08.08.2013 Views

Exploration and Optimization of Tellurium‐Based Thermoelectrics

Exploration and Optimization of Tellurium‐Based Thermoelectrics

Exploration and Optimization of Tellurium‐Based Thermoelectrics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

factor <strong>of</strong> Bi is comparable to Tl so even with its inclusion, the suggested quantity <strong>of</strong> Sn in the crystal was<br />

unreasonable. Thus, mixing on the 4c (M(1)) site was comprised <strong>of</strong> Tl, Sn <strong>and</strong> Bi based on anisotropic<br />

displacement parameter values as well as previous data from Tl9BiTe6 [244] or Tl9.05Sn0.95Te6 [245] or<br />

Tl10‐xLaxTe6 [236] were treated whilst the M(2) site was left fully occupied with Tl. Refinements converged<br />

smoothly without showing any abnormalities. Due to the difficulty <strong>of</strong> differentiating Tl from Bi<br />

scattering, EDX data taken on the crystal allowed us to fix Bi as ⅓ <strong>of</strong> the 4c site. The formula<br />

Tl8.67Sn0.63Bi0.70Te6 was refined to Tl8.66Sn0.67Bi0.67Te6, which leaves the atomic sites within 5 % <strong>of</strong> the<br />

nominal composition.<br />

In order to monitor the unit cell parameters <strong>of</strong> a wider range <strong>of</strong> samples, Rietveld refinements<br />

were performed on the samples with nominal x = 0.60, y = 0.40; x = 0.50, y = 0.50; <strong>and</strong> x = 1.00, y = 0.33.<br />

Data were collected on the aforementioned INEL diffractometer for approximately 12 hours in each<br />

case; all powders showed no additional phases in the resulting diffractograms.<br />

Crystallographic details <strong>of</strong> the data collections are summarized in Table 12.1, the atomic positions,<br />

isotropic displacement parameters, <strong>and</strong> occupancies <strong>of</strong> Tl10‐x‐ySnxBiyTe6 in Table A.3, <strong>and</strong> the bond ranges<br />

in Table A.4.<br />

12.2.1.4. Electronic Structure Calculations<br />

Self‐consistent tight‐binding first principles LMTO calculations, as previously discussed were<br />

implemented here. Three different models were calculated in 4/ including the Sn‐Bi equivalent<br />

compound, Tl9Sn0.5Bi0.5Te6, the Sn‐heavy Tl8.5Sn1Bi0.5Te6 <strong>and</strong> the Bi‐rich Tl9Sn0.5Bi1Te6. All compounds are<br />

originally <strong>of</strong> space group 4/. The wavefunctions used in the calculations are as follows: for Tl 6s,<br />

6p, 6d <strong>and</strong> 5f; for Sn 5s, 5p, <strong>and</strong> 5d <strong>and</strong> 4f; for Bi 6s, 6p, 6d <strong>and</strong> 5f; <strong>and</strong> for Te 5s, 5p, <strong>and</strong> 5d <strong>and</strong> 4f. The<br />

eigenvalue problems were solved on the basis <strong>of</strong> 1728 evenly‐dispersed k points within the<br />

irreproducible wedge <strong>of</strong> the first Brillouin zone, respectively, selected with an improved tetrahedron<br />

method. [203]<br />

12.3. Results <strong>and</strong> Discussion<br />

12.3.1. Crystal Structure<br />

A crystal <strong>of</strong> nominal composition Tl8.67Sn0.63Bi0.70Te6 was selected for single crystal diffraction in<br />

order to determine the lattice parameters <strong>and</strong> verify the atomic site positions <strong>and</strong> occupancies. This<br />

crystal structure was refined to Tl8.66Sn0.67Bi0.67Te6 <strong>and</strong> is analogous to Figure 10.1, with equal parts<br />

130

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!