06.08.2013 Views

The Alaska Contractor - Summer 2008

The Alaska Contractor - Summer 2008

The Alaska Contractor - Summer 2008

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

misrepresentations on to the engineer.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Alaska</strong> Supreme Court affirmed.<br />

Although the contractor had relied<br />

on the Trust’s assurances and only<br />

passed them on to the engineer, the<br />

court found that the contractor was<br />

negligent because it had relied merely<br />

on the verbal telephone statements<br />

of the Trust’s administrator. Said the<br />

court, “one would expect a prudent<br />

employer to have written documentation<br />

concerning fixed matters already<br />

of importance dealing with insurance.”<br />

Further, the court thought that the<br />

contractor should have “taken affirmative<br />

action” to determine what was required<br />

to assure nonunion employees<br />

were covered by the union trust fund.<br />

Simply taking the Trust’s spoken word<br />

for it apparently was not enough. <strong>The</strong><br />

court allowed that the contractor’s<br />

position was “a sympathetic one,” but<br />

held that the contractor had a duty “to<br />

take affirmative action to determine<br />

the nature and extent of the healthcare<br />

coverage,” and had failed to meet<br />

that duty.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are several lessons to be<br />

drawn by this case.<br />

First, contractors should require that<br />

assurances about insurance coverage<br />

from union trust funds be in writing.<br />

Second, contractors should take at<br />

least some affirmative action in verifying<br />

the accuracy of what they are told<br />

by the trust funds.<br />

Third, trust fund trustees should<br />

understand that they and their employees<br />

are not necessarily immune<br />

from liability claims. ERISA preempts<br />

only those state laws that “relate to any<br />

employee benefit plan.” If a state law,<br />

meaning a statute or a judicially created<br />

claim, applies to everyone generally,<br />

such as the tort of negligent misrepresentation,<br />

it is not preempted by the<br />

federal statute. Trust funds can be held<br />

liable for their run-of-the-mill negligence<br />

in dealing with others. Trustees<br />

should assure that their administrators<br />

and employees understand that<br />

they are subject to the normal duties<br />

of reasonable care in conducting their<br />

routine business, which the court held<br />

was similar to that of an insurer.<br />

Robert J. (Bob) Dickson is a partner<br />

of the Anchorage law firm Atkinson,<br />

Conway and Gagnon Inc.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!