Assessment of Planning and Retail Issues - Renfrewshire Council

Proposed Extensions 

at Braehead Retail Park, 

Braehead, Renfrew 

Assessment of 

Planning and Retail Issues 

May 2010

PROPOSED EXTENSIONS AT ASSESSMENT OF PLANNING AND RETAIL ISSUES 

BRAEHEAD RETAIL PARK MAY 2010 

C o n t e n t s 

1 Introduction 1 

3 Planning Policy Context 4 

4 Retail Impact Issues 16 

5 Conclusions 30 

Appendix: Retail Tables 1 - 24 

RDPC Limited 

PO Box 8050 

EDINBURGH 

EH5 3YS 

T: 0131 467 8050 

F: 0131 467 8051 

E: robert@rdpc.co.uk

1 INTRODUCTION 

The Proposals 

1.1 Braehead Retail Park is a well-established retail warehouse park which forms an 

integral part of the range of facilities which are available at Braehead, and which 

contribute substantially to meeting the retail, leisure, business, housing and 

employment needs of Renfrewshire. 

1.2 For many years following its opening, the retail park was not fully let, despite the 

popularity of Braehead as a retail destination. The closure of the B&Q warehouse 

further increased the vacancy levels within the retail park. Fortunately, as a result 

of extensive marketing efforts by Capital Shopping Centres (CSC) and with 

considerable assistance from Renfrewshire Council, the retail park is now fully 

occupied, and has benefited considerably from the relocation of Sainsbury’s into 

the former B&Q unit. 

1.3 Despite the recession, the retail market has held up reasonably well. Competition 

between retailers is strong, and so also is competition between major retail 

destinations. The coming on-stream of Silverburn has exerted competitive 

pressures on Braehead, and the prospect of major new retail development at 

Glasgow Harbour has made it imperative that Braehead should be able to respond 

to internal development pressures and to accommodate the needs of its tenants, 

as well as providing new opportunities where possible. 

1.4 With the retail park now fully let and trading well, with existing tenants looking to 

improve their offer and a number of prospective new tenants expressing interest 

in Braehead, there is a need to provide some additional expansion space to cater 

for these interests. CSC have identified an opportunity to strengthen the retail 

park and improve its efficiency and appearance by providing two new units at 

either end of the existing run of units, with each unit providing an additional 1,679 

square metres of gross floorspace on two levels. 

1.5 The new easternmost unit will reflect the design of the existing units and will have 

a new landscaped area adjacent to it. The proposal for the westernmost unit 

involves realignment of the adjacent roadway out of the bus station to create 

additional land for the new development and associated landscaping. The front 

past of the side wall of the new unit will be angled to follow the alignment of the 

roadway, and will incorporate a substantial area of glazing to enhance its side 

elevation, in recognition of the fact that this elevation faces across to the main 

Braehead Centre - effectively creating a ‘side frontage’ to the western end of the 

retail park units. This will greatly improve the view of the retail park from the

PROPOSED EXTENSIONS AT 2 ASSESSMENT OF PLANNING AND RETAIL ISSUES 


main centre and the bus station, and will enhance the connectivity between the 

facilities. As with the eastern unit, the main design features of the western unit will 

reflect the design of the existing buildings, so that both extensions connect 

seamlessly into the existing structures. 

1.6 Minor adjustments will be made to the road markings and traffic island at the north 

end of the bus station in order to accommodate the proposed changes, and one 

of the bus stances will be slightly repositioned. 

1.7 The opportunity will also be taken to alter and improve the footpath route at the 

west end of the retail park, making a stronger and more attractive link between 

the retail park, bus station, main centre entrance and riverside boulevard. Muchimproved 

landscaped areas will be provided in this area between the retail park 

and the riverside, and additional landscaping will also be provided where the 

roadway is being reduced in width to accommodate the western extension. The 

covered walkway which runs along the front of the retail warehouse units will be 

extended westwards across the front of the new unit, and an enlarged pedestrian 

circulation area will be provided here, in front of the unit between the car park 

and the road. 

1.8 In recognition of the fact that the amount of parking spaces provided at Braehead 

exceeds the national parking standards, no additional parking spaces are being 

proposed for this development. 

1.9 Also being proposed is a new mezzanine floor within the existing Curry’s retail unit 

at the retail park, amounting to an additional 2,323 square metres gross floorspace. 

Following discussions with officers of Renfrewshire Council, it has been agreed 

that this proposal should be brought forward by means of an application for a 

Certificate of Lawful Use or Development, on the basis that the installation of a 

mezzanine floor does not constitute development and this does not require 

planning permission. Consequently does not require to be assessed against 

current planning policy. 

1.10 CSC recognise that the installation of mezzanine floors throughout the retail park 

could, if pursued in an uncontrolled manner, raise issues of concern in relation to 

possible effects on trade in other centres. Accordingly, CSC have agreed that if 

Renfrewshire Council is minded to approve the current proposals, they will enter 

into a legal agreement with the council, the effect of which will be to prevent 

further installation of mezzanine floors in the retail park, other than any which may



be approved following the submission of formal planning applications. 

1.11 All these proposals have been discussed with the appropriate officers at 

Renfrewshire Council, and the supporting information for the applications has 

been compiled in accordance with their advice and guidance. As the applications 

constitute ‘local developments’ for the purposes of the Planning Acts, no preapplication 

notice has been issued and no design and access statement prepared. 

1.12 The next section of the report addresses the relevant planning policies to be 

applied to the extension proposals, and the third section considers retail 

expenditure and impact issues.



2 PLANNING POLICY CONTEXT 

Background 

2.1 The policy context for Braehead has been evolving over many years, from the 

original decision of the Secretary of State for Scotland to approve the proposal, 

through various statements of Scottish retail planning policy, several structure plans 

- originally for Strathclyde and latterly for Glasgow and The Clyde Valley, and the 

Renfrewshire Local Plan, leading to the now-emerging Strategic Development Plan 

for Glasgow and The Clyde Valley. 

Original Planning Decision 

2.2 The Braehead shopping and leisure centre was approved on appeal by the 

Secretary of State for Scotland in 1990. The Reporter appointed to conduct the 

public inquiry into the Braehead proposal reached the following conclusion, which 

was accepted by the Secretary of State: 

“The key policy COM1 states a preference for locating major new shopping 

proposals in or adjoining existing centres, but does not rule out the possibility of 

exceptions, or of new additions to the hierarchy. The 1988 alteration to the 

structure plan proposes two new shopping centres that would be additions to the 

hierarchy. The sheer size of the Braehead scheme would give it sufficient status 

to be considered as part of the hierarchy, at about Tier 2 level. This distinguishes 

it from smaller shopping developments at sporadic locations that would dissipate 

and dilute shopping provision away from the recognised centres, without creating 

worthwhile focal points that would function as new centres. For this reason, 

Braehead would not set a precedent for other smaller retail developments”. 

2.3 Although the Secretary of State approved the Braehead development in 1990 on 

the basis that it would function as a new centre in the shopping hierarchy, the 

centre itself did not open until October 1999. The first Structure Plan to emerge 

following the opening of Braehead - the new Glasgow & The Clyde Valley 

Structure Plan - overlooked the fact that the centre had opened and was now a 

major element in the shopping hierarchy. However the Scottish Ministers, when 

approving the plan in 2002, inserted additional wording into the plan regarding 

Braehead:



“It is recognised that the Braehead Shopping Centre is playing a valuable catalytic 

role in relation to the redevelopment of the Renfrew Riverside. In due course the 

Braehead Shopping Centre is likely to assume certain town centre functions in 

respect of the wider Renfrew Riverside area. The role and function of the 

shopping centre will be monitored by the Joint Committee”. 

2.4 In the eight years since this statement was inserted into the Structure Plan by 

Scottish Ministers, the Braehead Centre has cemented its position as the primary 

retail destination in Renfrewshire, as a major focus for employment and leisure, 

and as the heart of a growing residential and business community in the Renfrew 

Riverside area. Its catalytic role in driving forward the regeneration of this area 

remains crucial, hence the need to ensure that facilities such as the retail park can 

evolve and respond positively to tenants’ needs and changing market conditions. 

The Relationship of Centres in North Renfrewshire 

2.5 While Paisley town centre’s role has changed over the past twenty years, it was 

recognised in a recent study (the 2006 Yellow Book study into a strategy for 

Paisley’s regeneration and transformation, commissioned by Renfrewshire Council, 

Paisley Vision Board and Scottish Enterprise Renfrewshire) that it cannot be 

expected to return to the role it once held. The changes in Paisley town centre’s 

role and function were evident in advance of the opening of Braehead, due to the 

increasing popularity of Glasgow City Centre and other major centres such as East 

Kilbride. The Yellow Book study stressed that Paisley town centre needed to 

focus on its strengths and shift its focus, particularly in relation to retailing, by 

concentrating on the ‘value retail’ sector of the market, and on serving the needs 

of those living and working in the town centre. The study recommended that 

redevelopment efforts should be focused on residential and mixed use schemes, 

and that there should be an effort to increase evening activity with more cafes and 

restaurants. 

2.6 In future, the broadest range of retail and leisure facilities in Renfrewshire will be 

best met by playing to the strengths of each centre - Paisley, Renfrew and 

Braehead - in order to maximise the investment potential of the area as a whole. 

The promotion of the three centres in accordance with a strategy which maintains 

and develops their complementary functions will ensure that each centre can 

benefit from the others, while consumers will be able to enjoy the combined 

strengths of all three.



National Planning Framework for Scotland 2 

2.7 The second National Planning Framework for Scotland (NPF2) was issued by the 

Scottish Government in its final approved form in June 2009. It provides the 

national policy context for development plans and sets out a long-term strategy for 

sustainable development in Scotland over the next two decades. 

2.8 Central to the promotion of sustainable development and economic prosperity for 

Scotland is the need to regenerate areas of brownfield land which are not fully 

contributing to economic growth, promote urban investment, and create new 

employment opportunities. Braehead has been at the core of radical and 

substantial urban renewal and economic regeneration at Renfrew Riverside, and 

remains a key element in the drive to breathe new life into the Clyde Corridor. 

NPF2 confirms, in paragraph 87, that the Clyde Corridor - encompassing the 

major regeneration initiatives along the Clyde Gateway and the Clyde Waterfront - 

is the national strategic regeneration priority. In paragraph 196 NPF2 recognises 

the new community growth which is emerging in North Renfrew - a community 

which would not be developing in the absence of Braehead. Consolidation of 

development and continued job creation at Braehead is key to its continued 

contribution to the success of Scotland’s top regeneration priority. 

Scottish Planning Policy - Town Centres and Retailing 

2.9 Since approval of the Braehead development in 1990, there have been four 

Scottish planning policy statements on retailing, comprising two versions of 

National Planning Policy Guideline No.8 - Town Centres and Retailing (NPPG8), 

Scottish Planning Policy No.8 - Town Centres and Retailing (SPP8), and most 

recently the consolidated Scottish Planning Policy statement (SPP) issued in 

February 2010. 

2.10 The consolidated SPP sets out national planning policies for all development 

sectors, including retailing. The section on Town Centres and Retailing generally 

follows the policies contained in SPP8, emphasising the importance of supporting 

town centres, and advising planning authorities to define a ‘Network of Centres’ 

- comprising town centres, commercial centres and other local centres - which 

will meet the retail needs of the area, and which will provide the context for 

assessment of proposals for new development.



2.11 Paragraph 63 of the SPP explains that development proposals in edge-of-centre 

or commercial centre locations should be assessed having regard to the availability 

of more central locations and the potential impact on existing centres. In relation 

to new developments which are contrary to the development plan, the planning 

authority should ensure that the sequential approach to retail site selection has 

been used, there is no unacceptable individual or cumulative impact on the vitality 

and viability of the identified network of centres, the proposal will help to meet 

qualitative and quantitative deficiencies identified in the development plan, and will 

not conflict with other significant objectives of the development plan or other 

relevant strategies. A retail impact analysis is required for a development 

proposed outside a town centre which is not in accord with the development plan. 

2.12 All the relevant issues raised by the SPP are addressed as part of the following 

assessment of the current proposals against the requirements of the development 

plan. 

Glasgow and The Clyde Valley Structure Plan 

2.13 The Third Alteration to the Glasgow and The Clyde Valley Structure Plan was 

approved with modifications by Ministers in 2008, but was then altered again by 

the Fourth Alteration, approved by Ministers in March 2009. This Fourth 

Alteration had the effect of designating Braehead as a ‘Commercial Centre’, 

meaning that - for the purposes of applying the sequential approach - Braehead is 

a third choice location for new development after town centres and edge-ofcentre 

locations, but in preference to out-of-centre locations. 

2.14 However, so far as proposals to expand existing facilities are concerned, paragraph 

62 of the SPP makes clear that the sequential approach only applies if the 

extension proposals “are of a scale or form sufficient to change their role and 

function”. In this case the proposals involve only two relatively modest extensions 

at either end of the existing run of buildings, in order to improve the ability of the 

retail park to respond to a highly competitive marketplace, accommodate interest 

from retailers who otherwise are likely to choose to locate outside Renfrewshire, 

and to cater for the evolving needs of existing tenants. The proposals are not of 

a scale or form sufficient to change the role and function of the retail park, or of 

Braehead as a whole, and accordingly the sequential approach does not apply in 

this instance. 

2.15 In any case it is clear that it would not be possible to enhance the retail park or



cater for the requirements of existing tenants by constructing new retail units in 

another part of Renfrewshire. 

Clyde Waterfront Initiative 

2.16 In setting the overall strategic context for any new development at Braehead, the 

‘Clyde Waterfront Initiative’ is one of three ‘Metropolitan Flagship Initiatives’ 

promoted by the Structure Plan. A central element of the Clyde Waterfront 

Initiative is “building upon the catalytic role of Braehead regional leisure and 

shopping centre in the regeneration of Renfrew Riverside”. These current 

proposals will promote the continued contribution of Braehead to economic 

regeneration in this area of Renfrewshire. 

Development Management Policies 

2.17 Strategic Policy 9 in the Structure Plan sets out the criteria which a development 

proposal should satisfy in order to be regarded as in accordance with the plan. For 

retail development proposals which are likely to be ‘significant’ - i.e. those 

comprising comparison floorspace of more than 2,000 square metres - it is 

necessary to demonstrate that (A) the case for the development has been 

established, (B) the location is appropriate, and (C) infrastructure requirements 

have been met. 

2.18 In this case, each planning application is proposing a development of less than 

2,000 square metres, and thus neither application exceeds the Structure Plan’s 

definition of a ‘significant’ development. However as the combined total of both 

applications exceeds 2,000 square metres, it is appropriate to consider the 

proposals against Strategic Policy 9. 

2.19 Dealing firstly with the ‘A’ criteria relating to the case for the development, the 

first test is the extent to which the proposals satisfy the criteria set out in Schedule 

6(c)(I) of the Structure Plan. The first two criteria relate to the balance of 

expenditure and turnover in the relevant catchment area and the potential impact 

on any town centre listed in the Network of Town Centres. These issues are 

considered in the next section of this report, which shows that there is adequate 

retail expenditure within the Braehead catchment area to support the new 

developments and that there will be no adverse impact on any existing town 

centre.



2.20 The third criterion relates to out-of-centre development proposals and thus is not 

relevant to a proposal in a Commercial Centre. 

2.21 Criterion (d) requires consideration of the contribution of the proposals to the 

improvement of the vitality or viability of town centres, and functional relationship 

to existing town centres. It is accepted that the proposals, being located in a 

Commercial Centre, do not directly result in the improvement of any town 

centre, but nor are they likely to have any adverse effect. By achieving a modest 

enhancement of the quality and attractiveness of the retail park compared to other 

major retail parks outside Renfrewshire, they will help to underpin and extend the 

substantial investment in Renfrew Riverside which the overall Braehead 

development has delivered, complementing its regenerative benefits and thereby 

indirectly benefiting Renfrew. It is particularly encouraging that Capital Shopping 

Centres believe that additional investment can be attracted to Renfrew Riverside 

so soon after a very severe recession. 

2.22 The proposals are for bulky goods retail floorspace only and thus will conform to 

criterion (e) in Schedule 6(c)(I). 

