10.08.2013 Views

LSC South East - lsc.gov.uk - Learning and Skills Council

LSC South East - lsc.gov.uk - Learning and Skills Council

LSC South East - lsc.gov.uk - Learning and Skills Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3. Estimate the overall participation rates for 2013/2015 for each district<br />

For modelling purposes, we presume that the school leaving age is raised to 17 in<br />

2013 <strong>and</strong> to 18 in 2015, in line with <strong>gov</strong>ernment proposals. We interpret<br />

‘compulsory schooling’ to mean a participation rate of 98% rather than 100%, on<br />

the grounds that even if compulsory, there will be a minority who will not participate.<br />

Evidence from DCFS (Statistical Release: Pupil Absence – Autumn 2008 Term<br />

Report (Provisional), 6 May 2008) suggests that 0.7% of pupils in the <strong>South</strong> <strong>East</strong><br />

may be regarded as persistent truants, this figure ranging from 0.4% in<br />

Buckinghamshire to 1.3% in <strong>South</strong>ampton. This figure applies across the<br />

secondary sector <strong>and</strong> it is therefore likely that the figure is higher towards the end of<br />

compulsory schooling. We therefore feel justified in assuming a figure of around<br />

2% once the age is raised to 17 <strong>and</strong> then 18.<br />

(We also report the outcome of assuming a 100% participation rate in all<br />

authorities as one alternative scenario, though we believe this is less realistic than<br />

our central projection.)<br />

Not all authorities will be at precisely 98% however, so we allow authorities to vary<br />

around this figure in 2013/2015. We calculate the future overall participation rates<br />

as follows. We have the 2006 participation rates for district <strong>and</strong> unitary authorities<br />

from steps 1 <strong>and</strong> 2. We then assume that participation rates grow in line with the<br />

patterns identified earlier for 1998-2005, with lower participation authorities (in<br />

2006) following a faster rate of growth. There is a convergence of participation<br />

rates from the bottom up. Hence we specify a narrowing of the range of<br />

participation rates over the period. For 2006 we have a mean participation rate of<br />

86% <strong>and</strong> a range of 35% points (between 65% <strong>and</strong> 100%). For 20013, we set the<br />

mean to 98% <strong>and</strong> the range to 17% points (half its value in 2006) for 16 year olds.<br />

In schematic form we have the following mapping of participation rates:<br />

2006<br />

100%<br />

86%<br />

65%<br />

100%<br />

98%<br />

2013<br />

83%<br />

The halving of the range is a matter of judgement, based on the observed<br />

diminution of the range between 1998 <strong>and</strong> 2005 <strong>and</strong> the need to be spread around<br />

a higher average of 98%. Again, this assumption can be adjusted within the<br />

spreadsheet to explore alternative scenarios.<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!