New Approaches to in silico Design of Epitope-Based Vaccines
New Approaches to in silico Design of Epitope-Based Vaccines
New Approaches to in silico Design of Epitope-Based Vaccines
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Table B.3: Regression performances <strong>of</strong> WD-RBF and WD kernel. The table lists the<br />
mean PCCs obta<strong>in</strong>ed by a two-times nested five-fold cross validation <strong>of</strong> a WD-RBF (blosum50) and<br />
a WD kernel on the IEDB h9 allele subsets. The best performance per allele is highlighted (bold).<br />
Allele WD-RBF WD<br />
HLA-A*01:01 0.706 0.705<br />
HLA-A*02:01 0.815 0.810<br />
HLA-A*02:02 0.770 0.765<br />
HLA-A*02:03 0.793 0.770<br />
HLA-A*02:06 0.770 0.753<br />
HLA-A*03:01 0.742 0.733<br />
HLA-A*11:01 0.802 0.793<br />
HLA-A*23:01 0.686 0.609<br />
HLA-A*24:02 0.620 0.617<br />
HLA-A*24:03 0.587 0.599<br />
HLA-A*26:01 0.578 0.561<br />
HLA-A*29:02 0.840 0.799<br />
HLA-A*30:01 0.672 0.668<br />
HLA-A*30:02 0.574 0.581<br />
HLA-A*31:01 0.757 0.753<br />
HLA-A*33:01 0.672 0.671<br />
HLA-A*68:01 0.739 0.736<br />
HLA-A*68:02 0.756 0.749<br />
HLA-A*69:01 0.533 0.518<br />
HLA-B*07:02 0.796 0.786<br />
HLA-B*08:01 0.533 0.512<br />
HLA-B*15:01 0.709 0.713<br />
HLA-B*18:01 0.761 0.752<br />
HLA-B*27:05 0.714 0.684<br />
HLA-B*35:01 0.668 0.658<br />
HLA-B*40:01 0.557 0.561<br />
HLA-B*40:02 0.748 0.734<br />
HLA-B*44:02 0.614 0.653<br />
HLA-B*44:03 0.792 0.799<br />
HLA-B*45:01 0.742 0.706<br />
HLA-B*51:01 0.708 0.725<br />
HLA-B*53:01 0.737 0.743<br />
HLA-B*54:01 0.744 0.727<br />
HLA-B*57:01 0.742 0.698<br />
HLA-B*58:01 0.742 0.709<br />
101