2.23 As regards criterion (f), which requires consideration of the appropriateness of 

locating new bulky goods retailing at Commercial Centres, and their suitability for 

access by means other than the private car, these proposals seek only to modestly 

consolidate an existing established bulky goods retail location - it being recognised 

in paragraph 12.24 of the Structure Plan that the retail warehouse parks were 

established to accommodate bulky goods retail outlets which could not be 

accommodated in or adjoining town centres. The Braehead Retail Park is highly 

accessible by non-car modes, being located immediately adjacent to Braehead Bus 

Station, and also served by the frequent buses which run between Braehead, 

Govan and Glasgow. The proposals will also enhance the appearance of the 

existing retail warehousing at Braehead. 

2.24 Criterion (g) is not relevant as it relates to retail parks next to town centres. 

Criterion (h) relates to the requirements of Strategic Policies 3 (Strategic 

Management of Travel Demands) and 9B(vi) (Promotion of Sustainable Transport), 

and it is considered that these proposals comply with these policies by focusing 

new retail warehousing in a location already well served by buses, and in a way 

which is unlikely to generate significant extra trips by car, but rather result in 

longer dwell times by customers. Furthermore they should reduce the likelihood 

of car-borne visitors needing to visit other retail warehouse parks in order to



compare potential purchases, and - because the proposals do not involve any new 

parking spaces - will ensure a reduction in the ratio of parking spaces per square 

metre of floorspace at Braehead, thus further promoting sustainable travel 

patterns. 

2.25 Criterion (I) is not relevant as it does not relate to retail warehouse locations, and 

the current proposals could not achieve the enhancement of the Braehead Retail 

Park if they were located in any of the locations listed in Schedule 6(c)(iv). 

2.26 Criterion (j) refers to the contribution of the development to remedying any 

qualitative deficiencies in existing retail provision. Given that there have been no 

improvements to the retail park since it was constructed, other than one minor 

unit subdivision, and that other retail warehousing destinations have been 

established and/or significantly improved since then, it is considered that the 

Braehead Retail Park has become disadvantaged in qualitative terms, and that 

some enhancement is long overdue. 

2.27 Criterion (k) does not apply. 

2.28 Turning now to the ‘B’ criteria relating to whether the location of the 

development is appropriate, the relevant tests are to ensure that the vitality and 

viability of town centres is safeguarded and promoted by applying the sequential 

approach, promote sustainable transport, avoid risk of flooding, avoid negative 

impact on health and safety, and contribute to the implementation of the air quality 

strategy. 

2.29 We have already discussed the sequential approach and the fact that the SPP 

indicates that it does not apply in this instance. So far as the Structure Plan’s policy 

on the sequential approach is concerned, as set out in Schedule 6(c)(ii), as 

amended by the Fourth Alteration, this states that the preference should be for 

town centre sites where sites or buildings suitable for conversion are available, and 

that locations which are easily accessible by a choice of means of transport, 

especially public transport, should be preferred. In this case it is clear that it would 

not be possible to enhance the Braehead Retail Park using sites or buildings 

elsewhere in Renfrewshire. The location is easily accessible and well served by 

public transport. 

2.30 We commented previously on the ways in which the proposals will promote 

sustainable transport. Drainage information is being submitted with the



applications to address the flood risk issue. There are no health and safety 

implications, nor do the proposals give rise to any significant air quality 

implications, particularly as the location is readily accessible by public transport and 

the traffic generating effects of the developments are expected to be very modest. 

2.31 Finally, as regards the ‘C’ criteria relating to infrastructure requirements, the 

transport assessment and drainage reports submitted with the applications set out 

the provision being made to address the infrastructure requirements of the 

proposals. 

2.32 Consequently it is considered that the proposals satisfy the criteria set down in 

Strategic Policy 9 of the Structure Plan, and thus do not constitute a departure 

from the plan. 

Local Plan Policy 

2.33 The Renfrewshire Local Plan was adopted in 2006. It recognises a hierarchy of 

town centres comprising strategic town centres and secondary centres, 

neighbourhood shops, out of centre retailing, and - as a separate category - the 

Braehead Regional Shopping Centre and Leisure Centre. The plan recognises that 

Braehead is ‘not currently included in the Structure Plan’s Network of Town 

Centres’, and that ‘while the non-retail development on Renfrew Riverside will be 

encouraged, the role and function of the regional shopping centre will be 

monitored by the Structure Plan Joint Committee’. 

2.34 The local plan pre-dates the designation of Braehead as a Commercial Centre in 

the Structure Plan and the adjusted policies associated with that designation. It 

refers to Braehead as an out-of-centre retail location, which is no longer correct. 

2.35 Paragraph 7.11 in the Local Plan confirms the policy objective of maintaining the 

regional centre at Braehead. There are four policies of direct relevance to the 

current proposals - policies R1, R2, R13 and R16. 

2.36 Policy R1 states that town centre uses will be directed to the strategic and 

secondary centres in Renfrewshire, and that all proposals for town centre uses will 

be considered against the criteria specified in Table R1. Policy R2 states that 

‘significant’ shopping developments of more than 2,000 square metres of 

comparison floorspace will be directed to the strategic town centres to support 

their vitality and viability, and will be assessed against relevant Structure Plan



policies. 

2.37 Policy R13 relates to the retail warehouse parks in the plan areas, and states that 

there will be a presumption against proposals for additional floorspace beyond the 

level specified in current consents for these areas. Because the policy pre-dates 

the Fourth Alteration to the Structure Plan, it does not take account of the fact 

that the retail warehouse parks are now Commercial Centres. It also does not 

take account of the advice in the SPP that investment to maintain and improve 

Commercial Centres should be supported where the centres are part of the 

network of centres and where such investment will not undermine town centres. 

This advice in the SPP makes clear that it is no longer appropriate to impose 

blanket presumptions against additional development in Commercial Centres. 

2.38 Policy R16 refers specifically to the Braehead Regional Shopping and Leisure 

Centre and confirms that the centre is allocated for the uses specified in the 

planning permissions for the centre. It also states that “Proposals for additional 

development in the specified categories will be supported where they satisfy the 

provisions of structure plan policy, and the criteria in Table R1" (these criteria 

listed in Table R1 relate to the sequential approach, capacity and impact issues, 

traffic and sustainable transport, amenity, design, environmental impact and 

infrastructure provision). 

Assessment of the Proposals Against Policy 

2.39 The proposals will be in accordance with the support given by the Local Plan to 

maintaining the Regional Centre at Braehead, which is now endorsed by the 

Structure Plan’s recognition of Braehead as a Commercial Centre and, in Schedule 

6(c)(I)(c), the importance of protecting Braehead from new out-of-centre 

developments. Although the local plan distinguishes between the main Braehead 

Centre and the retail park, and has different policies for each element, the 

designation of both parts of Braehead’s retail offer as Commercial Centres 

removes any remaining justification for treating the two elements separately. Thus 

it is appropriate to consider the relevance of both policies R13 and R16 to the 

current proposal, as well as Policies R1 and R2. 

Policy R1 

2.40 Dealing firstly with Policy R1, which directs town centre uses to the strategic and 

secondary centres, these proposals require to be assessed against the criteria set



out in Table R1 in the Local Plan. 

2.41 The first criterion listed in Table R1 relates to the sequential approach, and this 

issue has already been fully addressed. The second and third criteria refer to 

whether the proposal can be supported by the catchment population and the likely 

impact of the proposal on other centres, and these matters are addressed in the 

next section of the report. We have also discussed the fourth criterion relating to 

the need to achieve sustainable transport, and the fifth criterion relating to 

adequacy of arrangements for traffic circulation and parking is being addressed in 

the transport assessment. There are no implications for the amenity of any nearby 

properties, so the sixth criterion is satisfied, and the quality of design has been 

addressed in the first section of this report, thus addressing the seventh criterion. 

2.42 There are no particular environmental effects associated with the proposal which 

require special consideration, beyond the discussions already presented, and all 

implications for infrastructure are addressed in the reports on drainage and 

transport, thus satisfying the eighth and ninth criteria. 

2.43 It is important to note that Policy R1 requires the tests in Table R1 to be applied 

to all proposals for town centre uses, regardless of their proposed location. In this 

case the tests laid down in the table are all satisfied by the current proposals. 

Policy R2 

2.44 Turning to Policy R2, this indicates that significant shopping developments of more 

than 2,000 square metres comparison floorspace should be directed to the 

strategic town centres and that such proposals will be tested against relevant 

Structure Plan policies. As has been noted, the two applications to which this 

statement relates are each proposing developments of less than 2,000 square 

metres, but it is appropriate to consider the implications of Policy R2 given that the 

proposals in combination amount to more than 2,000 square metres. A full 

analysis of all the relevant Structure Plan policies has already been carried out, and 

the proposals have been shown to comply with Strategic Policy 9, which means 

that they also comply with the tests imposed by Policy R2. 

Policy R13 

2.45 It has been noted earlier that the presumption in the Policy R13 against additional 

floorspace at the retail park does not accord with the advice contained in the SPP



relating to support for investment in Commercial Centres. Furthermore this 

proposal is being taken forward only on the basis that approval of the additional 

retail floorspace will result in the prevention, by legal agreement, of any additional 

internal mezzanine floors in the retail park which otherwise could be installed 

without requiring planning permission. Thus the result of approving these 

proposals will be to reinforce the effectiveness of Policy R13, notwithstanding its 

non-compliance with the SPP. 

2.46 Consequently, although the proposal amounts to a departure from Policy R13, it 

is considered that the departure is not significant, because (1) the additional 

floorspace is far less than could be provided by way of mezzanine floors in the 

retail park, which in future will be under the full control of the council because of 

the effect of the new legal agreement, and (2) in the light of national retail planning 

policy set out in the SPP, it is no longer appropriate to impose blanket 

presumptions against additional retail floorspace at the Braehead Retail Park, which 

is now designated as a Commercial Centre. 

Policy R16 

2.47 Policy R16 is described in the Local Plan as referring to the “area of the Braehead 

shopping mall and indoor sports area, with associated parking”. The area-specific 

wording dates from around eight years ago when the Local Plan was finalised prior 

to the Local Plan Inquiry. Following the inquiry, the Reporter appointed to 

conduct the inquiry and make recommendations to the council concluded that the 

whole of Braehead should be included in a single planning policy area reflecting its 

strategic importance, rather than having two separate policies for the mall and 

retail park. The Reporter’s recommendation was not accepted at the time by the 

council, primarily because the Structure Plan also had separate policies for the mall 

and retail park. However the Fourth Alteration of the Structure Plan has 

designated both Braehead Centre and the retail park as two adjoining Commercial 

Centres, which combine to make one single centre, and thus it is logical that Policy 

R16 should apply to the centre as a whole. Furthermore the title ‘Braehead 

Regional Shopping and Leisure Centre’ is customarily taken to apply to Braehead 

Centre, the retail park, IKEA and Xscape - comprising all of Braehead’s retail and 

leisure elements. 

2.48 It is relevant that the proposal to relocate the Sainsbury’s superstore into the 

former B&Q Warehouse in the retail park was assessed by the council against the 

terms of Policy R16, reinforcing the view that the policy should be applied to the



whole of Braehead. 

2.49 Policy R16 states that Braehead is allocated for the uses specified in the original 

planning permission, and that additional development proposals will be supported 

when they satisfy the Structure Plan and the criteria in Table R1. As has been 

shown earlier, the current proposals satisfy both the Structure Plan and the tests 

in Table R1. Therefore it is in accord with Policy R16. 

Policy Conclusions 

2.50 Braehead is one of the principal drivers of economic regeneration in Scotland’s 

national strategic regeneration priority area - the Clyde Corridor - and is a vital 

long-term catalyst for regeneration and renewal in Renfrewshire. The approved 

Structure Plan make clears the continuing importance of that catalytic benefit in 

maintaining progress with urban renewal along the Clyde Waterfront. This in turn 

means ensuring that investment can continue to be attracted to Braehead. 

Similarly the Local Plan recognises the importance of maintaining the Braehead 

asset for the benefit of Renfrewshire. 

2.51 The current proposals for the retail park satisfy the tests laid down in the Structure 

Plan’s Strategic Policy 9 (which in turn ensures compliance with other relevant 

policies in the Structure Plan), and they do not amount to a material departure 

from the provisions of the Local Plan - subject to the expenditure and impact 

issues which are addressed in the following section of this report.



3 RETAIL IMPACT ISSUES 

3.1 The proposals which are the subject of applications for planning permission and 

a Certificate of Lawful Use or Development involve the introduction of two retail 

warehouse units each of 1,679 square metres gross retail floorspace, and 2,323 

square metres for the Currys mezzanine floor. The combined floorspace of the 

two retail units exceeds the 2,500 square metres gross floorspace which Scottish 

Planning Policy dictates should be the subject of a retail impact analysis, and 

accordingly such an analysis has been carried out. Although the Curry’s mezzanine 

floor does not constitute development and is not the subject of a planning 

application, for the sake of completeness - and in order to address cumulative 

impact issues - the retail impact analysis takes account of the proposed additional 

floorspace within the Curry’s unit. 

3.2 Again for cumulative impact reasons, It is also appropriate to take account of the 

recent relocation of the Sainsbury’s store from the main Braehead Centre to the 

former B&Q unit at the east end of the retail park, with the subsequent re-use of 

the former Sainsbury’s store by another retailer - Primark, the clothing store. 

3.3 For this reason our analysis is based on the retail impact study which was 

undertaken by this practice in 2008 to assess the potential trade diversions 

resulting from the Sainsbury relocation, but taking account of the effects of the 

economic recession which were not anticipated in July 2008. It then continues by 

building in the additional effect of the current proposals. 

3.4 The 2008 study did not consider the effect of the transfer of the convenience 

(food, drink and groceries) element of the Sainsbury’s operation, because the 

consequent increase in convenience turnover was estimated to be relatively 

insignificant. Similarly with the current proposals, no food sales are proposed and 

therefore no convenience impact assessment is being undertaken. 

3.5 Furthermore, and unlike the Sainsbury’s relocation proposal, the current proposal 

only involves additional ‘bulky goods’ retail floorspace - i.e. the sale of furniture, 

textiles / soft furnishings and lighting, carpets and floor coverings, electrical goods, 

DIY / hardware goods, and automotive accessories - essentially replacing some of 

the bulky goods floorspace which was formerly provided by the B&Q warehouse. 

Consequently the effect of the trade diversions will be more focused on those 

retail locations which specialise in the sale of bulky goods.



Catchment Area 

3.6 Braehead has an extensive catchment area, because of its unique retail 

characteristics and its associated leisure operations. The retail park is a less 

powerful attraction than the main centre because of its more restricted range of 

goods and because there are other retail parks serving the West of Scotland, but 

it benefits from being immediately adjacent to the main centre and the Braehead 

Bus Station, and because it includes the only IKEA store in the West of Scotland. 

For that reason Braehead Retail Park also has a wide catchment area. 

3.7 The results of the household shopping survey undertaken in preparation for the 

Third Alteration to the Structure Plan revealed that Braehead draws trade from 

a significant part of the Greater Glasgow area, but focused on the western and 

southern parts - the Paisley / Renfrew catchment in particular, but to a lesser 

extent the Glasgow South / Newton Mearns area and the Glasgow North West / 

Clydebank area. 

3.8 Other areas send relatively little of their trade to Braehead, but we have included 

the Bishopbriggs, Greenock, Dumbarton, East Kilbride and Argyll & Bute areas 

within the main catchment because of the collective contribution which - 

according to the household survey - these areas make to Braehead’s overall 

turnover - amounting to around 15% from these areas combined. No other areas 

make any significant contribution to Braehead’s catchment, although the centre 

also draws a modest proportion of its trade from many other parts of Scotland and 

also Northern Ireland. 

Population Estimates 

3.9 Table 1 sets out the population estimates for the main catchment area, using data 

contained in the technical reports which support the Glasgow & Clyde Valley 

Structure Plan. The table shows the projected changes in population within each 

of the centre catchment areas from 2006 to the structure plan horizon date of 

2011, the estimates for 2008 and 2010 being pro-rata estimates derived from the 

2006 and 2011 figures. We have then estimated the population for 2012 from the 

projections contained in the latest (2010) Scottish population projections from the 

General Registrar’s Office (GRO). The estimates show a small decline in 

population over the 6 year period. 

3.10 We have selected 2012 as the year in which to assess the potential impact of the



proposals, on the assumption that all the new retail floorspace will have been 

provided and occupied by then, and the retailers will have achieved an established 

and settled trading situation. 

