The Nation's Responses To Flood Disasters: A Historical Account
The Nation's Responses To Flood Disasters: A Historical Account
The Nation's Responses To Flood Disasters: A Historical Account
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>The</strong> 1930s to the 1960s: Broadening Solutions to the Nation’s <strong>Flood</strong> Problems 27<br />
THE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE PREPARES LOCAL FLOOD<br />
STUDIES<br />
Section 6 of the Watershed Protection and <strong>Flood</strong> Prevention Act of 1954<br />
provided the legislative authority for the SCS to prepare local flood hazard studies.<br />
However, the agency only began preparing the studies after a Bureau of the Budget Task<br />
Force on Federal <strong>Flood</strong> Control Policy (see below, “Bureau of the Budget Task Force”)<br />
recommended it in 1966. By the end of the decade, the SCS had resources to prepare<br />
flood hazard information studies and had technical assistance to offer local officials. 71<br />
Thus, the SCS joined the TVA, the Corps, and the USGS in these efforts to<br />
define flood dangers. In addition, the National Weather Service and the Delaware and<br />
Susquehanna River Basin Commissions prepared a small number of studies in the 1960s<br />
and 1970s. <strong>Flood</strong>plain management measures could now be put into practice.<br />
Engineering techniques were available to produce maps showing areas inundated by<br />
floods of various magnitudes and to define a floodway, along with the provision of other<br />
needed flood data.<br />
SEVERAL STATES LEAD THE WAY IN FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT<br />
Murphy reported in 1958 that only seven states (Connecticut, Indiana, Iowa,<br />
Massachusetts, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Washington) had enacted and were<br />
enforcing state floodplain management regulations, principally for narrow channel<br />
encroachment areas. Six of these programs were adopted in response to catastrophic<br />
floods. Based on his evaluation of the regulations, he concluded “that they are not in<br />
major conflict with existing developments nor unduly restrictive to new developments.” 72<br />
However, by the late 1960s, a number of states had statutes regulating broader<br />
flood hazard areas: 73<br />
• A 1962 Washington state statute provided that the state establish flood control zones<br />
when data were available for that purpose. Any activity to construct, reconstruct, or<br />
modify any structure or works affecting flood waters within any established zone<br />
required a state permit.<br />
• A 1965 California state code encouraged “local levels of government to plan land use<br />
regulations to accomplish floodplain management and to provide state assistance and<br />
guidance as appropriate.” 74<br />
71 Buie, Eugene C., A History of Water Resource Activities of the United States Department of Agriculture, (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil<br />
Conservation Service, 1979).<br />
72 Murphy, p. 16.<br />
73 Regulation of <strong>Flood</strong> Hazard Areas <strong>To</strong> Reduce <strong>Flood</strong> Losses, (U.S. Water Resources Council, vol. 1, Parts I-IV, 1971), pp. 60, 127-175.<br />
74 Ibid., p. 171.