SUMO - Eltis

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Document information Title: <strong>SUMO</strong> – System for Evaluation of Mobility Projects Authors: Pernilla Hyllenius, Trivector Traffic/Christer Ljungberg, Trivector Traffic/ Lena Smidfelt Rosqvist, Trivector Traffic Contact persons: Krister Wall, SRA/ Camilla Åhman, SRA/Anna-Lena Söderlind, SRA Logotype and layout: Ny reklam, Jönköping Publication: 2004:98E ISSN: 1401-9612 E-mail: vagverket.butiken@vv.se The English translation was made possible through MOVE, an Intelligent Energy Europe project.
Swedish Road Administration (SRA) preface The transport of goods and people is a precondition if society, organisations and businesses are to work efficiently. At the same time, transports are responsible for a significant level of environmental impact and people are killed or seriously injured as a result of shortcomings in the road transport system. We must work systematically to minimise these negative effects if we are to achieve a long-term sustainable transport system. Various types of measures are needed that influence transports, travelling habits, and road user behaviour. Information and communication are often effective in achieving change. The aim of this report is to present a method for systematic planning, evaluation, and management of projects in this area. If evaluations are carried out in the same way it is easier to exchange experiences and compare similar projects. In the longer term this also offers opportunities to describe the correlation between communicative efforts and their impact on overall societal goals. Soft parameters such as information and communication efforts are rarely followed up in the field of traffic. This often leads to unrealistic goals concerning the effects of specific projects. Only rarely can one directly evaluate how the number of fatalities or serious injuries is reduced or how carbon dioxide emissions are changed as a result of targeted information efforts. Instead, subsidiary targets are needed that reflect the work carried out within the project and the ability of the target group to assimilate the information. It may not be possible to differentiate between effects resulting from the project and effects as a result of overall changes in society. By using experiences from other fields, such as behavioural science and pedagogy, there are considerable opportunities to describe the efficacy of information and communication. We hope that this report will have a widespread impact at the SRA, and among our customers and collaborative partners. We hope it will offer support to both individual projects and in efforts for sustainable travel and transport in general. Borlänge July 2004 Per Lindroth, SRA Head of Department Society & Traffic Division sumo – System for Evaluation of Mobility Projects 3
Page 1: PUBLICATION 2004:98E System for Eva
Page 6 and 7: 6 sumo - System for Evaluation of M
Page 8 and 9: 8 1. Introduction to SUMO SUMO stan
Page 10 and 11: 10 2. Why monitor and evaluate? “
Page 12 and 13: 12 3. What is SUMO? 3.1 EVALUATION
Page 14 and 15: 14 evaluations in various types of
Page 16 and 17: 16 PROJECT START Describe task and
Page 18 and 19: 18 PERSON-RELATED FACTORS (LEVEL P)
Page 20 and 21: 20 • mode of transport, such as c
Page 22 and 23: 22 5.3 DESCRIPTION OF MOBILITY SERV
Page 24 and 25: 24 LEVEL Useful achievements Awaren
Page 26 and 27: 26 There are many different types o
Page 28 and 29: 28 Examples of indicators and colle
Page 30 and 31: 30 G - Satisfaction with the offer
Page 32 and 33: 32 8. Evaluation is simple when the
Page 34 and 35: 34 9. List of concepts Offer Refers
Page 37 and 38: EXAMPLES OF SUMO APPLICATIONS EXAMP
Page 39 and 40: Background Services Option offered
Page 43 and 44: Backgroun Services LEVEL Y P A B C
Page 45 and 46: COMBINATION OF PHYSICAL MEASURES AN
Page 47 and 48: Activities Activities within the pr

SUMO - Eltis

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?