- Page 1 and 2:
Education and Training in Autism an
- Page 3 and 4:
Education and Training in Autism an
- Page 5 and 6:
Education and Training in Autism an
- Page 7 and 8:
ities. Scholars have argued that do
- Page 9 and 10:
discussions were held with 12 addit
- Page 11 and 12:
TABLE 1 A Sample of Community Funds
- Page 13 and 14:
et al., 2007). At the school, stude
- Page 15 and 16:
students opportunities to work and
- Page 17 and 18:
Browder, D. M., & Cooper-Duffy, K.
- Page 19 and 20:
Education and Training in Autism an
- Page 21 and 22:
of words, and in the short term wer
- Page 23 and 24:
TABLE 3 Word Lists List No. Trainin
- Page 25 and 26:
TABLE 6 Pairwise Comparisons on Pos
- Page 27 and 28:
Word Identification or Word Attack
- Page 29 and 30:
erate to severe disabilities. Excep
- Page 31 and 32:
ess in a variety of subjects includ
- Page 33 and 34:
TABLE 1 Target Vocabulary Words by
- Page 35 and 36:
Figure 1. Example of PowerPoint Sli
- Page 37 and 38:
TABLE 3 Mean Percentage of Correct
- Page 39 and 40:
Figure 4. Jake’s percentages corr
- Page 41 and 42:
man-Martin et al. (2005) by demonst
- Page 43 and 44:
Education and Training in Autism an
- Page 45 and 46:
used in the study that did not foll
- Page 47 and 48:
lected. Stories were read in a quie
- Page 49 and 50:
y determining the number of interva
- Page 51 and 52:
with the removal of the interventio
- Page 53 and 54:
Accordingly, recent research has in
- Page 55 and 56:
Method Participants Four male child
- Page 57 and 58:
TABLE 2 Play Scale - Developmental
- Page 59 and 60:
elated utterances, which were used
- Page 61 and 62:
Figure 1. Ian’s Progress in Play
- Page 63 and 64:
Figure 3. Ryan’s Progress in Play
- Page 65 and 66:
Figure 5. Social Validity: Average
- Page 67 and 68:
(2000). A comparison of video model
- Page 69 and 70:
Education and Training in Autism an
- Page 71 and 72:
Method Participants Four high schoo
- Page 73 and 74:
TABLE 1 Task Analyses for all Tasks
- Page 75 and 76:
Figure 1. Holly multiple baseline g
- Page 77 and 78:
Figure 3. Norman multiple baseline
- Page 79 and 80:
ing at photographs. Jake only requi
- Page 81 and 82:
tion, some aspects of the target be
- Page 83 and 84: table video aids may lead to greate
- Page 85 and 86: TABLE 2 Task Analyses Including Vid
- Page 87 and 88: table.” During the session, the t
- Page 89 and 90: Figure 2. Percent of steps with err
- Page 91 and 92: ter the 15 th session. With table w
- Page 93 and 94: our students, it may have been diff
- Page 95 and 96: Education and Training in Autism an
- Page 97 and 98: TABLE 2 Participants Demographic Da
- Page 99 and 100: opening of the lesson, the teacher
- Page 101 and 102: TABLE 4 Total Number of Items Answe
- Page 103 and 104: Figure 2. Total number of procedura
- Page 105 and 106: serve both cognitive (e.g., self in
- Page 107 and 108: and quasi-experimental designs for
- Page 109 and 110: Education and Training in Autism an
- Page 111 and 112: & Cobb, 2002). Generalization, the
- Page 113 and 114: academic activities in the classroo
- Page 115 and 116: Procedure Baseline. In this multipl
- Page 117 and 118: condition for each student. With th
- Page 119 and 120: was repeated across all participant
- Page 121 and 122: Boning, R. A. (1997). SRA Specific
- Page 123 and 124: Education and Training in Autism an
- Page 125 and 126: TABLE 1 Student demographic informa
- Page 127 and 128: ping, dining out, voting) and diffe
- Page 129 and 130: TABLE 2 Content Standards, Alternat
- Page 131 and 132: Student Achievement Figures 3-6 pro
- Page 133: Figure 4. Student data across math
- Page 137 and 138: A second limitation of the current
- Page 139 and 140: Education and Training in Autism an
- Page 141 and 142: y students with intellectual disabi
- Page 143 and 144: TABLE 1 Studies of Mathematics Inte
- Page 145 and 146: subject design to provide an interv
- Page 147 and 148: Neef and colleagues (2003) demonstr
- Page 149 and 150: abilities. Education and Training i
- Page 151 and 152: Education and Training in Autism an