03.08.2013 Views

The Nation's Responses To Flood Disasters: A Historical Account

The Nation's Responses To Flood Disasters: A Historical Account

The Nation's Responses To Flood Disasters: A Historical Account

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> Early 20th Century: A Growing Federal Interest 9<br />

<strong>The</strong> Great <strong>Flood</strong> of 1927. <strong>The</strong> great flood of 1927 tested the “levees only” policy and<br />

demonstrated the major problems associated with a one-sided approach to flood control.<br />

Much of the levee system along the lower Mississippi was breached or overtopped, and<br />

the flood torrent fanned out over the flat delta. At the flood’s highest point, the river<br />

spread 50 to 100 miles wide in a “chocolate sea” stretching 1,000 miles from Cairo,<br />

Illinois, at the mouth of the Ohio River, to the Gulf of Mexico. <strong>The</strong> official death toll<br />

was 246 but may have reached 500. More than 700,000 people were homeless. Over 150<br />

Red Cross camps cared for in excess of 325,000 refugees for several months after the<br />

flood. Some 137,000 buildings and homes were damaged or destroyed. Property damage<br />

topped $236 million, an enormous figure even in those pre-Depression years. Nearly 13<br />

million acres of land (about 20,000 square miles) were flooded. 18 In the book Rising<br />

Tide, 19 John Barry provides a compelling account of the events leading up to the 1927<br />

Mississippi River flood and how the calamity changed America. <strong>The</strong> 1927 flood event<br />

was arguably the greatest natural disaster to befall this nation in terms of total human<br />

misery and suffering.<br />

<strong>The</strong> flood of 1927 united the nation with respect to flood control, at least insofar<br />

as the Mississippi River was concerned. Doubts still lingered about a nationwide flood<br />

control policy. Public opinion favored a program in which the federal government paid<br />

for flood control in the Mississippi Valley. Adopting this position meant reversing the<br />

current federal policy, which was based on the reasoning that even though the protective<br />

levees benefited the whole nation, local interests benefited the most and should share in<br />

the protection costs. <strong>To</strong> President Coolidge, federal funding meant federal control and<br />

abdication of local responsibility. When congressional plans emerged without any local<br />

cost contribution, the President threatened a veto. 20<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Flood</strong> Control Act of 1928. A series of political compromises ensued, leading to the<br />

<strong>Flood</strong> Control Act of 1928. In passing the act, Congress adopted a flood control plan that<br />

abandoned the levees only approach. <strong>The</strong> government recognized that major floods, such<br />

as happened in 1927, involved drainage from far outside the lower Mississippi valley,<br />

that locals were unable to finance effective flood control measures, and that local<br />

governments were already making enormous contributions to flood control. <strong>The</strong> act<br />

provided that the federal government would pay for building expanded protective<br />

measures. <strong>The</strong> non-federal contribution would consist of providing rights of way (for the<br />

levees along the main stem; the federal government ended up paying for flowage rights of<br />

way) and having levee districts and state governments maintain the levees.<br />

18 Moore and Moore, p. 6.<br />

19 Barry, John M., Rising Tide: <strong>The</strong> Great Mississippi <strong>Flood</strong> of 1927 and How It Changed America, (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1997).<br />

20 Moore and Moore, p. 6.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!