Expenditure Estimates 

3.11 Using 2005 retail expenditure estimates for the 10 minute and 20 drive time 

isochrone areas around Braehead, provided by the MapInfo (now Pitney Bowes) 

organisation, and by referring to expenditure growth projections also provided by 

Pitney Bowes in their Retail Expenditure Guide 2009/10, published in September 

2009, it is possible to project the growth in spending for each of the main 

comparison goods categories for the period from 2005 to 2012. 

3.12 The projections to 2008 are based on actual recorded expenditure growth during 

that period, showing an overall increase of around 15% in real terms from 2005 

to 2008. However from 2008 to 2012 the expenditure projections rely on careful 

interpretation of the various economic indicators which are available. 

3.13 The Pitney Bowes Retail Expenditure Guide 2009/10 contains two sets of 

expenditure forecasts - one based on PB’s own research and the other produced 

by Oxford Economics. The latter forecasts are not solely based on past trends but 

also take account of prevailing socio-economic factors. However they were 

produced at a time when the UK was still in the depths of recession and 

accordingly are very pessimistic. Furthermore the government’s Office for 

National Statistics monitor of retail spending by volume (i.e. excluding changes in 

prices) shows that growth in spending on non-food goods increased by 3% in real 

terms in 2008 and 4% in 2009, with positive indications that retail growth is 

holding up in 2010. Consequently the Oxford Economics projection of a 

reduction in comparison spending of 2.7% per annum from 2008 to 2010, and an 

average rate of growth of only 1.6% per annum from 2008 to 2014, now appears 

unrealistic. 

3.14 In contrast, the Pitney Bowes estimates, based solely on past trends, suggests a 

growth rate of between 4.9% and 5.5% per annum from 2008, based on longterm 

(1978-2008) and medium-term (1988-2008) trends. These too appear 

unrealistic, but in a too-positive rather than too-negative way. 

3.15 Accordingly we have applied a growth rate of 3.5% per annum for the period 

2008 to 2012, being the average of the growth recorded by the Office for National



Statistics during the two ‘recession years’, and below even the most cautious of 

the trend projections published by Pitney Bowes (which range from 3.9% ultra 

long term to 6.6% short term). 

3.16 The variations in spending between the 10 and 20 minute drive-time areas are not 

substantial, and thus their allocation to the different catchment areas is not critical, 

but we have applied the figures according to the allocation shown in Table 1, with 

Paisley / Renfrew, Glasgow NW / Clydebank and Glasgow South / Newton Mearns 

catchments being in the 0-10 drive time and the others in the 10-20 minute area. 

3.17 By applying the expenditure estimates in Table 2 to the population projections in 

Table 1, we are able to estimate the amount of comparison spending available for 

each category of product for the years 2008, 2010 and 2012. Table 3 shows that 

total available comparison spending in the main catchment will reach more than 

£4,200 million this year and £4,500 million in 2012 (at 2005 prices), representing 

a £300 million increase in two years, even on the basis of the modest growth 

forecasts which we have adopted. Table 3 also shows that comparison 

expenditure growth in the Paisley / Renfrew catchment will be considerable, rising 

from £810 million in 2008 to £915 million by 2012, an increase of more than £100 

million over four years, despite the very lean growth period from 2008 to 2010. 

Shopping Patterns 

3.18 The next stage of the analysis is to estimate the likely distribution of comparison 

expenditure around the main catchment area, using the results of the 2003 

household survey which was undertaken in the structure plan area. In Tables 4 to 

7 we have used these survey results but applied them to the estimated available 

spending in 2008 - i.e. we have assumed that the shopping patterns of 2003 will 

remain the same until 2008. Later in the analysis we will address any likely changes 

in shopping patterns which need to be taken into account. 

3.19 By applying the estimates of available expenditure in 2008 to the results of the 

household survey for each shopping catchment area, we are able to produce 

tables of spending in each shopping destination for each product category (Tables 

4 to 7). The distribution of spending varies considerably from product to product, 

so that for example Glasgow city centre attracts 46% of all available spending on 

clothing in the catchment, but only 12.6% of spending on electrical goods. In the 

Paisley / Renfrew catchment, Braehead is revealed as the most popular destination 

for all the product categories in 2003, but Paisley is also shown to be performing



quite strongly for most categories. Tables 4 to 7 also show that some 21% of 

expenditure on clothing originating in the Paisley / Renfrew catchment was lost to 

Glasgow city centre in 2003, but that leakage on electrical goods was less than 4% 

and on furniture and floor coverings was less than 6%. Were it not for Braehead, 

it is likely that leakage of spending on clothing out of Renfrewshire - to Glasgow 

in particular - would have been very much higher than the level shown in the 2003 

household survey results. 

3.20 It will be evident from table 3 that spending on clothing, electrical goods, DIY, 

furniture and floor coverings only accounted for around two-thirds of all 

comparison spending in 2003. However the household survey results do not 

cover shopping patterns for the remaining categories of goods, and consequently 

it is necessary to use the survey results for the main categories of goods as a guide 

to the likely pattern of spending for other goods. For spending on other 

'mainstream' High Street goods we have used similar proportions of spending 

distribution to clothing spending, but weighted more towards local town centres 

and less to Glasgow city centre. For spending on other types of bulky goods we 

have used the average of spending on the main categories of bulky goods. The 

resultant calculations are shown in tables 8 and 9. 

Estimated Turnover in Existing Shopping Destinations 

3.21 By pulling together the output spending figures from tables 4 to 9, we are able to 

produce Table 10 which contains an estimate of total comparison spending from 

each catchment zone to each destination. In most cases this estimated spend will 

be equivalent to the turnover of that centre. However some centres will draw 

some of their trade from outside the main Braehead catchment, and this should 

be borne in mind when considering the likely total turnover of those centres. For 

Braehead we have estimated the amount of additional trade likely to be drawn to 

the centre from outside the catchment, based on many years of working on retail 

planning projects for the centre. For Glasgow city centre, which will draw a great 

deal of its trade from areas outside the Braehead catchment, we have used the 

total turnover as estimated in the capacity analysis set out in the Glasgow City 

Plan, adjusted to the 2005 prices used in our analysis, and then projected to 2008 

using actual growth rates and assuming the same market share as the City Plan 

estimates for 2006. This calculation is detailed in Table 11, and shows a total 

turnover of £1,630 million in 2008, of which £1,051 million comes from the main 

Braehead catchment.



3.22 As well as providing a good indication of the likely turnover of each centre, 

assuming no changes to the shopping patterns which prevailed in 2003, Table 10 

is useful in showing the nature of each centre's trade draw - i.e the proportion of 

its turnover drawn from each catchment zone. For Glasgow city centre the trade 

is drawn widely from across the whole area, whereas Paisley's trade draw is very 

concentrated within its own catchment. 

3.23 One anomaly in the household survey results is in relation to Renfrew, where a 

number of respondents indicated that they visited Renfrew for a variety of bulky 

goods purchases. This resulted in an estimated turnover for Renfrew town centre 

which was much higher than would be expected for such a centre. However it 

is likely that some survey respondents specified 'Renfrew' when they actually 

meant either Braehead (including the retail park and IKEA) or one of the two retail 

parks near Renfrew (Blythswood or Abbotsinch). For this reason we have made 

minor adjustments to the distribution of comparison spend to compensate for this 

anomaly. 

3.24 Table 12 presents the market share which would be likely to be achieved by each 

shopping destination from each catchment - i.e. the proportion of available 

spending from each zone which is captured by each centre - in 2008, assuming 

that 2003 shopping patterns prevailed. This shows Paisley and Braehead sharing 

roughly equal market shares (Paisley capturing 24% of the available comparison 

trade in the catchment and Braehead 23%), with Braehead Retail Park and IKEA 

at 12%. The combined attractions of all the centres in the Paisley catchment 

achieve a total market share of nearly 80%, with only 10.6% being exported to 

Glasgow. This represents a huge improvement in expenditure retention 

compared with pre-Braehead days, and emphasises how important Braehead and 

its facilities had become in Renfrewshire by 2003. 

3.25 Table 12 also shows that, on the basis of the 2003 survey results, Braehead Retail 

Park including IKEA accounts for around one-third of the total retail trade drawn 

to Braehead. 

The Effect of Floorspace Changes in the Paisley Area 

3.26 For the Sainsbury’s relocation analysis in 2008, Renfrewshire Council supplied a list 

of anticipated retail floorspace changes in the Paisley area which required to be 

built into the model of expenditure distribution. The most significant ones were 

the redevelopment of the Arnott’s site in Paisley town centre, a 12,000 square



metre extension to Phoenix Retail Park, and a 4,995 square metre extension to 

Abbotsinch Retail Park. We also included the additional floorspace provided by 

Marks and Spencer at Braehead. Against these additions to retail floorspace had 

to be balanced the reduction in floorspace resulting from closure of the Arnott’s 

department store and Littlewoods in Paisley town centre. The amount of gross 

comparison floorspace estimated in Paisley town centre after allowing for 

floorspace reductions and the redevelopment of Arnott’s was 46,775 square 

metres. 

3.27 Using these figures we produced Tables 13 and 14. Table 13 allowed for 

reductions in floorspace in Paisley town centre, as revealed from the council’s 

surveys of 2003 and 2008, while Table 14 showed the likely effect of the 

introduction of new approved floorspace in the Paisley area, by making 

appropriate adjustments to the market shares achieved by each shopping 

destination to allow for these floorspace changes. Unfortunately the more recent 

floorspace survey figures were not directly comparable with the ones from 2003 

because of a change in the geographical extent of the area being surveyed, which 

results in Paisley town centre’s turnover appearing to drop more dramatically - 

when comparing Table 13 with Table 14 - than it would have done in reality. 

However Table 13 provides a reasonable estimate of the base turnover of Paisley 

town centre before allowing for the implementation of new developments. 

3.28 A comparison of Table 13 with Table 14 shows that the implementation of 

commitments would be likely to result in Paisley town centre’s turnover increasing 

from its low point of £166 million, following floorspace closures, to around £180 

million, with Abbotsinch Retail Park increasing its turnover by around £12 million 

and Phoenix Retail Park by £28.5 million. The combined turnover of Braehead 

Mall and Retail Park drawn from the main catchment area reduces by £27 million. 

Council surveys show a very substantial reduction in Renfrew town centre’s 

comparison floorspace between 2003 and 2008, and this is also reflected in Table 

14 - although the scale of the reduction suggests that the two surveys are not 

compatible in terms of the geographical areas to which they relate, as is the case 

in Paisley town centre 

The Effect of Silverburn 

3.29 The next stage in the exercise in 2008 was to build in the effect of Silverburn 

shopping centre at Pollok to the model of shopping patterns. Although the centre 

was not yet fully let, we were able to produce an estimate of its likely trading



potential when fully let, on the assumption that this would be achieved by 2010 (in 

reality Silverburn is now largely let, with only a few vacant units). 

3.30 Table 15 sets out our estimate of the altered shopping patterns after allowing for 

the Silverburn effect, adjusted to take account of the changed expenditure 

estimates compared with the previous analysis. It is estimated that the centre 

would have achieved a turnover of £275 million from the Braehead main 

catchment in 2008 if fully let, resulting in a 20% reduction in Braehead’s turnover 

potential, and a 5.4% impact on Paisley’s comparison trade. East Kilbride is 

estimated to lose around 18% of its comparison trade drawn from the Braehead 

catchment, and Glasgow City Centre 5.4%. Our estimates are based on the likely 

market penetration of Silverburn into each catchment, having regard to the nature 

of the facilities in those catchments and their distance from Silverburn, and also 

having regard to the extent to which shoppers living in the Pollok area were 

making trips to other shopping destinations when surveyed in 2003. 

Expenditure Growth to 2010 

3.31 Table 16 takes the estimated changes in shopping patterns following the opening 

of Silverburn, and simply rolls forward those patterns from 2008 to 2010, so we 

can see how the various spending flows would be higher in 2010 as a result of 

expenditure growth, assuming no change in shopping habits or floorspace 

provision. Overall turnover generated from catchment spending increases from 

£3,985 million to £4,216 million. 

Effect of City Centre Commitments 

3.32 As previously explained, Table 11 shows the estimated turnover of the city centre 

in 2008, after allowing for the implementation of commitments assumed by the 

Glasgow City Plan. However the latest estimates produced by Glasgow City 

Council (GCC Factsheet, July 2009) show an anticipated additional comparison 

floorspace provision of some 91,600 square metres to 2013, excluding the 

Buchanan Galleries extension but including the St. Enoch extension. It is unlikely 

that the Buchanan Galleries development will have opened and reached normal 

trading conditions by 2012 so has not been built into our model, but we have 

assumed that all the other permissions will have been implemented by then. 

3.33 Following the same process as for Silverburn, in Table 17 we have made further 

adjustments to the market shares of centres within each area to allow for the likely



effect of the additional floorspace provision in Glasgow City Centre. This results 

in that element of the city centre’s turnover which is drawn from the Braehead 

catchment increasing from £1,046 million to £1,137 million, while Braehead’s 

turnover from catchment drops from £307 million to £279 million, reflecting the 

shift in market share from Braehead to the city centre. 

3.34 Braehead’s turnover is shown to have dropped by nearly £90 million because of 

the combined effects of the Silverburn development and new floorspace in the city 

centre. Similarly the Braehead Retail Park’s turnover is down by some £29 million 

compared with the 2008 projected estimate, because of the impact of expansion 

of Abbotsinch and Phoenix retail parks. However, apart from the impact on 

Braehead, the expansion of these retail parks is shown to have been absorbed into 

the retail system without any significant adverse effects, and the Silverburn 

development is also now a part of the system and taking around £260 million of 

comparison spending from the Braehead catchment. 

3.35 Table 18 shows the likely trade draw pattern in 2010, which can be read alongside 

Table 17's market share analysis to provide the full picture of likely shopping 

patterns, and also compared with Table 10 to show estimated changes in trade 

draw from 2008 to 2010 after all commitments have been taken into account. 

One notable change is the more localised trade draw of Braehead, indicating a 

shrinking catchment because of the effect of new developments elsewhere. 

Turnover Potential from Sainsbury’s Relocation 

3.36 Tables 19 to 21 show the estimated effect of the Sainsbury’s relocation, which was 

set out in our 2008 report in support of the Sainsbury’s planning application. Table 

19 shows the calculation we undertook to estimate the potential difference in 

turnover at Braehead when comparing the reoccupation of the B&Q Warehouse, 

subdivided into four units for bulky goods sales, with the Sainsbury’s relocation. 

In 2008 we did not know the likely occupation of the vacated Sainsbury’s store in 

the main centre, but now we know that this will be occupied by Primark, the 

clothing and footwear retailer, so we are able to more accurately estimate the 

likely comparison turnover of that unit. 

3.37 On the assumption that an electrical retailer, a carpet warehouse, a furniture 

retailer and car accessories operation could have occupied the old B&Q, we 

applied Retail Rankings estimates of the turnover potential for such retailers to the 

floorspace which could be created, and as a result we estimated that the total



potential comparison turnover could be of the order of £36 million in 2010, 

generated by the reoccupied B&Q and also by the comparison floorspace which 

would remain in the unrelocated Sainsbury’s store in the mall. 

3.38 We then considered the proportion of this turnover which would be competing 

directly with retailers in the High Streets of existing town centres - i.e. the amount 

of trade which would not be available to existing town centres if the B&Q was 

reoccupied. The 2003 household survey revealed that only 50% or so of spending 

in the Paisley catchment on electrical, carpets and furniture goods was made in 

retail parks, with the remainder made in town centres. There is no data available 

for car accessories stores so we assumed that 75% of such trade would be in retail 

parks. As regards the comparison trade in the old Sainsbury’s, this was 

unrestricted floorspace and was located close to the other comparison shops in 

the main shopping mall, so it was appropriate to assume that none of that trade 

would be available to town centres. Thus we were able to estimate that, of the 

total turnover potential generated by a reoccupied B&Q and by Sainsbury’s 

remaining in the mall, some £20 million of the total £36 million would be 

unavailable for town centre consumption by virtue of the existing permission at the 

retail park at Braehead. 

3.39 We then considered the turnover potential of the situation at Braehead with 

Sainsbury’s relocated, and we have updated that analysis in light of the knowledge 

that Primark are occupying the vacated Sainsbury store in the main centre. 

