03.08.2013 Views

The Nation's Responses To Flood Disasters: A Historical Account

The Nation's Responses To Flood Disasters: A Historical Account

The Nation's Responses To Flood Disasters: A Historical Account

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

74<br />

<strong>The</strong> Nation’s <strong>Responses</strong> to <strong>Flood</strong> <strong>Disasters</strong>: A <strong>Historical</strong> <strong>Account</strong><br />

By the end of 1995, most of the agency representatives on the task force had<br />

retired from federal service, including Frank Thomas who had provided sound leadership<br />

and direction. Thus, the task force lacked continuity and follow-up mechanisms for its<br />

recent work, including the recommendations from the 1994 report. In an effort to<br />

consider and implement the recommendations, FEMA convened a group of about 40<br />

nationally recognized experts at the ASFPM’s’ annual conference in Little Rock,<br />

Arkansas, in May 1997. FEMA prepared a report on the forum, 162 but no action has been<br />

taken on the 1994 recommendations. In addition to problems of continuity in leadership,<br />

the Unified National Program for <strong>Flood</strong>plain Management has traditionally suffered from<br />

lack of high-level attention from presidential administrations. No entity exists to act<br />

upon the report’s recommendations and those of the national assessment.<br />

THE GREAT FLOOD OF 1993<br />

<strong>The</strong> 1993 flood in the upper Mississippi and lower Missouri River basins from<br />

mid-June through early August provided sobering evidence that the nation had yet to<br />

reach an accommodation between Nature’s periodic need to occupy her floodplains and<br />

their present human occupancy and use. <strong>The</strong> flood reached record levels at many<br />

locations within these basins. Various sources attempted to assign recurrence intervals<br />

(e.g., a “500-year” flood) to the flood, but they were subject to considerable error because<br />

of the complex and widespread nature of this event, the short historic data record upon<br />

which to base an analysis, changing observation methods, and the difficulty of assigning<br />

flow rates and elevations to past historic events. Although labeled by various media as<br />

the “flood of the century,” the 1927 flood on the lower Mississippi (see Chapter 2, “A<br />

Period of <strong>Flood</strong>s and Acts”), was the greatest flood disaster in our nation’s history in<br />

terms of overall human suffering and misery. A comprehensive evaluation of the 1993<br />

flood is contained in a book published in 1996. 163 Table 1 compares the two floods.<br />

No source prepared a final account of the costs/losses from the flood. In remarks<br />

delivered several years after the flood, Gerry Galloway stated “the flood is over. No one<br />

now cares.” 164<br />

162 Report on the Forum on the Unified National Program for <strong>Flood</strong>plain Management Goals, (Federal Interagency <strong>Flood</strong>plain Management Task Force, 1997).<br />

163 Changnon, Stanley A., ed., <strong>The</strong> Great <strong>Flood</strong> of 1993: Causes, Impacts and <strong>Responses</strong>, (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1996).<br />

164 Galloway, Gerald E., National <strong>Flood</strong> Policy, Progress Since the 1993 <strong>Flood</strong>s, (paper delivered at the Association of State <strong>Flood</strong>plain Managers Annual<br />

Conference, San Diego, CA, 1996).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!