SUMO - Eltis

Background
Services
Option offered
Effects
SUMO analysis levels
LEVEL INDICATORS
Y
P
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
External factors
Person-related
factors
Useful
achievements
Awareness of
mobility service
Degree of use of
mobility service
Satisfaction with
the mobility service
Acceptance of the
offer
Experimental
individual
behaviour
Satisfaction with
the offer
Permanent
individual travel
behaviour
System impact
*) Can be identified using focus groups of drivers.
– Legislation, fines
– Urban or rural driving
– Deliveries with regular stops or long-distance driving
– Gender
– Age
– Number of meetings held with management
– Number of occasions aimed at increasing driver interest
in road safety aspects of their working environment
Hardly relevant to measure separately, go directly to next level.
– Number (percentage) of drivers that attended the course
– Number (percentage) of employees that think the course
was good
In this case, the analysis level does not contribute anything and
can be omitted.
Possible indicators:
– Number (percentage) of drivers that say they are
planning to follow a policy that includes seat belt use
– Number (percentage) of drivers that in a questionnaire say
they always use a seat belt
– Random checks to measure the actual level of seat belt use
– Measurements before and after the course.
In this case, the analysis level does not contribute anything and
can be omitted.
Possible indicators:
– Comments* on how the use of seat belts is working
– Number (percentage) of drivers that in a questionnaire say
they always use a seat belt
– Random checks to measure the actual level of seat belt use
Measurements are carried out 12 months after the course
National cause and effect relationships exist between seat belt
use and the outcome of accidents. It is hardly possible to
measure system effects at an individual company. At larger
companies it may be possible to use insurance statistics or other
accident and injury reports.
sumo – Appendix 41
2
EXAMPLE