Table 19 shows that the total turnover potential of the reoccupied mall floorspace 

and the comparison element of the new Sainsbury’s could be £37 million, assuming 

healthy trading conditions. However some of the Sainsbury’s comparison 

floorspace trades in restricted goods and so competes with retail parks as well as 

town centres, while the unrestricted comparison floorspace - although it can be 

considered to be in competition with town centres - will also compete to a 

considerable extent with similar large superstores selling unrestricted comparison 

goods in out-of-centre locations. Consequently we assumed that 75% rather than 

100% of this unrestricted floorspace would be in direct competition with town 

centres. As regards the unrestricted floorspace in the former Sainsbury’s in the 

mall, occupied by Primark, all of this (100%) potentially competes with existing 

town centres. Thus the total potential turnover of competing floorspace is £32.3 

million. 

3.40 Comparing the two scenarios set out in Table 19, it can be seen that the net 

increase in competing comparison turnover compared with the turnover potential



of the B&Q reoccupied scenario is £12.5 million, and it is this turnover which can 

be regarded as potentially being diverted from other retail destinations. 

Estimated Trade Diversions Due to Sainsbury Relocation 

3.41 We then estimated how the additional £12.5 million trade at Braehead would be 

diverted from other shopping destinations, and this analysis is set out in Table 20. 

For each catchment we estimated how the comparison trade might be 

redistributed, having regard to the nature of the shopping facilities which would 

be likely to be in competition with the improved offer at Braehead, and the market 

share and trade draw patterns revealed in Tables 17 and 18. 

3.42 We assumed that 70% of the new trade at Braehead would be drawn from the 

Paisley / Renfrew catchment (Table 20, column 8) - which is considerably higher 

than the 52% which Braehead drew from the Paisley catchment when the 

household survey was undertaken (Table 10, column 9), reflecting the more 

localised catchment of the Sainsbury’s element of the additional turnover, and also 

reflecting the prediction in Table 18 that Braehead’s trade draw will tend to 

become more localised as the increased competition from other centres takes 

effect. We estimated that the remaining trade would be drawn from throughout 

the existing Braehead catchment, broadly reflecting the 2003 patterns, except for 

the draw from the Pollok area where the trade draw would be lower than in 2003 

because of the Silverburn effect. Some of the trade within the new comparison 

floorspace would be diverted from other existing stores within the Braehead 

centre, reflecting competition between existing and new traders. 

3.43 The total effect of the estimated trade diversions can be seen in the right-hand 

columns of Table 20, where the percentage impacts and changes in turnover per 

square metre are shown. All the percentage reductions are extremely low (less 

than 1%), which is not surprising given that the total trade diversion is only £12.5 

million. None of these trade diversions would cause any longer-term trading 

difficulty in the centres concerned. 

3.44 The turnover at Braehead is predicted to increase by 3% as a result of the 

Sainsbury’s relocation, although still £67 million below the level that it could have 

expected to achieve from the main catchment area in 2008 in the absence of the 

various competing new developments coming on stream. Braehead’s market 

share is projected to fall to 6.9% of the available spending in its catchment, 

compared with its 9% market share in 2003.



Effect of the Proposed Extensions to the Retail Park 

3.45 Having now analysed all the likely changes to the turnover, market share and trade 

draw of Braehead and other centres as a result of the implementation of 

commitments, relocation of Sainsbury’s, and increases in retail expenditure to 

2010, we can now consider the likely effect of the proposed extensions to the 

retail park, assuming also that the new mezzanine floor is installed in the existing 

Curry’s unit. 

3.46 As previously explained, we are assuming that the proposed extensions will have 

been built and occupied, and a normal level of trade established, by the year 2012. 

Consequently we need to roll forward the patterns of retail spending from 2010 

to 2012 before proceeding further. Table 21 shows the estimated patterns of 

spending in 2010 following the implementation of all commitments plus the 

Sainsbury’s relocation, and Table 22 shows the same spending patterns applied to 

2012 levels of expenditure. The total turnover derived from the catchment, of 

£4,506 million, is the same total as shown in the expenditure calculations in 

Table 3. 

Estimated Turnover of the New Floorspace 

3.47 Table 23 shows our estimate of the potential turnover of the new retail floorspace 

being proposed. We have assumed one of the units being occupied by a furniture 

retailer and the other by a higher-value operator such as an electrical goods 

retailer. We have then applied the 2009 Retail Rankings estimate of Curry’s 

turnover to the proposed mezzanine floor area. The total potential additional 

turnover is £26.2 million. 

3.48 Following the same methodology as in Table 20 for the Sainsbury’s relocation, we 

have then estimated the likely source of the £26.2 million in terms of trade draw 

from each part of the catchment, and the centres from which the trade is likely to 

be diverted. Based on the household survey evidence and our analysis of changes 

since then, showing the retail park drawing around 55% of its main catchment 

trade from the Paisley / Renfrew area, 20% from the Glasgow South area, 11% 

from North West Glasgow, and smaller amounts from the remaining sub-areas, 

we have assumed that the new floorspace will have similar trade draw 

characteristics. Accordingly Table 24 examines the likely trade diversions from 

each shopping destination, based on similar trade draws to those currently 

achieved at the retail park.



3.49 Some of the trade drawn to the new facilities at Braehead will have been 

previously directed to other retailers in the park, so some of the diversions will be 

within Braehead itself. The rest of the trade drawn to the new units and the 

additional Curry’s floorspace will be diverted primarily from other retail parks in 

Renfrewshire and beyond. Table 24 shows how we have estimated this 

redistribution is likely to occur - the trade obtained from within Renfrewshire 

being diverted almost entirely from the other retail parks in Renfrewshire, while 

trade drawn from beyond the Paisley / Renfrew area is likely to be diverted 

primarily from those facilities which are most directly in competition with the 

Braehead retail park. 

3.50 The anticipated outcome of the introduction of the additional floorspace is an 11% 

increase in the turnover within the retail park, although a slight (2%) reduction in 

the level of turnover per square metre, as is normally the case when the amount 

of floorspace in a centre is increased. Each of the three main competing retail 

parks in Renfrewshire experience a reduction of around 7% in turnover, although 

the largest actual reduction in monetary terms is at Abbotsinch, which is the 

largest and most popular of the three other retail parks. There are no other 

predicted trade diversions of any significance. 

3.51 The overall effect, therefore, is of a very self-contained redistribution of turnover 

within the Renfrewshire retail parks. There are no town centres likely to be 

affected by the proposals. 

Conclusions 

3.52 Our detailed analysis builds on the earlier analysis undertaken to examine the 

implications of relocating Sainsbury’s from the main centre to the retail park, but 

also takes account of the effects of the recession and the reduction in retail 

expenditure growth which had not yet emerged when the 2008 analysis was 

undertaken, and allows for a higher level of additional retail floorspace being 

provided in Glasgow city centre. 

3.53 The analysis shows that although the pace of retail growth has eased, and the 

expenditure projections are lower than they were in 2008 for the same future 

years, there is ample scope for redistribution of bulky goods trade to support the 

modest amount of additional retail floorspace being proposed for Braehead Retail 

Park, after taking account of the implementation of commitments and the recent 

relocation of Sainsbury’s into the retail park - which had the effect of reducing the



amount of bulky goods floorspace available at Braehead. There are no town 

centres likely to be affected by the proposal, and the estimated trade reductions 

in the other retail parks are all relatively modest at around 7% - with residual 

turnover levels in 2012 which are very similar to estimated 2010 levels (Table 24 

compared with Table 21). 

3.54 Consequently the current proposals do not raise any concerns so far as retail 

impact or expenditure availability is concerned, and the retail impact and 

catchment capacity tests required by the SPP, the Structure Plan and the Local 

Plan are all satisfied.



4 CONCLUSIONS 

4.1 The new SPP - which is the most recent statement of planning policy in Scotland, 

and more up to date than the Glasgow & The Clyde Valley Structure Plan and the 

Renfrewshire Local Plan, gives support to investment to maintain and improve 

commercial centres, where the centres are part of the network of centres in the 

development plan and where such investment will not undermine town centres. 

The Fourth Alteration to the Structure Plan confirmed Braehead as a commercial 

centre, and the analysis in the previous section of this report demonstrated that 

the proposed investment at Braehead Retail Park will not undermine any town 

centres. Accordingly there is national policy support for the current proposals. 

4.2 The proposals have been thoroughly assessed against the policies of the Structure 

Plan and shown to accord with its requirements. The relevant local plan policies 

R1, R2, R13 and R16 have also been examined, and it has been noted that the 

proposal complies with policies R1, R2 and R16, but does not conform with the 

floorspace restrictions of Policy R13. However it is considered that the departure 

from Policy R13 is not significant, because (1) the additional floorspace is far less 

than could be provided by way of mezzanine floors in the retail park, which in 

future will be under the full control of the council because of the effect of the 

proposed new legal agreement, and (2) in the light of national retail planning policy 

set out in the SPP, it is no longer appropriate to impose blanket presumptions 

against additional retail floorspace at the Braehead Retail Park, which is now 

designated as a Commercial Centre. 

4.3 A detailed retail impact analysis has been undertaken, which shows that the effect 

of the proposed additional retail floorspace will be to reduce the turnover at the 

existing Renfrewshire retail parks by around 7%, but that each park will still 

maintain a healthy turnover-to-floorspace ratio. There are no town centres likely 

to be affected by the proposals. 

4.4 The proposals will allow the retail park to respond to additional external 

competition from other retail destinations, restore some of the bulky goods retail 

floorspace which was lost to the park following the relocation of Sainsbury’s, and 

allow the park some flexibility to accommodate the future needs of its tenants, as 

well as providing new opportunities. It will also result in the visual enhancement 

of the park, particularly at the western end facing the main centre, improve links 

between the retail park, bus station and main centre, and allow improvements to



landscaping. The new extensions will be of a high standard of design, and will link 

in well with the existing buildings. 

4.5 Accordingly Renfrewshire Council is invited to give its full support to the proposals 

and to approve the planning applications and the Certificate of Lawful Use or 

Development.

PROPOSED EXTENSIONS AT ASSESSMENT OF PLANNING AND RETAIL ISSUES 


Appendix 

Retail Tables 1 - 24

Table 1 

Population Estimates - Braehead Main Catchment 

Bishopbriggs / Kirkintilloch 

Glasgow NW / Clydebank 

Dumbarton / Vale of Leven 

Glasgow Sth / Newtn Mrns 

Paisley / Renfrew 

E Kilbride / Rutherglen 

Greenock 

Argyll & Bute 

# from Technical Report 7/06 

* from Technical Report 7, July 2000 

10 - 20 

0 - 10 

10 - 20 

10 - 20 

0 - 10 

10 - 20 

10 - 20 

10 - 20 

+ estimated from GROS population projections 2010 

~ estimated pro-rata from 2006 and 2011 estimates 

Population 2011 # 

124143 

262277 

45442 

204442 

252683 

164475 

74994 

90939 

1219395 

Population 2006 * 

126885 

282299 

45153 

213526 

259391 

165284 

74314 

91390 

1258242 

Population 2008 ~ 

125788 

274290 

45269 

209892 

256708 

164960 

74586 

91210 

1242703 

Population 2010 ~ 

124691 

266281 

45384 

206259 

254025 

164637 

74858 

91029 

1227164 

Population 2012 + 

123723 

261694 

45341 

204272 

252521 

165105 

74575 

89467 

1216699 

15/4/10

Table 2 

Comparison Expenditure Estimates 

Expenditure Breakdown 

2005 estimates at 05 prices 

Clothing / footwear 

Electrical goods 

DIY / hardware 

Furniture / floorcoverings 

Other (bulky) 

Other (mainstream) 

Total 

2005 estimates from MapInfo 

0-10 

mins 

737 

451 

268 

306 

300 

687 

2749 

10-20 

mins 

772 

468 

275 

316 

310 

712 

2853 

Growth projections from Pitney Bowes Retail Expenditure Guide 2009/10 

Growth to 2008 

(actual growth) 

0-10 

847 

518 

308 

352 

345 

789 

3,159 

10-20 

887 

538 

316 

363 

356 

818 

3,278 

Project to 2010 

0-10 

907 

555 

330 

377 

369 

846 

3,384 

10-20 

950 

576 

338 

389 

382 

876 

3,512 


0-10 

939 

575 

341 

390 

382 

875 

3,502 

10-20 

983 

596 

350 

403 

395 

907 

3,634 


0-10 

972 

595 

353 

403 

396 

906 

3,624 

10-20 

1,018 

617 

363 

417 

409 

939 

3,762 

15/4/10

Table 3 

Comparison Expenditure Estimates 

by Area and Category 







Greenock 

Argyll & Bute 

Total 2008 







Greenock 

Argyll & Bute 

Total 2010 







Greenock 

Argyll & Bute 

Total 2010 

2008 

412.34 

866.36 

148.39 

662.95 

810.82 

540.75 

244.50 

298.99 

3985.09 

2010 

437.86 

900.97 

159.37 

697.88 

859.49 

578.12 

262.86 

319.65 

4216.20 

2012 

465.40 

948.51 

170.56 

768.39 

915.26 

621.06 

280.52 

336.54 

4506.25 

Clothing 

111.58 

232.27 

40.15 

177.74 

217.38 

146.32 

66.16 

80.90 

1072.50 

Clothing 

118.48 

241.55 

43.12 

187.10 

230.43 

156.44 

71.13 

86.49 

1134.74 

Clothing 

125.93 

254.29 

46.15 

207.92 

245.38 

168.06 

75.91 

91.07 

1214.71 

Elect 

67.64 

142.13 

24.34 

108.76 

133.02 

88.70 

40.11 

49.05 

653.76 

Elect 

71.82 

147.81 

26.14 

114.49 

141.01 

94.83 

43.12 

52.43 

691.67 

Elect 

76.34 

155.61 

27.98 

126.05 

150.16 

101.88 

46.02 

55.21 

739.24 

DIY 

39.75 

84.46 

14.30 

64.63 

79.05 

52.12 

23.57 

28.82 

386.70 

DIY 

42.20 

87.84 

15.36 

68.04 

83.79 

55.73 

25.34 

30.81 

409.10 

DIY 

44.86 

92.47 

16.44 

74.07 

89.23 

59.86 

27.04 

32.44 

436.41 

Furn 

45.67 

96.44 

16.44 

73.80 

90.26 

59.89 

27.08 

33.12 

442.68 

Furn 

48.50 

100.29 

17.65 

77.68 

95.67 

64.03 

29.12 

35.40 

468.35 

Furn 

51.55 

105.58 

18.89 

85.11 

101.88 

68.79 

31.07 

37.28 

500.14 

Other 

Bulky 

44.80 

94.55 

16.12 

72.35 

88.49 

58.76 

26.57 

32.49 

434.12 

Other 

Bulky 

47.58 

98.32 

17.32 

76.16 

93.80 

62.82 

28.56 

34.73 

459.28 

Other 

Bulky 

50.57 

103.51 

18.53 

83.49 

99.88 

67.48 

30.48 

36.57 

490.52 

Other 

Main 

102.90 

216.51 

37.03 

165.68 

202.63 

134.95 

61.02 

74.62 

995.34 

Other 

Main 

109.27 

225.16 

39.77 

174.41 

214.80 

144.28 

65.60 

79.77 

1053.06 

Other 

Main 

116.15 

237.04 

42.56 

191.76 

228.73 

154.99 

70.01 

83.99 

1125.24 

15/4/10 

Total 

412.34 

866.36 

148.39 

662.95 

810.82 

540.75 

244.50 

298.99 

3985.09 

Total 

437.86 

900.97 

159.37 

697.88 

859.49 

578.12 

262.86 

319.65 

4216.20 

Total 

465.40 

948.51 

170.56 

768.39 

915.26 

621.06 

280.52 

336.54 

4506.25

Table 4 

Shopping Patterns in Main Catchment 2008 

Clothing 

Destination 

Origin 

Glasgow City Centre 

Paisley 

Braehead 

Braehead Retail Park 

Renfrew 

Johnstone 

Phoenix Retail Park 

Abbotsinch Retail Park 

Blythswood Retail Park 

Other Retail Park 

Govan 

Clydebank 

East Kilbride 

Local Town Centre 

Other incl Mail Order 

Total 

Bishopbr / Kirkint 

% 

73.8% 

0.0% 

3.9% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

5.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

7.0% 

10.2% 

100.0% 

£m 

82.37 

0.00 

4.31 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

5.62 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

7.86 

11.42 

111.58 

Source: Glasgow & Clyde Valley Household Shopping Survey 2004 

Glas NW / Clydbk 

% 

62.8% 

0.0% 

11.5% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.7% 

0.0% 

12.3% 

0.0% 

5.1% 

7.5% 

100.0% 

£m 

145.92 

0.00 

26.62 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.32 

0.00 

0.00 

1.62 

0.00 

28.57 

0.00 

11.85 

17.37 

232.27 

Dumbarton / V of Lvn 

% 

29.3% 

0.0% 

15.9% 

0.0% 

0.4% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

2.0% 

0.0% 

32.5% 

0.0% 

14.2% 

5.7% 

100.0% 

£m 

11.75 

0.00 

6.37 

0.00 

0.16 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.82 

0.00 

13.06 

0.00 

5.71 

2.29 

40.15 

Glas Sth / N Mearns 

% 

57.4% 

1.5% 

15.7% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

0.2% 

1.5% 

0.0% 

4.0% 

11.5% 

8.0% 

100.0% 

£m 

102.11 

2.67 

27.88 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.13 

0.00 

0.13 

0.38 

2.67 

0.00 

7.13 

20.50 

14.13 

177.74 


% 

20.6% 

27.7% 

40.1% 

0.0% 

0.3% 

0.8% 

2.9% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.3% 

0.2% 

0.0% 

0.3% 

2.3% 

4.6% 

100.0% 

£m 

44.81 

60.11 

87.25 

0.00 

0.65 

1.72 

6.25 

0.00 

0.00 

0.65 

0.43 

0.00 

0.65 

4.96 

9.91 

217.38 

E Kilbride / Ruth'gln 

% 

32.7% 

0.1% 

1.4% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

4.0% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

51.9% 

0.8% 

8.8% 

100.0% 

£m 

47.89 

0.19 

2.09 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

5.89 

0.00 

0.19 

76.01 

1.14 

12.92 

146.32 

% 

19.5% 

1.0% 

13.2% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.3% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.3% 

