has in
Page 55 and 56:
Method Participants Four male child
Page 57 and 58:
TABLE 2 Play Scale - Developmental
Page 59 and 60:
elated utterances, which were used
Page 61 and 62:
Figure 1. Ian’s Progress in Play
Page 63 and 64:
Figure 3. Ryan’s Progress in Play
Page 65 and 66:
Figure 5. Social Validity: Average
Page 67 and 68:
(2000). A comparison of video model
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Method Participants Four high schoo
Page 73 and 74:
TABLE 1 Task Analyses for all Tasks
Page 75 and 76:
Figure 1. Holly multiple baseline g
Page 77 and 78: Figure 3. Norman multiple baseline
Page 79 and 80: ing at photographs. Jake only requi
Page 81 and 82: tion, some aspects of the target be
Page 83 and 84: table video aids may lead to greate
Page 85 and 86: TABLE 2 Task Analyses Including Vid
Page 87 and 88: table.” During the session, the t
Page 89 and 90: Figure 2. Percent of steps with err
Page 91 and 92: ter the 15 th session. With table w
Page 93 and 94: our students, it may have been diff
Page 95 and 96: Education and Training in Autism an
Page 97 and 98: TABLE 2 Participants Demographic Da
Page 99 and 100: opening of the lesson, the teacher
Page 101 and 102: TABLE 4 Total Number of Items Answe
Page 103 and 104: Figure 2. Total number of procedura
Page 105 and 106: serve both cognitive (e.g., self in
Page 107 and 108: and quasi-experimental designs for
Page 111 and 112: & Cobb, 2002). Generalization, the
Page 113 and 114: academic activities in the classroo
Page 115 and 116: Procedure Baseline. In this multipl
Page 117 and 118: condition for each student. With th
Page 119 and 120: was repeated across all participant
Page 121 and 122: Boning, R. A. (1997). SRA Specific
Page 125 and 126: TABLE 1 Student demographic informa
Page 127: ping, dining out, voting) and diffe
Page 131 and 132: Student Achievement Figures 3-6 pro
Page 133 and 134: Figure 4. Student data across math
Page 135 and 136: Figure 6. Student data across math
Page 137 and 138: A second limitation of the current
Page 141 and 142: y students with intellectual disabi
Page 143 and 144: TABLE 1 Studies of Mathematics Inte
Page 145 and 146: subject design to provide an interv
Page 147 and 148: Neef and colleagues (2003) demonstr
Page 149 and 150: abilities. Education and Training i
show all

etadd_47(3) - Division on Autism and Developmental Disabilities

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?