14.08.2013 Views

European Court of Justice VAT cases 2006-3 - empcom.gov.in

European Court of Justice VAT cases 2006-3 - empcom.gov.in

European Court of Justice VAT cases 2006-3 - empcom.gov.in

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Case C-68/92<br />

17 November 1993<br />

Commission <strong>of</strong> the <strong>European</strong> Communities – French<br />

Republic<br />

1. By exclud<strong>in</strong>g, by means <strong>of</strong> an adm<strong>in</strong>istrative practice, from the<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> 'advertis<strong>in</strong>g service' with<strong>in</strong> the mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Article<br />

9(2)(e) <strong>of</strong> the Sixth Directive [...],<br />

a. the sale by an advertis<strong>in</strong>g agency to its customer <strong>of</strong> articles<br />

<strong>in</strong>tended to be handed out to consumers,<br />

b. services provided by an advertis<strong>in</strong>g agency <strong>in</strong> connection<br />

with various events such as recreational functions ..., and<br />

c. the production <strong>of</strong> advertis<strong>in</strong>g aids, even where all those<br />

activities either <strong>in</strong>volve convey<strong>in</strong>g an advertis<strong>in</strong>g message<br />

or are <strong>in</strong>extricably l<strong>in</strong>ked to the convey<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> such a message,<br />

the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the<br />

Sixth Directive;<br />

2. The French Republic is ordered to pay the costs.<br />

[1993] ECR I-5881<br />

Case C-69/92<br />

17 November 1993<br />

Commission <strong>of</strong> the <strong>European</strong> Communities – Grand<br />

Duchy <strong>of</strong> Luxembourg<br />

1. By exclud<strong>in</strong>g the sale <strong>of</strong> movable tangible property <strong>in</strong> the<br />

context <strong>of</strong> an advertis<strong>in</strong>g campaign and services provided <strong>in</strong><br />

connection with a variety <strong>of</strong> public-relations events, such as<br />

press conferences, sem<strong>in</strong>ars, cocktail parties and recreational<br />

functions, from the concept <strong>of</strong> 'advertis<strong>in</strong>g services' under<br />

Article 9(2)(e) <strong>of</strong> the Sixth Directive [...], even where those<br />

transactions either <strong>in</strong>volve convey<strong>in</strong>g an advertis<strong>in</strong>g message<br />

or are <strong>in</strong>extricably l<strong>in</strong>ked to the convey<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> such a message,<br />

the Grand Duchy <strong>of</strong> Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations<br />

under that Directive and under the EEC Treaty;<br />

2. The Grand Duchy <strong>of</strong> Luxembourg is ordered to pay the costs.<br />

[1993] ECR I-5907<br />

Case C-73/92<br />

17 November 1993<br />

Commission <strong>of</strong> the <strong>European</strong> Communities – K<strong>in</strong>gdom <strong>of</strong><br />

Spa<strong>in</strong><br />

1. By <strong>in</strong>stitut<strong>in</strong>g and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> force a system <strong>of</strong> <strong>VAT</strong> applicable<br />

to advertis<strong>in</strong>g services which excludes promotional<br />

activities from that concept, even where those activities <strong>in</strong>volve<br />

convey<strong>in</strong>g a message <strong>in</strong>tended to <strong>in</strong>form consumers <strong>of</strong><br />

the existence and qualities <strong>of</strong> the product or service that is the<br />

subject-matter <strong>of</strong> those activities, with a view to <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />

sales <strong>of</strong> that product or service, the K<strong>in</strong>gdom <strong>of</strong> Spa<strong>in</strong> has<br />

failed to fulfil its obligations under the Sixth Directive [...], <strong>in</strong><br />

particular Article 9(2)(e), and under the EEC Treaty;<br />

2. The K<strong>in</strong>gdom <strong>of</strong> Spa<strong>in</strong> is ordered to pay the costs.<br />

[1993] ECR I-5997<br />

Case C-234/91<br />

1 December 1993<br />

Commission <strong>of</strong> the <strong>European</strong> Communities – K<strong>in</strong>gdom <strong>of</strong><br />

Denmark<br />

1. By <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g by Law No. 840 <strong>of</strong> 18 December<br />

1987, as amended, the fiscal rules provid<strong>in</strong>g for the payment<br />

<strong>of</strong> a contribution to support the labour market, which is<br />

a levy <strong>of</strong> a fiscal nature generally charged on the same basis<br />

<strong>of</strong> assessment as <strong>VAT</strong>, but without comply<strong>in</strong>g with the Community<br />

rules apply<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>VAT</strong>, the K<strong>in</strong>gdom <strong>of</strong> Denmark has<br />

<strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>ged the provisions <strong>of</strong> Article 33 <strong>of</strong> the Sixth Directive<br />

[...], and has consequently failed to fulfil its obligations under<br />

the EEC Treaty, <strong>in</strong> particular Article 189 there<strong>of</strong>;<br />

2. Each <strong>of</strong> the parties are ordered to bear its own costs.<br />

[1993] ECR I-6273<br />

Case C-63/92<br />

15 December 1993<br />

Lubbock F<strong>in</strong>e and Company S Commissioners <strong>of</strong> Customs and<br />

Excise<br />

1. The term 'lett<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> immovable property' used <strong>in</strong> Article<br />