0.3% 

1.0% 

0.0% 

58.7% 

5.7% 

100.0% 

Greenock 

£m 

12.89 

0.69 

8.76 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.17 

0.00 

0.00 

0.17 

0.17 

0.69 

0.00 

38.84 

3.78 

66.16 

Argyll & Bute 

% 

57.3% 

0.0% 

14.6% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

2.2% 

0.0% 

7.9% 

0.0% 

6.7% 

11.2% 

100.0% 

£m 

46.36 

0.00 

11.82 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

1.82 

0.00 

6.36 

0.00 

5.45 

9.09 

80.90 

15/4/10 

Total 

£m 

494.10 

63.66 

175.10 

0.00 

0.81 

1.72 

6.87 

0.00 

0.13 

16.96 

3.28 

48.87 

83.79 

96.31 

80.91 

1072.50

Table 5 


Electrical Goods 

Destination 

Origin 


Paisley 

Braehead 

Braehead Retail Park / IKEA 

Renfrew 

Johnstone 





Govan 

Clydebank 

East Kilbride 



Total 


% 

17.4% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.8% 

0.0% 

0.2% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

58.7% 

0.2% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

6.3% 

16.4% 

100.0% 

£m 

11.77 

0.00 

0.00 

0.52 

0.00 

0.13 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

39.70 

0.13 

0.00 

0.00 

4.27 

11.12 

67.64 



% 

19.1% 

0.1% 

1.2% 

0.8% 

0.2% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

0.3% 

0.0% 

15.8% 

0.2% 

16.8% 

0.1% 

30.6% 

14.7% 

100.0% 

£m 

27.09 

0.12 

1.73 

1.11 

0.25 

0.00 

0.12 

0.49 

0.00 

22.51 

0.25 

23.87 

0.12 

43.54 

20.91 

142.13 


% 

6.2% 

0.0% 

3.8% 

1.4% 

0.5% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.5% 

11.5% 

0.0% 

32.1% 

0.0% 

34.0% 

10.0% 

100.0% 

£m 

1.51 

0.00 

0.93 

0.35 

0.12 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.12 

2.80 

0.00 

7.80 

0.00 

8.27 

2.45 

24.34 


% 

21.3% 

1.1% 

5.3% 

3.8% 

0.1% 

0.1% 

0.1% 

0.6% 

0.8% 

35.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

1.5% 

12.0% 

18.2% 

100.0% 

£m 

23.18 

1.21 

5.75 

4.13 

0.10 

0.10 

0.10 

0.71 

0.91 

38.10 

0.00 

0.00 

1.61 

13.10 

19.76 

108.76 


% 

3.6% 

20.3% 

15.8% 

11.6% 

0.6% 

1.9% 

1.6% 

18.8% 

8.0% 

4.2% 

0.4% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

3.0% 

10.2% 

100.0% 

£m 

4.79 

26.96 

21.05 

15.47 

0.80 

2.55 

2.07 

25.04 

10.69 

5.58 

0.48 

0.00 

0.00 

3.99 

13.56 

133.02 


% 

9.9% 

0.2% 

0.0% 

1.0% 

0.2% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.2% 

0.3% 

53.7% 

0.0% 

0.2% 

20.7% 

2.0% 

11.8% 

100.0% 

£m 

8.74 

0.15 

0.00 

0.87 

0.15 

0.00 

0.00 

0.15 

0.29 

47.63 

0.00 

0.15 

18.35 

1.75 

10.49 

88.70 

% 

1.9% 

0.0% 

0.3% 

0.6% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.3% 

0.0% 

2.2% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

88.0% 

6.8% 

100.0% 

Greenock 

£m 

0.74 

0.00 

0.12 

0.25 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.12 

0.00 

0.87 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

35.28 

2.72 

40.11 

Argyll & Bute 

% 

9.0% 

0.0% 

3.8% 

1.3% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

34.6% 

0.0% 

17.9% 

0.0% 

9.0% 

24.4% 

100.0% 

£m 

4.40 

0.00 

1.89 

0.63 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

16.98 

0.00 

8.80 

0.00 

4.40 

11.95 

49.05 

15/4/10 

Total 

£m 

82.23 

28.43 

31.47 

23.33 

1.41 

2.78 

2.30 

26.51 

12.00 

174.17 

0.86 

40.63 

20.09 

114.60 

92.95 

653.76

Table 6 


DIY / Hardware 

Destination 

Origin 


Paisley 

Braehead 


Renfrew 

Johnstone 





Govan 

Clydebank 

East Kilbride 



Total 


% 

4.6% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

1.3% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.2% 

0.0% 

80.1% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

2.2% 

11.7% 

100.0% 

£m 

1.81 

0.00 

0.00 

0.51 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.07 

0.00 

31.84 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.87 

4.64 

39.75 



% 

4.6% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

1.5% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.2% 

0.0% 

73.0% 

0.0% 

5.6% 

0.0% 

8.9% 

6.0% 

100.0% 

£m 

3.92 

0.00 

0.07 

1.31 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.15 

0.00 

61.66 

0.00 

4.72 

0.00 

7.55 

5.08 

84.46 


% 

1.0% 

0.0% 

0.5% 

2.5% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

65.3% 

0.0% 

11.4% 

0.0% 

15.8% 

3.5% 

100.0% 

£m 

0.14 

0.00 

0.07 

0.35 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

9.35 

0.00 

1.63 

0.00 

2.27 

0.50 

14.30 


% 

6.7% 

0.7% 

1.0% 

8.7% 

0.2% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

1.1% 

0.2% 

71.5% 

0.8% 

0.0% 

0.7% 

5.1% 

3.4% 

100.0% 

£m 

4.35 

0.44 

0.63 

5.61 

0.13 

0.00 

0.00 

0.69 

0.13 

46.24 

0.50 

0.00 

0.44 

3.28 

2.20 

64.63 


% 

0.0% 

8.0% 

5.3% 

31.8% 

0.5% 

2.7% 

3.5% 

27.5% 

0.0% 

14.6% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

0.0% 

3.4% 

2.6% 

100.0% 

£m 

0.00 

6.29 

4.16 

25.16 

0.39 

2.13 

2.81 

21.77 

0.00 

11.51 

0.00 

0.10 

0.00 

2.71 

2.03 

79.05 


% 

4.2% 

0.0% 

0.2% 

0.2% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.2% 

76.2% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

8.7% 

1.1% 

9.3% 

100.0% 

£m 

2.18 

0.00 

0.09 

0.09 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.09 

39.73 

0.00 

0.00 

4.54 

0.57 

4.82 

52.12 

% 

1.2% 

1.2% 

1.2% 

7.4% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.8% 

7.0% 

0.0% 

10.2% 

0.0% 

0.4% 

0.0% 

69.9% 

0.8% 

100.0% 

Greenock 

£m 

0.28 

0.28 

0.28 

1.75 

0.00 

0.00 

0.18 

1.66 

0.00 

2.39 

0.00 

0.09 

0.00 

16.48 

0.18 

23.57 

Argyll & Bute 

% 

3.7% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

1.2% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

72.0% 

0.0% 

9.8% 

0.0% 

8.5% 

4.9% 

100.0% 

£m 

1.05 

0.00 

0.00 

0.35 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

20.74 

0.00 

2.81 

0.00 

2.46 

1.41 

28.82 

15/4/10 

Total 

£m 

13.73 

7.01 

5.30 

35.13 

0.51 

2.13 

2.99 

24.34 

0.22 

223.45 

0.50 

9.35 

4.98 

36.18 

20.87 

386.70

Table 7 


Furniture / Floorcoverings 

Destination 

Origin 


Paisley 

Braehead 


Renfrew 

Johnstone 





Govan 

Clydebank 

East Kilbride 



Total 


% 

23.2% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

7.1% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.5% 

0.0% 

44.0% 

0.0% 

0.8% 

0.0% 

6.3% 

18.0% 

100.0% 

£m 

10.61 

0.00 

0.00 

3.24 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.25 

0.00 

20.09 

0.00 

0.37 

0.00 

2.87 

8.24 

45.67 



% 

21.0% 

0.5% 

0.0% 

11.8% 

0.3% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.8% 

0.0% 

31.7% 

0.0% 

12.3% 

0.0% 

8.6% 

13.0% 

100.0% 

£m 

20.21 

0.51 

0.00 

11.38 

0.26 

0.00 

0.00 

0.77 

0.00 

30.57 

0.00 

11.89 

0.00 

8.31 

12.53 

96.44 


% 

11.3% 

1.3% 

0.0% 

8.7% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

2.7% 

0.0% 

11.3% 

0.7% 

24.7% 

0.0% 

30.0% 

9.3% 

100.0% 

£m 

1.86 

0.22 

0.00 

1.42 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.44 

0.00 

1.86 

0.11 

4.05 

0.00 

4.93 

1.53 

16.44 


% 

27.0% 

1.8% 

0.0% 

15.7% 

0.3% 

0.0% 

0.2% 

1.5% 

1.1% 

18.6% 

1.8% 

0.3% 

1.8% 

10.1% 

19.8% 

100.0% 

£m 

19.95 

1.34 

0.00 

11.59 

0.22 

0.00 

0.11 

1.11 

0.78 

13.71 

1.34 

0.22 

1.34 

7.47 

14.60 

73.80 


% 

5.6% 

21.5% 

0.0% 

26.9% 

0.9% 

1.4% 

4.0% 

7.2% 

4.3% 

14.6% 

0.0% 

0.7% 

0.0% 

6.3% 

6.3% 

100.0% 

£m 

5.06 

19.42 

0.00 

24.32 

0.82 

1.31 

3.59 

6.53 

3.92 

13.22 

0.00 

0.65 

0.00 

5.71 

5.71 

90.26 


% 

15.0% 

0.3% 

0.0% 

6.3% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.8% 

0.3% 

47.1% 

0.0% 

0.5% 

18.2% 

1.1% 

10.5% 

100.0% 

£m 

8.98 

0.16 

0.00 

3.78 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.47 

0.16 

28.21 

0.00 

0.32 

10.88 

0.63 

6.30 

59.89 

% 

14.4% 

2.6% 

0.0% 

6.7% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

3.1% 

0.0% 

4.6% 

0.0% 

1.0% 

0.0% 

64.1% 

3.6% 

100.0% 

Greenock 

£m 

3.89 

0.69 

0.00 

1.81 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.83 

0.00 

1.25 

0.00 

0.28 

0.00 

17.36 

0.97 

27.08 

Argyll & Bute 

% 

14.7% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

5.9% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

2.9% 

0.0% 

26.5% 

0.0% 

8.8% 

0.0% 

17.6% 

23.5% 

100.0% 

£m 

4.87 

0.00 

0.00 

1.95 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.97 

0.00 

8.77 

0.00 

2.92 

0.00 

5.84 

7.79 

33.12 

15/4/10 

Total 

£m 

75.43 

22.34 

0.00 

59.50 

1.29 

1.31 

3.70 

11.38 

4.85 

117.68 

1.45 

20.71 

12.21 

53.13 

57.69 

442.68

Table 8 


Other (Bulky) 

Destination 

Origin 


Paisley 

Braehead 


Renfrew 

Johnstone 





Govan 

Clydebank 

East Kilbride 




% 

15.8% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

2.8% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

0.0% 

0.2% 

0.0% 

59.9% 

0.1% 

0.2% 

0.0% 

5.2% 

15.7% 

100.0% 

£m 

7.08 

0.00 

0.00 

1.25 

0.00 

0.04 

0.00 

0.09 

0.00 

26.82 

0.04 

0.11 

0.00 

2.34 

7.03 

44.80 


% 

15.9% 

0.2% 

0.6% 

4.3% 

0.2% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.4% 

0.0% 

35.5% 

0.1% 

12.5% 

0.0% 

18.4% 

11.9% 

100.0% 

Source: Average of 2004 household survey results for main categories of bulky goods 

£m 

14.99 

0.19 

0.53 

4.04 

0.15 

0.00 

0.04 

0.41 

0.00 

33.58 

0.07 

11.85 

0.04 

17.39 

11.28 

94.55 


% 

6.4% 

0.4% 

1.8% 

3.9% 

0.2% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.8% 

0.2% 

25.4% 

0.2% 

24.5% 

0.0% 

28.1% 

8.1% 

100.0% 

£m 

1.03 

0.06 

0.29 

0.62 

0.03 

0.00 

0.00 

0.13 

0.03 

4.10 

0.03 

3.95 

0.00 

4.53 

1.31 

16.12 


% 

19.2% 

1.2% 

2.6% 

8.6% 

0.2% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

1.0% 

0.7% 

39.7% 

0.7% 

0.1% 

1.4% 

9.6% 

14.8% 

100.0% 

£m 

13.90 

0.87 

1.87 

6.24 

0.13 

0.03 

0.06 

0.74 

0.53 

28.70 

0.54 

0.07 

0.99 

6.98 

10.70 

72.35 


% 

3.3% 

17.4% 

8.3% 

21.5% 

0.7% 

2.0% 

2.8% 

17.6% 

4.8% 

10.0% 

0.2% 

0.2% 

0.0% 

4.1% 

7.0% 

100.0% 

£m 

2.88 

15.41 

7.38 

19.01 

0.59 

1.75 

2.48 

15.61 

4.27 

8.87 

0.14 

0.22 

0.00 

3.63 

6.23 

88.49 


% 

9.9% 

0.2% 

0.0% 

2.4% 

0.1% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.3% 

0.3% 

57.6% 

0.0% 

0.2% 

16.8% 

1.5% 

10.8% 

100.0% 

£m 

5.82 

0.09 

0.03 

1.39 

0.04 

0.00 

0.00 

0.18 

0.16 

33.83 

0.00 

0.13 

9.88 

0.86 

6.33 

58.76 

% 

5.4% 

1.1% 

0.4% 

4.2% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.2% 

2.9% 

0.0% 

5.0% 

0.0% 

0.4% 

0.0% 

76.2% 

4.3% 

100.0% 

Greenock 

£m 

1.44 

0.28 

0.12 

1.11 

0.00 

0.00 

0.05 

0.77 

0.00 

1.32 

0.00 

0.11 

0.00 

20.23 

1.14 

26.57 

Argyll & Bute 

% 

9.3% 

0.0% 

1.7% 

2.6% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.9% 

0.0% 

41.9% 

0.0% 

13.1% 

0.0% 

11.4% 

19.1% 

100.0% 

£m 

3.02 

0.00 

0.55 

0.86 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.29 

0.00 

13.61 

0.00 

4.26 

0.00 

3.72 

6.19 

32.49 

15/4/10 

Total 

£m 

50.17 

16.91 

10.76 

34.53 

0.94 

1.82 

2.63 

18.21 

5.00 

150.83 

0.82 

20.69 

10.91 

59.69 

50.20 

434.12

Table 9 


Other (Mainstream) 

