08.08.2013 Views

Exploration and Optimization of Tellurium‐Based Thermoelectrics

Exploration and Optimization of Tellurium‐Based Thermoelectrics

Exploration and Optimization of Tellurium‐Based Thermoelectrics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

eported that another ternary in this system, TlSbTe2, also undergoes a phase transition – albeit at low<br />

temperatures. [254] Several unsuccessful attempts involving high‐temperature XRD were also<br />

endeavoured to further pursue this issue, but due to sample oxidation <strong>and</strong> additional noise from the<br />

furnace, no reliable data could be produced. Quenching experiments in attempt to freeze the sample’s<br />

state above this temperature are currently underway to learn if there is an identifiable high‐<br />

temperature phase for the Sb compounds.<br />

13.3.3.3. Low‐Temperature Physical Properties <strong>of</strong> Tl9TtxSb1‐xTe6<br />

Due to the phase transition’s effect on the pellet quality <strong>and</strong> stability, samples were required to<br />

be reproduced <strong>and</strong> annealed up to 473 K instead. Unfortunately, this lowers the functional temperature<br />

for this material, therefore projecting that it may not be as useful as Tl9BiTe6 due to the temperature<br />

ranges; lower annealing temperature also drops the magnitude <strong>of</strong> σ. Take for example Tl9Sn0.5Sb0.5Te6<br />

which initially showed a value <strong>of</strong> 727 ‐1 cm ‐1 , dropping to 575 ‐1 cm ‐1 at room temperature. Likewise,<br />

measurements on Tl9SbTe6 initially showed 874 ‐1 cm ‐1 to 429 ‐1 cm ‐1 at room temperature –a loss <strong>of</strong><br />

50 %. The systems however, show a more realistic trend in this lower temperature range, as depicted in<br />

Figure 13.4. With both <strong>of</strong> the measured series, one observes the generic increase <strong>of</strong> S with increasing<br />

temperature as expected for this family <strong>of</strong> compounds. All samples now show an overall increase in S<br />

with decreasing x values, from 42 V∙K ‐1 at room temperature with Tl9Pb0.5Sb0.5Te6 to 86 V∙K ‐1 at room<br />

temperature with Tl9Sn0.1Sb0.9Te6. It can be seen in the image that both series fall between the Seebeck<br />

values <strong>of</strong> the respective ternaries. Though values can be slightly more erratic due to the low annealing<br />

temperatures, this case demonstrates the system’s ability to form the expected trend through<br />

modifications in x.<br />

Figure 13.4 Low‐temperature ZEM measurements for Tl 9Tt xSb 1‐xTe 6:<br />

Seebeck coefficient <strong>and</strong> electrical conductivity (left) <strong>and</strong> power factor (right)<br />

142

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!