The Nation's Responses To Flood Disasters: A Historical Account
The Nation's Responses To Flood Disasters: A Historical Account
The Nation's Responses To Flood Disasters: A Historical Account
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3<br />
THE 1930S TO THE 1960S:<br />
BROADENING SOLUTIONS TO THE<br />
NATION’S FLOOD PROBLEMS<br />
<strong>The</strong> nation now moved closer to a balanced<br />
approach to flood hazards.<br />
CALLS FOR A BROADER APPROACH<br />
Even as federal involvement in controlling floods through structural works<br />
increased, calls came for a more comprehensive approach to the nation’s flood problems<br />
due to some disturbing trends that had developed by the mid-1950s. Both the potential<br />
nationwide damage from flooding and the cost of protection were rising. America’s<br />
rapidly increasing urban population lay at the heart of the problem. <strong>The</strong> national flood<br />
damage potential was increasing faster than it could be controlled under existing flood<br />
protection construction programs. With this in mind, many pointed out the fallacy of<br />
relying entirely on measures to redirect the paths of flood waters, citing lessons learned<br />
from the “levees only” policy adopted some 75 years earlier for the lower Mississippi<br />
River Valley. Others saw wise land use management practices within floodprone areas as<br />
a neglected alternative to construction programs.<br />
EVOLVING VIEWS ON HUMAN ADJUSTMENT TO FLOODS: HARLAN<br />
H. BARROWS AND GILBERT F. WHITE<br />
<strong>The</strong>se cries of concern as to how we, as a nation, use our floodplains, did not<br />
originate in the 20th century. A report issued in the early 1850s, at the direction of the<br />
Congress, insisted the flood problem in the Mississippi River delta was growing because<br />
more cultivation was taking place in the floodplain. 30 W J McGee, in his 1891 article<br />
30 Ellet, 1853.