Destination 

Origin 


Paisley 

Braehead 


Renfrew 

Johnstone 





Govan 

Clydebank 

East Kilbride 



Total 


% 

55.0% 

0.0% 

3.9% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

5.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

25.9% 

10.2% 

100.0% 

£m 

56.60 

0.00 

3.97 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

5.18 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

26.62 

10.53 

102.90 


% 

45.0% 

0.0% 

10.0% 

1.5% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.7% 

0.0% 

20.0% 

0.0% 

15.2% 

7.5% 

100.0% 

Source: Based on 2004 survey results for clothing category but weighted towards local centres 

£m 

97.43 

0.00 

21.65 

3.16 

0.00 

0.00 

0.30 

0.00 

0.00 

1.51 

0.00 

43.30 

0.00 

32.96 

16.19 

216.51 


% 

18.0% 

0.0% 

13.0% 

2.9% 

0.4% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

2.0% 

0.0% 

38.0% 

0.0% 

20.0% 

5.7% 

100.0% 

£m 

6.67 

0.00 

4.81 

1.06 

0.15 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.75 

0.00 

14.07 

0.00 

7.41 

2.11 

37.03 


% 

48.0% 

1.5% 

12.7% 

3.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

0.2% 

1.5% 

0.0% 

7.0% 

18.0% 

8.0% 

100.0% 

£m 

79.53 

2.49 

21.02 

4.97 

0.00 

0.00 

0.12 

0.00 

0.12 

0.36 

2.49 

0.00 

11.60 

29.81 

13.17 

165.68 


% 

14.0% 

32.5% 

33.0% 

7.1% 

0.3% 

0.8% 

2.9% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.3% 

0.2% 

0.0% 

0.3% 

4.0% 

4.6% 

100.0% 

£m 

28.37 

65.95 

66.87 

14.47 

0.60 

1.61 

5.82 

0.00 

0.00 

0.60 

0.40 

0.00 

0.60 

8.11 

9.24 

202.63 


% 

25.0% 

0.1% 

1.4% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

4.0% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

55.0% 

5.5% 

8.8% 

100.0% 

£m 

33.74 

0.18 

1.93 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

5.43 

0.00 

0.18 

74.22 

7.36 

11.92 

134.95 

% 

12.0% 

1.0% 

12.0% 

1.2% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.3% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.3% 

0.3% 

1.0% 

0.0% 

66.2% 

5.7% 

100.0% 

Greenock 

£m 

7.32 

0.63 

7.32 

0.76 

0.00 

0.00 

0.16 

0.00 

0.00 

0.16 

0.16 

0.63 

0.00 

40.38 

3.49 

61.02 

Argyll & Bute 

% 

35.0% 

0.0% 

13.5% 

1.1% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

2.2% 

0.0% 

10.0% 

0.0% 

26.9% 

11.2% 

100.0% 

£m 

26.12 

0.00 

10.07 

0.83 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

1.68 

0.00 

7.46 

0.00 

20.08 

8.38 

74.62 

15/4/10 

Total 

£m 

335.76 

69.25 

137.65 

25.24 

0.75 

1.61 

6.40 

0.00 

0.12 

15.67 

3.05 

65.65 

86.42 

172.74 

75.03 

995.34

Table 10 

Estimated Total Turnover and Trade Draw from Main Catchment 2008 

assuming no change in shopping patterns 2004 - 2008 

Destination 

Origin 

Glasgow City Centre * 

Paisley 

Braehead 


Renfrew 

Johnstone 





Govan 

Clydebank 

East Kilbride 



Total 

Source: Tables 4 to 9 combined 


% 

16.2% 

0.0% 

2.3% 

3.1% 

0.0% 

1.5% 

0.0% 

0.5% 

0.0% 

18.5% 

1.7% 

0.2% 

0.0% 

8.4% 

14.0% 

£m 

170.24 

0.00 

8.28 

5.52 

0.00 

0.17 

0.00 

0.42 

0.00 

129.25 

0.17 

0.48 

0.00 

44.84 

52.98 

412.34 


% 

29.4% 

0.4% 

14.0% 

11.8% 

11.4% 

0.0% 

3.2% 

2.3% 

0.0% 

21.7% 

3.2% 

60.3% 

0.1% 

22.8% 

22.1% 

£m 

309.56 

0.82 

50.60 

21.01 

0.65 

0.00 

0.79 

1.82 

0.00 

151.46 

0.32 

124.21 

0.16 

121.61 

83.36 

866.36 


% 

2.2% 

0.1% 

3.5% 

2.1% 

8.1% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.7% 

0.7% 

2.8% 

1.4% 

21.6% 

0.0% 

6.2% 

2.7% 

£m 

22.97 

0.28 

12.48 

3.81 

0.46 

0.00 

0.00 

0.57 

0.15 

19.67 

0.14 

44.56 

0.00 

33.12 

10.18 

148.39 

* Note: Glasgow City Centre turnover is total estimate from Glasgow City Plan Retail Capacity Study projected to 2008 - see Table 11 


% 

23.1% 

4.3% 

15.9% 

18.3% 

10.2% 

1.1% 

2.1% 

4.0% 

11.6% 

18.2% 

75.8% 

0.1% 

10.6% 

15.2% 

19.7% 

£m 

243.02 

9.03 

57.15 

32.55 

0.58 

0.13 

0.52 

3.25 

2.59 

127.49 

7.55 

0.29 

23.11 

81.14 

74.57 

662.95 


% 

8.2% 

93.5% 

51.8% 

55.4% 

67.1% 

97.4% 

92.5% 

85.7% 

84.6% 

5.8% 

14.6% 

0.5% 

0.6% 

5.5% 

12.4% 

£m 

85.91 

194.14 

186.72 

98.42 

3.83 

11.07 

23.02 

68.95 

18.88 

40.44 

1.45 

0.97 

1.25 

29.10 

46.68 

810.82 


% 

10.2% 

0.4% 

1.1% 

3.5% 

3.3% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

1.0% 

3.1% 

23.0% 

0.0% 

0.5% 

88.8% 

2.3% 

14.0% 

£m 

107.35 

0.76 

4.14 

6.14 

0.19 

0.00 

0.00 

0.80 

0.70 

160.73 

0.00 

0.96 

193.89 

12.31 

52.78 

540.75 

% 

2.5% 

1.2% 

4.6% 

3.2% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

2.3% 

4.2% 

0.0% 

0.9% 

3.3% 

0.9% 

0.0% 

31.6% 

3.3% 

Greenock 

£m 

26.55 

2.58 

16.60 

5.68 

0.00 

0.00 

0.57 

3.38 

0.00 

6.16 

0.33 

1.80 

0.00 

168.57 

12.28 

244.50 

Argyll & Bute 

% 

8.2% 

0.0% 

6.8% 

2.6% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

1.6% 

0.0% 

9.1% 

0.0% 

15.8% 

0.0% 

7.9% 

11.9% 

£m 

85.82 

0.00 

24.33 

4.61 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

1.26 

0.00 

63.58 

0.00 

32.62 

0.00 

41.96 

44.81 

298.99 

Total 

£m 

1051.41 

207.60 

360.29 

177.73 

5.72 

11.37 

24.90 

80.44 

22.32 

698.78 

9.96 

205.89 

218.41 

532.64 

377.64 

3985.09 

Floorspace 

Gross Sales 

sq m sq m 

15/4/10 

Turnover 

/ sq m Total 

£ £m 

422,433 253,460 £6,429 1629.55 

62,373 37,424 £5,547 207.60 

44,818 26,947 £15,376 414.33 

47,900 38,864 £4,573 177.73 

2,517 1,510 £3,787 5.72 

4,281 2,569 £4,425 11.37 

12,300 9,225 £2,699 24.90 

20,696 15,522 £5,182 80.44 

10,273 7,705 £2,897 22.32

Table 11 

Changes to Glasgow City Centre Turnover 

City centre turnover 2000 ('94 prices) 

City centre turnover 2000 ('05 prices) 

Turnover as % of available spend 2000 

Available Spend in City 2006 

Available Spend in City 2008 

City Centre turnover 2008 

New developments to 2013 

(GCC Retail Factsheet, July 2009) 

£1,262.53 m (from City Plan) 

£1,185.33 

80.74% 

m 

£1,830.71 m (from City Plan) 

£2,018.36 m (5% growth) 

