05.08.2013 Views

New Approaches to in silico Design of Epitope-Based Vaccines

New Approaches to in silico Design of Epitope-Based Vaccines

New Approaches to in silico Design of Epitope-Based Vaccines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

58 CHAPTER 5. EPITOPE SELECTION<br />

It might be desirable <strong>to</strong> obta<strong>in</strong> several optimal or nearly optimal epi<strong>to</strong>pe sets. As<br />

proposed <strong>in</strong> [106], suboptimal solutions can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed by add<strong>in</strong>g the constra<strong>in</strong>ts given <strong>in</strong><br />

(5.2), where Sj represents the optimal set <strong>of</strong> epi<strong>to</strong>pes found <strong>in</strong> iteration j and s represents<br />

the desired number <strong>of</strong> epi<strong>to</strong>pe sets.<br />

<br />

xu ≤ k − q for j = 1 . . . s − 1 (5.2)<br />

u∈Sj<br />

The ILP has <strong>to</strong> be solved iteratively s times. After each iteration, the ILP for the next<br />

iteration, j + 1, is created by add<strong>in</strong>g the correspond<strong>in</strong>g constra<strong>in</strong>t <strong>to</strong> the ILP <strong>of</strong> iteration j.<br />

Every result<strong>in</strong>g epi<strong>to</strong>pe set differs from all other solutions <strong>in</strong> at least q peptides, 1 ≤ q ≤ k.<br />

5.3.2 Non-L<strong>in</strong>ear Requirements<br />

In order <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>corporate a requirement <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> the ILP framework it must be formulated as<br />

a l<strong>in</strong>ear constra<strong>in</strong>t. There are, however, reasonable requirements for good vacc<strong>in</strong>es which<br />

are non-l<strong>in</strong>ear. Two examples <strong>of</strong> such requirements will be discussed below.<br />

Example 1: Population coverage. A major <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> vacc<strong>in</strong>e design is population<br />

coverage: For what fraction <strong>of</strong> a target population will the result<strong>in</strong>g EV be effective? In<br />

theory this corresponds <strong>to</strong> the probability <strong>of</strong> an <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>in</strong> the population carry<strong>in</strong>g at<br />

least one MHC allele covered by the epi<strong>to</strong>pes <strong>in</strong> the EV. Given a set <strong>of</strong> MHC alleles A as<br />

before and their distribution with<strong>in</strong> a population, the population coverage <strong>of</strong> a particular<br />

set <strong>of</strong> epi<strong>to</strong>pes can be computed. For this computation the polygeny <strong>of</strong> the MHC has<br />

<strong>to</strong> be taken <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> account. It is A = A1 ∪ . . . ∪ Am with Ai be<strong>in</strong>g the set <strong>of</strong> alleles at<br />

locus i. Let pℓ(a) be the probability <strong>of</strong> an allele a occurr<strong>in</strong>g at the correspond<strong>in</strong>g MHC<br />

locus. Then, disregard<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>kage disequilibrium, the probability <strong>of</strong> an <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>in</strong> the<br />

population carry<strong>in</strong>g an allele from the set Ai at locus i corresponds <strong>to</strong><br />

˜pℓ(Ai) = 1 − (1 − <br />

pℓ(a)) 2 . (5.3)<br />

Let ya be as described above. It follows that the probability <strong>of</strong> an <strong>in</strong>dividual carry<strong>in</strong>g at<br />

least one MHC allele covered by the epi<strong>to</strong>pes <strong>in</strong> E, and thus the population coverage <strong>of</strong> E<br />

given A, is<br />

m<br />

κ(E, A) = 1 − (1 − <br />

yapℓ(a)) 2 . (5.4)<br />

i=1<br />

Example 2: Average number <strong>of</strong> active epi<strong>to</strong>pes per <strong>in</strong>dividual. Population coverage<br />

<strong>of</strong> an epi<strong>to</strong>pe set states what fraction <strong>of</strong> a population carries an MHC allele associated<br />

with one <strong>of</strong> the epi<strong>to</strong>pes. It does not give any <strong>in</strong>formation on the number <strong>of</strong> active epi<strong>to</strong>pes<br />

per <strong>in</strong>dividual. The number <strong>of</strong> epi<strong>to</strong>pes with<strong>in</strong> a set which are active for a specific <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

depends on the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s MHC genotype. Given the haploidic probabilities <strong>of</strong> MHC<br />

alleles with<strong>in</strong> a population the probability <strong>of</strong> an MHC genotype can be calculated. Alleles<br />

not <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the set A are accounted for by add<strong>in</strong>g a representative allele x <strong>to</strong> each<br />

locus. The frequency <strong>of</strong> the representative at locus i results from pℓ(xi) = 1− <br />

a∈Ai pℓ(a).<br />

a∈Ai<br />

a∈Ai

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!