13(B)(b) <strong>of</strong> the Sixth Directive [...] to def<strong>in</strong>e an exempt transaction<br />

covers the case where a tenant surrenders his lease<br />

Judgments <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Justice</strong> – 10<br />

© <strong>2006</strong> IBFD<br />

and returns the immovable property to his immediate landlord.<br />

2. Article 13(B)(b) <strong>of</strong> Directive 77/388, which allows Member<br />

States to apply further exclusion to the scope <strong>of</strong> the exemption<br />

for the lett<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> immovable property, does not authorize<br />

them to tax the consideration paid by one party to the other<br />

<strong>in</strong> connection with the surrender <strong>of</strong> the lease when the rent<br />

paid under the lease was exempt from <strong>VAT</strong>.<br />

[1993] ECR I-6665<br />

Case C-16/93<br />

3 March 1994<br />

R.J. Tolsma S Inspecteur der omzetbelast<strong>in</strong>g, Leeuwarden<br />

Article 2(1) <strong>of</strong> the Sixth Directive [...], must be <strong>in</strong>terpreted as<br />

mean<strong>in</strong>g that the 'supply <strong>of</strong> services effected for consideration'<br />

with<strong>in</strong> the mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> that provision does not <strong>in</strong>clude an activity<br />

consist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> play<strong>in</strong>g music on the public highway, for which no<br />

remuneration is stipulated, even if the musician solicits money<br />

and receives sums whose amount is however neither quantified<br />

nor quantifiable.<br />

[1994] ECR I-743<br />

Case C-38/93<br />

5 May 1994<br />

Kommanditgesellschaft <strong>in</strong> Firma K.G.H.J. Glawe Spielund<br />

Unterhaltungsgeräte Aufstellungsgesellschaft mbH<br />

& CO. S F<strong>in</strong>anzamt Hamburg-Barmbek-Uhlenhorst<br />

Article 11(A)(1)(a) <strong>of</strong> the Sixth Directive [...] must be <strong>in</strong>terpreted<br />

as mean<strong>in</strong>g that, <strong>in</strong> the case <strong>of</strong> gam<strong>in</strong>g mach<strong>in</strong>es <strong>of</strong>fer<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

possibility <strong>of</strong> w<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g, the taxable amount does not <strong>in</strong>clude the<br />

statutorily prescribed proportion <strong>of</strong> the total stakes <strong>in</strong>serted<br />

which corresponds to the w<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>gs paid out to the players.<br />

[1994] ECR I-1679<br />

Case C-33/93<br />

2 June 1994<br />

Empire Stores Limited S Commissioners <strong>of</strong> Customs and<br />

Excise<br />

Article 11(A)(1)(a) <strong>of</strong> the Sixth Directive [...] must be <strong>in</strong>terpreted<br />

as mean<strong>in</strong>g that the taxable amount <strong>in</strong> respect <strong>of</strong> an article<br />

supplied without extra charge to a person who <strong>in</strong>troduces herself<br />

or another person as a potential new customer is dist<strong>in</strong>ct from<br />

the taxable amount <strong>in</strong> respect <strong>of</strong> the goods bought from the<br />

supplier by the new customer and corresponds to the price paid<br />

by the supplier for that article.<br />

[1994] ECR I-2329<br />

Case C-4/94<br />

6 April 1995<br />

BLP Plc S Commissioners <strong>of</strong> Customs and Excise<br />

Article 2 <strong>of</strong> the First Directive [...] and Article 17 <strong>of</strong> the Sixth<br />

Directive [...], must be <strong>in</strong>terpreted as mean<strong>in</strong>g that, except <strong>in</strong><br />

the <strong>cases</strong> expressly provided for by those Directives, where a<br />

taxable person supplies services to another taxable person who<br />

uses them for an exempt transaction, the latter person is not<br />

entitled to deduct the <strong>in</strong>put <strong>VAT</strong> paid, even if the ultimate purpose<br />

<strong>of</strong> the transaction is the carry<strong>in</strong>g out <strong>of</strong> a taxable transaction.<br />

[1995] ECR I-983<br />

Case C-62/93<br />

6 July 1995<br />

BP Supergas Anonimos Eteria Geniki Emporiki<br />

Viomichaniki kai Antiprosopeion S Greek State<br />

1. Articles 2, 11 and 17 <strong>of</strong> the Sixth Directive [...], must be<br />

<strong>in</strong>terpreted as preclud<strong>in</strong>g national rules which make the<br />

importation <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ished petroleum products subject to <strong>VAT</strong><br />

calculated on the basis <strong>of</strong> a basic price different from that<br />

provided for <strong>in</strong> Article 11 <strong>of</strong> that Directive and which, by<br />

exempt<strong>in</strong>g traders <strong>in</strong> the petroleum sector from the obligation<br />

to submit returns, deprive them <strong>of</strong> the right to deduct <strong>VAT</strong><br />

charged directly on transactions relat<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>puts.<br />

2. The provisions <strong>of</strong> the Sixth Directive, <strong>in</strong> particular Articles 13<br />

to 17 there<strong>of</strong>, are to be <strong>in</strong>terpreted as preclud<strong>in</strong>g an exemption<br />

from <strong>VAT</strong> on services <strong>in</strong> respect <strong>of</strong> the transport and<br />

storage <strong>of</strong> petroleum products that are unconnected with the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!