£1,629.55 m 

91,621 sq m gross 

54,973 sq m sales

Table 12 

Estimated Total Turnover and Market Share from Catchment 2008 

assuming no change in shopping patterns 2004 - 2008 

Destination 

Origin 


Paisley 

Braehead 


Renfrew 

Johnstone 





Govan 

Clydebank 

East Kilbride 



Total 

Source: Tables 10 and 11 


% 

41.3% 

0.0% 

2.0% 

1.3% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

0.0% 

31.3% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

0.0% 

10.9% 

12.8% 

100.0% 

£m 

170.24 

0.00 

8.28 

5.52 

0.00 

0.17 

0.00 

0.42 

0.00 

129.25 

0.17 

0.48 

0.00 

44.84 

52.98 

412.34 


% 

35.7% 

0.1% 

5.8% 

2.4% 

0.1% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

0.2% 

0.0% 

17.5% 

0.0% 

14.3% 

0.0% 

14.0% 

9.6% 

100.0% 

£m 

309.56 

0.82 

50.60 

21.01 

0.65 

0.00 

0.79 

1.82 

0.00 

151.46 

0.32 

124.21 

0.16 

121.61 

83.36 

866.36 


% 

15.5% 

0.2% 

8.4% 

2.6% 

0.3% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.4% 

0.1% 

13.3% 

0.1% 

30.0% 

0.0% 

22.3% 

6.9% 

100.0% 

£m 

22.97 

0.28 

12.48 

3.81 

0.46 

0.00 

0.00 

0.57 

0.15 

19.67 

0.14 

44.56 

0.00 

33.12 

10.18 

148.39 


% 

36.7% 

1.4% 

8.6% 

4.9% 

0.1% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

0.5% 

0.4% 

19.2% 

1.1% 

0.0% 

3.5% 

12.2% 

11.2% 

100.0% 

£m 

243.02 

9.03 

57.15 

32.55 

0.58 

0.13 

0.52 

3.25 

2.59 

127.49 

7.55 

0.29 

23.11 

81.14 

74.57 

662.95 


% 

10.6% 

23.9% 

23.0% 

12.1% 

0.5% 

1.4% 

2.8% 

8.5% 

2.3% 

5.0% 

0.2% 

0.1% 

0.2% 

3.6% 

5.8% 

100.0% 

£m 

85.91 

194.14 

186.72 

98.42 

3.83 

11.07 

23.02 

68.95 

18.88 

40.44 

1.45 

0.97 

1.25 

29.10 

46.68 

810.82 


% 

19.9% 

0.1% 

0.8% 

1.1% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

0.1% 

29.7% 

0.0% 

0.2% 

35.9% 

2.3% 

9.8% 

100.0% 

£m 

107.35 

0.76 

4.14 

6.14 

0.19 

0.00 

0.00 

0.80 

0.70 

160.73 

0.00 

0.96 

193.89 

12.31 

52.78 

540.75 

% 

10.9% 

1.1% 

6.8% 

2.3% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.2% 

1.4% 

0.0% 

2.5% 

0.1% 

0.7% 

0.0% 

68.9% 

5.0% 

100.0% 

Greenock 

£m 

26.55 

2.58 

16.60 

5.68 

0.00 

0.00 

0.57 

3.38 

0.00 

6.16 

0.33 

1.80 

0.00 

168.57 

12.28 

244.50 

Argyll & Bute 

% 

28.7% 

0.0% 

8.1% 

1.5% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.4% 

0.0% 

21.3% 

0.0% 

10.9% 

0.0% 

14.0% 

15.0% 

100.0% 

£m 

85.82 

0.00 

24.33 

4.61 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

1.26 

0.00 

63.58 

0.00 

32.62 

0.00 

41.96 

44.81 

298.99 

Total 

£m 

1051.41 

207.60 

360.29 

177.73 

5.72 

11.37 

24.90 

80.44 

22.32 

698.78 

9.96 

205.89 

218.41 

532.64 

377.64 

3985.09 

Floorspace 

Gross Sales 

sq m sq m 

15/4/10 

Turnover 

/ sq m Total 

£ £m 

422,433 253,460 £6,429 1629.55 

62,373 37,424 £5,547 207.60 

44,818 26,947 £15,376 414.33 

47,900 38,864 £4,573 177.73 

2,517 1,510 £3,787 5.72 

4,281 2,569 £4,425 11.37 

12,300 9,225 £2,699 24.90 

20,696 15,522 £5,182 80.44 

10,273 7,705 £2,897 22.32

Table 13 


allowing for reduction in retail floorspace in Paisley town centre 

Destination 

Origin 


Paisley 

Braehead 


Renfrew 

Johnstone 





Govan 

Clydebank 

East Kilbride 



Total 


% 

41.3% 

0.0% 

2.0% 

1.3% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

0.0% 

31.3% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

0.0% 

10.9% 

12.8% 

100.0% 

£m 

170.24 

0.00 

8.28 

5.52 

0.00 

0.17 

0.00 

0.42 

0.00 

129.25 

0.17 

0.48 

0.00 

44.84 

52.98 

412.34 


% 

35.7% 

0.1% 

5.8% 

2.4% 

0.1% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

0.2% 

0.0% 

17.5% 

0.0% 

14.3% 

0.0% 

14.0% 

9.6% 

100.0% 

£m 

309.56 

0.82 

50.60 

21.01 

0.65 

0.00 

0.79 

1.82 

0.00 

151.46 

0.32 

124.21 

0.16 

121.61 

83.36 

866.36 


% 

15.5% 

0.2% 

8.4% 

2.6% 

0.3% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.4% 

0.1% 

13.3% 

0.1% 

30.0% 

0.0% 

22.3% 

6.9% 

100.0% 

£m 

22.97 

0.28 

12.48 

3.81 

0.46 

0.00 

0.00 

0.57 

0.15 

19.67 

0.14 

44.56 

0.00 

33.12 

10.18 

148.39 


% 

36.7% 

1.4% 

8.6% 

4.9% 

0.1% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

0.5% 

0.4% 

19.2% 

1.1% 

0.0% 

3.5% 

12.2% 

11.2% 

100.0% 

£m 

243.02 

9.03 

57.15 

32.55 

0.58 

0.13 

0.52 

3.25 

2.59 

127.49 

7.55 

0.29 

23.11 

81.14 

74.57 

662.95 


% 

12.2% 

18.8% 

25.5% 

12.6% 

0.5% 

1.4% 

3.0% 

8.9% 

2.3% 

5.0% 

0.2% 

0.1% 

0.2% 

3.6% 

5.8% 

100.0% 

£m 

98.92 

152.43 

207.14 

102.16 

3.83 

11.07 

24.32 

72.16 

18.88 

40.44 

1.45 

0.97 

1.25 

29.10 

46.68 

810.82 


% 

19.9% 

0.1% 

0.8% 

1.1% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

0.1% 

29.7% 

0.0% 

0.2% 

35.9% 

2.3% 

9.8% 

100.0% 

£m 

107.35 

0.76 

4.14 

6.14 

0.19 

0.00 

0.00 

0.80 

0.70 

160.73 

0.00 

0.96 

193.89 

12.31 

52.78 

540.75 

% 

10.9% 

1.1% 

6.8% 

2.3% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.2% 

1.4% 

0.0% 

2.5% 

0.1% 

0.7% 

0.0% 

68.9% 

5.0% 

100.0% 

Greenock 

£m 

26.55 

2.58 

16.60 

5.68 

0.00 

0.00 

0.57 

3.38 

0.00 

6.16 

0.33 

1.80 

0.00 

168.57 

12.28 

244.50 

Argyll & Bute 

% 

28.7% 

0.0% 

8.1% 

1.5% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.4% 

0.0% 

21.3% 

0.0% 

10.9% 

0.0% 

14.0% 

15.0% 

100.0% 

£m 

85.82 

0.00 

24.33 

4.61 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

1.26 

0.00 

63.58 

0.00 

32.62 

0.00 

41.96 

44.81 

298.99 

Total 

£m 

1064.43 

165.90 

380.72 

181.47 

5.72 

11.37 

26.20 

83.65 

22.32 

698.78 

9.96 

205.89 

218.41 

532.64 

377.64 

3985.09 

Floorspace 

Gross Sales 

sq m sq m 

15/4/10 

Turnover 

/ sq m Total 

£ £m 

422,433 253,460 £6,481 1642.56 

39,972 23,983 £6,917 165.90 

44,818 26,947 £16,134 434.76 

47,900 38,864 £4,669 181.47 

2,517 1,510 £3,787 5.72 

4,281 2,569 £4,425 11.37 

12,300 9,225 £2,840 26.20 

20,696 15,522 £5,389 83.65 

10,273 7,705 £2,897 22.32

Table 14 


allowing for other changes in retail floorspace in Paisley area 

Destination 

Origin 


Paisley 

Braehead 


Renfrew 

Johnstone 





Govan 

Clydebank 

East Kilbride 



Total 


% 

41.3% 

0.0% 

2.0% 

1.3% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

0.0% 

31.3% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

0.0% 

10.9% 

12.8% 

100.0% 

£m 

170.24 

0.00 

8.28 

5.52 

0.00 

0.17 

0.00 

0.42 

0.00 

129.25 

0.17 

0.48 

0.00 

44.84 

52.98 

412.34 


% 

35.7% 

0.1% 

5.8% 

2.1% 

0.1% 

0.0% 

0.5% 

0.3% 

0.0% 

17.3% 

0.0% 

14.3% 

0.0% 

14.0% 

9.6% 

100.0% 

£m 

309.56 

0.82 

50.60 

18.41 

0.65 

0.00 

4.33 

2.60 

0.00 

149.73 

0.32 

124.21 

0.16 

121.61 

83.36 

866.36 


% 

15.5% 

0.2% 

8.4% 

2.6% 

0.3% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.4% 

0.1% 

13.3% 

0.1% 

30.0% 

0.0% 

22.3% 

6.9% 

100.0% 

£m 

22.97 

0.28 

12.48 

3.81 

0.46 

0.00 

0.00 

0.57 

0.15 

19.67 

0.14 

44.56 

0.00 

33.12 

10.18 

148.39 


% 

36.7% 

1.4% 

8.6% 

4.5% 

0.1% 

0.0% 

0.5% 

0.7% 

0.4% 

19.0% 

1.1% 

0.0% 

3.5% 

12.2% 

11.2% 

100.0% 

£m 

243.02 

9.03 

57.15 

29.89 

0.58 

0.13 

3.31 

4.64 

2.59 

125.95 

7.55 

0.29 

23.11 

81.14 

74.57 

662.95 


% 

11.6% 

20.5% 

24.0% 

10.8% 

0.3% 

1.4% 

5.5% 

10.0% 

2.1% 

4.0% 

0.2% 

0.1% 

0.2% 

3.6% 

5.8% 

100.0% 

£m 

94.06 

166.22 

194.41 

87.92 

2.43 

11.07 

44.60 

81.08 

17.26 

32.33 

1.45 

0.97 

1.25 

29.10 

46.68 

810.82 


% 

19.9% 

0.1% 

0.8% 

1.1% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

0.1% 

29.7% 

0.0% 

0.2% 

35.9% 

2.3% 

9.8% 

100.0% 

£m 

107.35 

0.76 

4.14 

6.14 

0.19 

0.00 

0.00 

0.80 

0.70 

160.73 

0.00 

0.96 

193.89 

12.31 

52.78 

540.75 

% 

10.9% 

1.1% 

6.8% 

1.7% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

1.0% 

1.7% 

0.0% 

2.1% 

0.1% 

0.7% 

0.0% 

68.9% 

5.0% 

100.0% 

Greenock 

£m 

26.55 

2.58 

16.60 

4.05 

0.00 

0.00 

2.44 

4.16 

0.00 

5.13 

0.33 

1.80 

0.00 

168.57 

12.28 

244.50 

Argyll & Bute 

% 

28.7% 

0.0% 

8.1% 

1.5% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.4% 

0.0% 

21.3% 

0.0% 

10.9% 

0.0% 

14.0% 

15.0% 

100.0% 

£m 

85.82 

0.00 

24.33 

4.61 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

1.26 

0.00 

63.58 

0.00 

32.62 

0.00 

41.96 

44.81 

298.99 

Total 

£m 

1059.56 

179.69 

367.99 

160.35 

4.32 

11.37 

54.69 

95.52 

20.70 

686.38 

9.96 

205.89 

218.41 

532.64 

377.64 

3985.09 

Floorspace 

Gross Sales 

sq m sq m 

15/4/10 

Turnover 

/ sq m Total 

£ £m 

422,433 253,460 £6,461 1637.70 

46,775 27,902 £6,440 179.69 

45,235 27,141 £15,550 422.03 

47,900 38,864 £4,126 160.35 

954 572 £7,542 4.32 

4,281 2,569 £4,425 11.37 

24,400 18,300 £2,988 54.69 

25,691 19,268 £4,957 95.52 

10,273 7,705 £2,687 20.70

Table 15 


including allowance for Silverburn 

Destination 

Origin 


Paisley 

Braehead 


Renfrew 

Johnstone 





Govan 

Clydebank 

East Kilbride 

Silverburn # 



Total 


% 

41.3% 

0.0% 

2.0% 

1.3% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

0.0% 

31.3% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

10.9% 

12.8% 

100.0% 

£m 

170.24 

0.00 

8.28 

5.52 

0.00 

0.17 

0.00 

0.42 

0.00 

129.25 

0.17 

0.48 

0.00 

0.00 

44.84 

52.98 

412.34 


% 

35.2% 

0.1% 

4.1% 

2.0% 

0.1% 

0.0% 

0.5% 

0.3% 

0.0% 

17.3% 

0.0% 

14.3% 

0.0% 

2.4% 

14.0% 

9.6% 

100.0% 

£m 

304.96 

0.82 

35.52 

17.33 

0.65 

0.00 

4.33 

2.60 

0.00 

149.73 

0.32 

124.21 

0.16 

20.76 

121.61 

83.36 

866.36 


% 

15.5% 

0.2% 

8.4% 

2.6% 

0.3% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.4% 

0.1% 

13.3% 

0.1% 

30.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

22.3% 

6.9% 

100.0% 

£m 

22.97 

0.28 

12.48 

3.81 

0.46 

0.00 

0.00 

0.57 

0.15 

19.67 

0.14 

44.56 

0.00 

0.00 

33.12 

10.18 

148.39 


% 

30.0% 

0.4% 

3.0% 

4.2% 

0.1% 

0.0% 

0.5% 

0.7% 

0.4% 

17.0% 

1.1% 

0.0% 

1.5% 

21.0% 

11.0% 

9.0% 

100.0% 

Source: Estimated trade diversions to Silverburn by RDPC Note # : Silverburn assumed to draw trade from beyond main Braehead catchment 

