The Nation's Responses To Flood Disasters: A Historical Account
The Nation's Responses To Flood Disasters: A Historical Account
The Nation's Responses To Flood Disasters: A Historical Account
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
38<br />
<strong>The</strong> Nation’s <strong>Responses</strong> to <strong>Flood</strong> <strong>Disasters</strong>: A <strong>Historical</strong> <strong>Account</strong><br />
reorganization was April 1, 1979. At that time, the NFIP transferred from HUD, where it<br />
had been since 1968, to the new FEMA.<br />
President Carter’s 1978 Water Policy Initiatives included funding of the NFIP<br />
Section 1362 program that spent $35 million in over 100 communities to purchase more<br />
than 1,000 repetitively damaged properties. Before being superceded by buyout<br />
programs after the 1993 Midwest flood, the Section 1362 program provided valuable<br />
experience in applying this mitigation approach.<br />
State and local assistance<br />
State floodplain management capability to assist communities to interpret and<br />
utilize flood insurance study data and to enact and enforce required floodplain<br />
management measures did not exist in most states. Funding, first provided in 1979 under<br />
FEMA’s State Assistance Program, aided in developing this capability. Later, in the<br />
1980s, this program transitioned into a Community Assistance Program to focus state<br />
floodplain technical assistance and encourage local program development and<br />
enforcement of NFIP requirements. <strong>The</strong> assistance program worked, and by the early<br />
1980s, community participation exceeded 16,500.<br />
From around 3,000 communities in 1980 to around 8,000 communities in 1984 95<br />
had received flood insurance studies from the FIA and had entered the flood insurance<br />
program’s Regular Program phase, with development regulations in identified floodhazard<br />
areas that at least met the minimum floodplain management requirements set forth<br />
by FIA. More than 8,000 communities still participated in the Emergency Program,<br />
employing a minimal form of land use regulation based on best available data until more<br />
studies could be completed.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Coastal Barrier Resources Act and continued deregulation<br />
<strong>The</strong> Coastal Barrier Resources Act (CBRA), 96 adopted in 1982, prohibited new<br />
federal expenditures (including the issuance of federal flood insurance and the provision<br />
of most disaster assistance) in designated units of undeveloped coastal barrier islands off<br />
the Atlantic and Gulf coasts on and after October 1, 1983. Congress added more land<br />
units to the system in 1990.<br />
According to FEMA official Michael F. Robinson, CBRA reflected the politics<br />
of the time. Much of the environmental community believed that flood insurance and<br />
other federal programs encouraged development of barrier islands and other sensitive<br />
areas. <strong>The</strong>y also realized that further federal involvement in regulation was not likely to<br />
happen under the Reagan administration. If anything, regulatory programs at that time<br />
were in jeopardy. CBRA became an attempt to marry environmental protection and<br />
95 Ibid.<br />
96 P. L. 97-348.