The Nation's Responses To Flood Disasters: A Historical Account
The Nation's Responses To Flood Disasters: A Historical Account
The Nation's Responses To Flood Disasters: A Historical Account
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>The</strong> 1970s and 1980s: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Flood</strong> Insurance Era 53<br />
THE ASSOCIATION OF STATE FLOODPLAIN MANAGERS<br />
In the late 1950s, water resources officials from some dozen Midwest states<br />
(Ohio to the Dakotas) started meeting annually to discuss common concerns with<br />
flooding, including flood control, hydrology, mapping, and other water resource issues.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se conferences opened channels of communication among the states for airing<br />
interstate issues. Working together over a period that spanned several decades, the<br />
officials developed an understanding and respect of each other's positions on how to<br />
address flood problems, problems that often extended beyond state boundaries and<br />
among numerous federal agencies. This experience set the table for the subsequent<br />
formation of a national association, and annual conferences, of state floodplain managers<br />
that ultimately replaced the annual Midwestern States Water Resources and <strong>Flood</strong><br />
Control Conferences. A number of these officials played lead roles in creating the<br />
ASFPM.<br />
<strong>The</strong> ASFPM evolved from a number of issues related to the NFIP. <strong>The</strong> principal<br />
issues consisted of identifying flood-hazard areas and adopting local floodplain<br />
regulation. Of the federal Region V states—Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota,<br />
Ohio, and Wisconsin—five had statutory authority that affected the preparation of flood<br />
insurance studies. Several had active floodplain management programs that pre-dated the<br />
NFIP.<br />
By the mid-1970s, the states had trouble fulfilling the needs of the accelerated<br />
flood insurance study program because they could not complete their study reviews in a<br />
timely manner. FIA officials held a meeting with the Region V states in Chicago in<br />
November 1976 to discuss coordination problems and other NFIP issues. At this<br />
meeting, the states decided to meet the following year during the regional FIA meeting.<br />
Concerned with delays in issuing flood insurance study reports, the FIA, in<br />
August 1977, decided to circumvent the state review and approval process that occurred<br />
prior to sending the studies to local governments for use in local floodplain management<br />
programs. <strong>The</strong> states in Region V objected to this unilateral policy and indicated that<br />
studies without state approval would not be used for regulation in the state. In October<br />
1977, the FIA met with the Region V state coordinators in Chicago. 135 As a result of this<br />
meeting, the FIA revised the study policy and addressed other issues. <strong>The</strong> states’ success<br />
in reversing this policy change solidified their cause and pushed them to form an<br />
association that eventually evolved into the ASFPM, an organization that acts on their<br />
collective behalf.<br />
135 Attendees at the 1977 meeting between the FIA and the Region V state coordinators included French Wetmore, Brent McMahon, Larry Sanders, Chuck<br />
Morris and Frank Rupp from Illinois; Gordon Lance and Bill Trakimas from Indiana; Jim Boulton and Dan Morgan from Michigan; Pat Bloomgren and Jim<br />
Wright from Minnesota; Peter Finke from Ohio; and Larry Larson, Terry Hampton, and <strong>To</strong>m Muellner from Wisconsin.