£m 

198.89 

2.65 

19.89 

27.84 

0.58 

0.13 

3.31 

4.64 

2.59 

112.70 

7.55 

0.29 

9.94 

139.22 

73.06 

59.67 

662.95 


% 

10.4% 

20.1% 

21.3% 

9.7% 

0.3% 

1.4% 

5.3% 

9.8% 

2.1% 

3.0% 

0.2% 

0.1% 

0.2% 

7.0% 

3.6% 

5.6% 

100.0% 

£m 

84.33 

162.98 

172.42 

78.65 

2.43 

11.07 

42.97 

79.46 

17.26 

24.32 

1.45 

0.97 

1.25 

56.76 

29.10 

45.41 

810.82 


% 

18.0% 

0.1% 

0.5% 

1.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

0.1% 

27.0% 

0.0% 

0.2% 

31.0% 

10.1% 

2.3% 

9.5% 

100.0% 

£m 

97.33 

0.76 

2.70 

5.41 

0.19 

0.00 

0.00 

0.80 

0.70 

146.00 

0.00 

0.96 

167.63 

54.58 

12.31 

51.37 

540.75 

% 

10.7% 

1.1% 

5.7% 

1.5% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

1.0% 

1.7% 

0.0% 

2.0% 

0.1% 

0.7% 

0.0% 

1.5% 

68.9% 

5.0% 

100.0% 

Greenock 

£m 

26.16 

2.58 

13.94 

3.67 

0.00 

0.00 

2.44 

4.16 

0.00 

4.89 

0.33 

1.80 

0.00 

3.68 

168.57 

12.28 

244.50 

Argyll & Bute 

% 

28.7% 

0.0% 

8.1% 

1.5% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.4% 

0.0% 

21.3% 

0.0% 

10.9% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

14.0% 

15.0% 

100.0% 

£m 

85.82 

0.00 

24.33 

4.61 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

1.26 

0.00 

63.58 

0.00 

32.62 

0.00 

0.00 

41.96 

44.81 

298.99 

Total 

£m 

990.69 

170.06 

289.55 

146.83 

4.32 

11.37 

53.07 

93.90 

20.70 

650.16 

9.96 

205.89 

178.98 

275.00 

524.56 

360.04 

3985.09 

Change 

% 

-5.4% 

-5.4% 

-20.5% 

-8.4% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

-3.0% 

-1.7% 

0.0% 

-5.3% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

-18.0% 

+100% 

-1.5% 

-4.7% 

Floorspace 

Gross Sales 

sq m sq m 

15/4/10 

Turnover 

/ sq m Total 

£ £m 

422,433 253,460 £6,116 1550.04 

46,775 27,902 £6,095 170.06 

45,235 27,141 £12,361 335.49 

47,900 38,864 £3,778 146.83 

954 572 £7,542 4.32 

4,281 2,569 £4,425 11.37 

24,400 18,300 £2,900 53.07 

25,691 19,268 £4,873 93.90 

10,273 7,705 £2,687 20.70 

64,000 

38,400 

£9,310 

357.51

Table 16 


based on same market shares as 2008 

Destination 

Origin 


Paisley 

Braehead 


Renfrew 

Johnstone 





Govan 

Clydebank 

East Kilbride 

Silverburn 



Total 


% 

41.3% 

0.0% 

2.0% 

1.3% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

0.0% 

31.3% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

10.9% 

12.8% 

100.0% 

£m 

180.77 

0.00 

8.79 

5.86 

0.00 

0.18 

0.00 

0.44 

0.00 

137.25 

0.18 

0.51 

0.00 

0.00 

47.61 

56.26 

437.86 


% 

35.2% 

0.1% 

4.1% 

2.0% 

0.1% 

0.0% 

0.5% 

0.3% 

0.0% 

17.3% 

0.0% 

14.3% 

0.0% 

2.4% 

14.0% 

9.6% 

100.0% 

£m 

317.14 

0.85 

36.94 

18.02 

0.68 

0.00 

4.50 

2.70 

0.00 

155.71 

0.33 

129.17 

0.17 

21.59 

126.47 

86.69 

900.97 


% 

15.5% 

0.2% 

8.4% 

2.6% 

0.3% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.4% 

0.1% 

13.3% 

0.1% 

30.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

22.3% 

6.9% 

100.0% 

£m 

24.67 

0.30 

13.40 

4.09 

0.50 

0.00 

0.00 

0.61 

0.16 

21.13 

0.15 

47.86 

0.00 

0.00 

35.57 

10.93 

159.37 


% 

30.0% 

0.4% 

3.0% 

4.2% 

0.1% 

0.0% 

0.5% 

0.7% 

0.4% 

17.0% 

1.1% 

0.0% 

1.5% 

21.0% 

11.0% 

9.0% 

100.0% 

£m 

209.36 

2.79 

20.94 

29.31 

0.61 

0.14 

3.49 

4.89 

2.73 

118.64 

7.94 

0.30 

10.47 

146.55 

76.91 

62.81 

697.88 


% 

10.4% 

20.1% 

21.3% 

9.7% 

0.3% 

1.4% 

5.3% 

9.8% 

2.1% 

3.0% 

0.2% 

0.1% 

0.2% 

7.0% 

3.6% 

5.6% 

100.0% 

£m 

89.39 

172.76 

182.77 

83.37 

2.58 

11.73 

45.55 

84.23 

18.29 

25.78 

1.54 

1.03 

1.32 

60.16 

30.85 

48.13 

859.49 


% 

18.0% 

0.1% 

0.5% 

1.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

0.1% 

27.0% 

0.0% 

0.2% 

31.0% 

10.1% 

2.3% 

9.5% 

100.0% 

£m 

104.06 

0.81 

2.89 

5.78 

0.20 

0.00 

0.00 

0.85 

0.75 

156.09 

0.00 

1.03 

179.22 

58.35 

13.16 

54.92 

578.12 

% 

10.7% 

1.1% 

5.7% 

1.5% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

1.0% 

1.7% 

0.0% 

2.0% 

0.1% 

0.7% 

0.0% 

1.5% 

68.9% 

5.0% 

100.0% 

Greenock 

£m 

28.13 

2.77 

14.98 

3.94 

0.00 

0.00 

2.63 

4.47 

0.00 

5.26 

0.36 

1.93 

0.00 

3.96 

181.23 

13.21 

262.86 

Argyll & Bute 

% 

28.7% 

0.0% 

8.1% 

1.5% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.4% 

0.0% 

21.3% 

0.0% 

10.9% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

14.0% 

15.0% 

100.0% 

£m 

91.76 

0.00 

26.01 

4.93 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

1.35 

0.00 

67.97 

0.00 

34.87 

0.00 

0.00 

44.86 

47.91 

319.65 

Total 

£m 

1045.27 

180.29 

306.72 

155.31 

4.57 

12.05 

56.18 

99.54 

21.93 

687.84 

10.50 

216.71 

191.18 

290.62 

556.65 

380.84 

4216.20 

Change 

% 

6.0% 

6.0% 

5.9% 

5.8% 

5.8% 

6.0% 

5.9% 

6.0% 

6.0% 

5.8% 

5.5% 

5.3% 

6.8% 

6.0% 

6.1% 

5.8% 

5.8% 

Floorspace 

Gross Sales 

sq m sq m 

15/4/10 

Turnover 

/ sq m Total 

£ £m 

422,433 253,460 £6,482 1643.04 

46,775 27,902 £6,461 180.29 

45,235 27,141 £13,094 355.38 

47,900 38,864 £3,996 155.31 

954 572 £7,979 4.57 

4,281 2,569 £4,690 12.05 

24,400 18,300 £3,070 56.18 

25,691 19,268 £5,166 99.54 

10,273 7,705 £2,846 21.93 

64,000 

38,400 

£9,869 

378.96

Table 17 


allowing for implementation of City Centre commitments 

Origin 

Bishopbr / Kirkint Glas NW / Clydbk Dumbarton / V of Lvn 

Destination 


Paisley 

Braehead 


Renfrew 

Johnstone 





Govan 

Clydebank 

East Kilbride 

Silverburn 



Total 

% 

43.0% 

0.0% 

1.8% 

1.2% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

0.0% 

30.5% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

10.9% 

12.3% 

100.0% 

£m 

188.28 

0.00 

7.88 

5.25 

0.00 

0.18 

0.00 

0.44 

0.00 

133.66 

0.18 

0.51 

0.00 

0.00 

47.61 

53.86 

437.86 

% 

36.5% 

0.1% 

3.5% 

1.9% 

0.1% 

0.0% 

0.5% 

0.3% 

0.0% 

17.1% 

0.0% 

14.0% 

0.0% 

2.3% 

14.0% 

9.6% 

100.0% 

£m 

328.85 

0.85 

31.53 

17.12 

0.68 

0.00 

4.50 

2.70 

0.00 

154.07 

0.33 

126.14 

0.17 

20.72 

126.47 

86.84 

900.97 

% 

17.0% 

0.2% 

7.3% 

2.5% 

0.3% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.4% 

0.1% 

13.2% 

0.1% 

29.8% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

22.3% 

6.9% 

100.0% 

£m 

27.02 

0.30 

11.63 

3.96 

0.50 

0.00 

0.00 

0.61 

0.16 

21.04 

0.15 

47.49 

0.00 

0.00 

35.57 

10.93 

159.37 


% 

33.5% 

0.4% 

2.5% 

3.9% 

0.1% 

0.0% 

0.5% 

0.7% 

0.4% 

17.0% 

1.1% 

0.0% 

1.3% 

18.5% 

11.0% 

9.0% 

100.0% 

£m 

233.79 

2.79 

17.45 

27.22 

0.61 

0.14 

3.49 

4.89 

2.73 

118.64 

7.94 

0.30 

9.07 

129.11 

76.91 

62.81 

697.88 


% 

13.0% 

19.8% 

20.2% 

9.5% 

0.3% 

1.4% 

5.3% 

9.8% 

2.1% 

3.0% 

0.2% 

0.1% 

0.2% 

6.0% 

3.6% 

5.6% 

100.0% 

£m 

111.73 

170.18 

173.32 

81.65 

2.58 

11.73 

45.55 

84.23 

18.29 

25.78 

1.54 

1.03 

1.32 

51.57 

30.85 

48.13 

859.49 


% 

21.0% 

0.1% 

0.4% 

0.9% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

0.1% 

25.5% 

0.0% 

0.2% 

30.8% 

9.0% 

2.3% 

9.5% 

100.0% 

£m 

121.37 

0.81 

2.31 

5.20 

0.20 

0.00 

0.00 

0.85 

0.75 

147.42 

0.00 

1.03 

178.06 

52.03 

13.16 

54.92 

578.12 

% 

11.4% 

1.1% 

5.0% 

1.5% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

1.0% 

1.7% 

0.0% 

2.0% 

0.1% 

0.7% 

0.0% 

1.5% 

68.9% 

5.0% 

100.0% 

Greenock 

£m 

29.97 

2.77 

13.14 

3.94 

0.00 

0.00 

2.63 

4.47 

0.00 

5.26 

0.36 

1.93 

0.00 

3.96 

181.23 

13.21 

262.86 

Argyll & Bute 

% 

30.0% 

0.0% 

7.0% 

1.4% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.4% 

0.0% 

21.2% 

0.0% 

10.9% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

14.0% 

15.0% 

100.0% 

£m 

95.90 

0.00 

22.38 

4.48 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

1.35 

0.00 

67.92 

0.00 

34.87 

0.00 

0.00 

44.86 

47.91 

319.65 

Total 

£m 

1136.91 

177.71 

279.65 

148.82 

4.57 

12.05 

56.18 

99.54 

21.93 

673.79 

10.50 

213.30 

188.62 

257.39 

556.65 

378.60 

4216.20 

Change 

% 

14.8% 

-1.4% 

-9.0% 

-4.2% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

-2.0% 

0.0% 

-1.6% 

-1.3% 

-11.7% 

0.0% 

-0.6% 

Floorspace 

Gross Sales 

sq m sq m 

29/4/10 

Turnover 

/ sq m Total 

£ £m 

514,054 308,432 £6,113 1885.53 

46,775 27,902 £6,369 177.71 

45,235 27,141 £11,917 323.44 

47,900 38,864 £3,829 148.82 

954 572 £7,979 4.57 

4,281 2,569 £4,690 12.05 

24,400 18,300 £3,070 56.18 

25,691 19,268 £5,166 99.54 

10,273 7,705 £2,846 21.93 

64,000 

38,400 

£8,714 

334.61

Table 18 

Estimated Total Turnover and Trade Draw from Catchment 2010 

Destination 

Origin 


Paisley 

Braehead 


Renfrew 

Johnstone 





Govan 

Clydebank 

East Kilbride 

Silverburn 



Total 

Source: Table 17 


% 

16.6% 

0.0% 

2.8% 

3.5% 

0.0% 

1.5% 

0.0% 

0.4% 

0.0% 

19.8% 

1.7% 

0.2% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

8.6% 

14.2% 

£m 

188.28 

0.00 

7.88 

5.25 

0.00 

0.18 

0.00 

0.44 

0.00 

133.66 

0.18 

0.51 

0.00 

0.00 

47.61 

53.86 

437.86 


% 

28.9% 

0.5% 

11.3% 

11.5% 

14.8% 

0.0% 

8.0% 

2.7% 

0.0% 

22.9% 

3.2% 

59.1% 

0.1% 

8.1% 

22.7% 

22.9% 

£m 

328.85 

0.85 

31.53 

17.12 

0.68 

0.00 

4.50 

2.70 

0.00 

154.07 

0.33 

126.14 

0.17 

20.72 

126.47 

86.84 

900.97 


% 

2.4% 

0.2% 

4.2% 

2.7% 

10.9% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.6% 

0.7% 

3.1% 

1.4% 

22.3% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

6.4% 

2.9% 

£m 

27.02 

0.30 

11.63 

3.96 

0.50 

0.00 

0.00 

0.61 

0.16 

21.04 

0.15 

47.49 

0.00 

0.00 

35.57 

10.93 

159.37 


% 

20.6% 

1.6% 

6.2% 

18.3% 

13.4% 

1.1% 

6.2% 

4.9% 

12.4% 

17.6% 

75.7% 

0.1% 

4.8% 

50.2% 

13.8% 

16.6% 

£m 

233.79 

2.79 

17.45 

27.22 

0.61 

0.14 

3.49 

4.89 

2.73 

118.64 

7.94 

0.30 

9.07 

129.11 

76.91 

62.81 

697.88 


% 

9.8% 

95.8% 

62.0% 

54.9% 

56.5% 

97.4% 

81.1% 

84.6% 

83.4% 

3.8% 

14.6% 

0.5% 

0.7% 

20.0% 

5.5% 

12.7% 

£m 

111.73 

170.18 

173.32 

81.65 

2.58 

11.73 

45.55 

84.23 

18.29 

25.78 

1.54 

1.03 

1.32 

51.57 

30.85 

48.13 

859.49 


% 

10.7% 

0.5% 

0.8% 

3.5% 

4.4% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.9% 

3.4% 

21.9% 

0.0% 

0.5% 

94.4% 

20.2% 

2.4% 

14.5% 

£m 

121.37 

0.81 

2.31 

5.20 

0.20 

0.00 

0.00 

0.85 

0.75 

147.42 

0.00 

1.03 

178.06 

52.03 

13.16 

54.92 

578.12 

% 

2.6% 

1.6% 

4.7% 

2.6% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

4.7% 

4.5% 

0.0% 

0.8% 

3.4% 

0.9% 

0.0% 

1.5% 

32.6% 

3.5% 

Greenock 

£m 

29.97 

2.77 

13.14 

3.94 

0.00 

0.00 

2.63 

4.47 

0.00 

5.26 

0.36 

1.93 

0.00 

3.96 

181.23 

13.21 

262.86 

Argyll & Bute 

% 

8.4% 

0.0% 

8.0% 

3.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

1.4% 

0.0% 

10.1% 

0.0% 

16.3% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

8.1% 

12.7% 

£m 

95.90 

0.00 

22.38 

4.48 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

1.35 

0.00 

67.92 

0.00 

34.87 

0.00 

0.00 

44.86 

47.91 

319.65 

Total 

£m 

Floorspace 

Gross Sales 

sq m sq m 

29/4/10 

Turnover 

/ sq m Total 

£ £m 

100.0% 1136.91 514,054 308,432 £6,113 1885.53 

100.0% 177.71 46,775 27,902 £6,369 177.71 

100.0% 279.65 45,235 27,141 £11,917 323.44 

100.0% 148.82 47,900 38,864 £3,829 148.82 

100.0% 4.57 954 572 £7,979 4.57 

100.0% 12.05 4,281 2,569 £4,690 12.05 

100.0% 56.18 24,400 18,300 £3,070 56.18 

100.0% 99.54 25,691 19,268 £5,166 99.54 

100.0% 21.93 10,273 7,705 £2,846 21.93 

100.0% 673.79 

100.0% 10.50 

100.0% 213.30 

100.0% 188.62 

100.0% 257.39 64,000 38,400 £8,714 334.61 

100.0% 556.65 

100.0% 378.60 

4216.20

Table 19 

Potential Turnover - B&Q Subdivision and new Sainsbury's 

B&Q Divided: 

Electrical 

Carpets 

Auto Accessories 

Furniture 

Total 

Comparison unrestricted (Sainsbury's) 

Overall total 

compared with 

Floorspace 

Comparison unrestricted (mall) * 

Comparison unrestricted (Sainsbury's) 

Comparison restricted (Sainsbury's) 

Overall total 

Increase in Comparison Turnover 

Note: * assumes Primark national turnover / sq m 

Gross 

2,000 

3,000 

1,000 

3,662 

9,662 

1,134 

10,796 

Gross 

6,460 

3,170 

1,056 

10,686 

Sales 

1,500 

2,550 

750 

2,930 

7,730 

738 

8,468 

Sales 

3,876 

2,275 

758 

6,909 

Turnover 

£ / sq m £m 

£7,000 

£1,265 

£2,500 

£5,500 

£6,000 

10.50 

3.23 

1.88 

16.11 

31.71 

4.43 

36.14 

Turnover 

£ / sq m £m 

£5,300 

£6,000 

£4,000 

20.54 

13.65 

3.03 

37.22 

29/4/10 

Potential High St Trade 

% £m 

50% 

50% 

25% 

50% 

100% 

5.25 

1.61 

0.47 

8.06 

15.39 

4.43 

19.82 

Potential High St Trade 

% £m 

100% 

75% 

50% 

20.54 

10.24 

1.52 

32.30 

12.48

Table 20 

Potential Comparison Trade Diversions - 2010 

resulting from Sainsbury's relocation 

Destination 

Glasgow NW Dumbarton / VL 

% £m % £m 


Paisley 

Braehead 


Renfrew 

Johnstone 





Govan 

Clydebank 

East Kilbride 

Silverburn 



Total 

Source: Estimates by RDPC 

50.0% 

0.0% 

20.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

10.0% 

0.0% 

10.0% 

0.0% 

10.0% 

100.0% 

0.44 

0.00 

0.17 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.09 

0.00 

0.09 

0.00 

0.09 

0.87 

7.0% 

70.0% 

0.0% 

20.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

10.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

100.0% 

0.26 

0.00 

0.07 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.04 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.37 

3.0% 

Glasgow Sth / NM 

% £m 

50.0% 

0.0% 

5.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

35.0% 

0.0% 

10.0% 

100.0% 

0.50 

0.00 

0.05 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.35 

0.00 

0.10 

1.00 

8.0% 


% £m 

40.0% 

8.0% 

18.0% 

2.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

1.0% 

1.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

20.0% 

0.0% 

10.0% 

100.0% 

3.49 

0.70 

1.57 

0.17 

0.00 

0.00 

0.09 

0.09 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

1.75 

0.00 

0.87 

8.74 

70.0% 

Greenock 

% £m 

50.0% 

0.0% 

30.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

10.0% 

0.0% 

10.0% 

100.0% 

0.25 

0.00 

0.15 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.05 

0.00 

0.05 

0.50 

4.0% 

Argyll & Bute 

% £m 

50.0% 

0.0% 

30.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

10.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

10.0% 

100.0% 

0.19 

0.00 

0.11 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.04 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.04 

0.37 

3.0% 

Elsewhere 

% £m 

30.0% 

0.0% 

20.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

10.0% 

10.0% 

0.0% 

30.0% 

100.0% 

0.19 

0.00 

0.12 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.06 

0.06 

0.00 

0.19 

0.62 

5.0% 

Total 

£m 

5.32 

0.70 

2.26 

0.17 

0.00 

0.00 

0.09 

0.09 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.16 

0.06 

2.30 

0.00 

1.34 

12.48 

100.0% 

Turnover 

Previous New 

£m £m 

1885.53 1880.22 

177.71 177.01 

323.44 333.66 

148.82 148.64 

4.57 4.57 

12.05 12.05 

56.18 56.09 

99.54 99.45 

21.93 21.93 

673.79 673.79 

10.50 10.50 

213.30 213.14 

188.62 188.56 

334.61 332.31 

556.65 556.65 

378.60 377.26 

Change 

% 

-0.3% 

-0.4% 

3.2% 

-0.1% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

-0.2% 

-0.1% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

-0.1% 

-0.0% 

-0.7% 

0.0% 

-0.4% 

29/4/10 

Turnover / sq m 

Previous New 

£ £ 

£6,113 £6,096 

£6,369 £6,344 

£11,917 £12,294 

£3,829 £3,825 

£7,979 £7,979 

£4,690 £4,690 

£3,070 £3,065 

£5,166 £5,161 

£2,846 £2,846 

£8,714 

£8,654

Table 21 


after opening of Sainsbury's Braehead 

Origin 


Destination 


Paisley 

Braehead 


Renfrew 

Johnstone 





Govan 

Clydebank 

East Kilbride 

Silverburn 



Total 

Source: Tables 19 and 20 

% 

43.0% 

0.0% 

1.8% 

1.2% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

0.0% 

30.5% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

10.9% 

12.3% 

100.0% 

£m 

188.28 

0.00 

7.88 

5.25 

0.00 

0.18 

0.00 

0.44 

0.00 

133.66 

0.18 

0.51 

0.00 

0.00 

47.61 

53.86 

437.86 

% 

36.5% 

0.1% 

3.6% 

1.9% 

0.1% 

0.0% 

0.5% 

0.3% 

0.0% 

17.1% 

0.0% 

14.0% 

0.0% 

2.3% 

14.0% 

9.6% 

100.0% 

£m 

328.42 

0.85 

32.49 

16.86 

0.68 

0.00 

4.50 

2.70 

0.00 

154.07 

0.33 

126.05 

0.17 

20.63 

126.47 

86.75 

900.97 

% 

16.8% 

0.2% 

7.6% 

2.4% 

0.3% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.4% 

0.1% 

13.2% 

0.1% 

29.8% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

22.3% 

6.9% 

100.0% 

£m 

26.76 

0.30 

12.04 

3.85 

0.50 

0.00 

0.00 

0.61 

0.16 

21.04 

0.15 

47.45 

0.00 

0.00 

35.57 

10.93 

159.37 


% 

33.4% 

0.4% 

2.7% 

3.9% 

0.1% 

0.0% 

0.5% 

0.7% 

0.4% 

17.0% 

1.1% 

0.0% 

1.3% 

18.4% 

11.0% 

9.0% 

100.0% 

£m 

233.29 

2.79 

18.69 

26.93 

0.61 

0.14 

3.49 

4.89 

2.73 

118.64 

7.94 

0.30 

9.07 

128.76 

76.91 

62.71 

697.88 


% 

12.6% 

19.7% 

21.3% 

9.2% 

0.3% 

1.4% 

5.3% 

9.8% 

2.1% 

3.0% 

0.2% 

0.1% 

0.2% 

5.8% 

3.6% 

5.5% 

100.0% 

£m 

108.24 

169.48 

183.02 

78.94 

2.58 

11.73 

45.47 

84.14 

18.29 

25.78 

1.54 

1.03 

1.32 

49.82 

30.85 

47.26 

859.49 


% 

21.0% 

0.1% 

0.4% 

0.9% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

0.1% 

25.5% 

0.0% 

0.2% 

30.8% 

9.0% 

2.3% 

9.5% 

100.0% 

£m 

121.37 

0.81 

2.31 

5.20 

0.20 

0.00 

0.00 

0.85 

0.75 

147.42 

0.00 

1.03 

178.06 

52.03 

13.16 

54.92 

578.12 

% 

11.3% 

1.1% 

5.2% 

1.4% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

1.0% 

1.7% 

0.0% 

2.0% 

0.1% 

0.7% 

0.0% 

1.5% 

68.9% 

5.0% 

100.0% 

Greenock 

£m 

29.72 

2.77 

13.64 

3.80 

0.00 

0.00 

2.63 

4.47 

0.00 

5.26 

0.36 

1.93 

0.00 

3.91 

181.23 

13.16 

262.86 

Argyll & Bute 

% 

29.9% 

0.0% 

7.1% 

1.4% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.4% 

0.0% 

21.2% 

0.0% 

10.9% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

14.0% 

15.0% 

100.0% 

£m 

95.71 

0.00 

22.75 

4.37 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

1.35 

0.00 

67.92 

0.00 

34.83 

0.00 

0.00 

44.86 

47.87 

319.65 

Total 

£m 

1131.78 

177.01 

292.81 

145.21 

4.57 

12.05 

56.09 

99.45 

21.93 

673.79 

10.50 

213.14 

188.62 

255.16 

556.65 

377.45 

4216.20 

Floorspace 

Gross Sales 

sq m sq m 

29/4/10 

Turnover 

/ sq m Total 

£ £m 

514,054 308,432 £6,096 1880.22 

46,775 27,902 £6,344 177.01 

51,970 31,126 £10,720 333.66 

42,343 33,941 £4,747 161.12 

954 572 £7,979 4.57 

4,281 2,569 £4,690 12.05 

24,400 18,300 £3,065 56.09 

25,691 19,268 £5,161 99.45 

10,273 7,705 £2,846 21.93 

64,000 

38,400 

£8,654 

332.31

Table 22 


assuming same market shares as Table 21 

Origin 


Destination 


Paisley 

Braehead 


Renfrew 

Johnstone 





Govan 

Clydebank 

East Kilbride 

Silverburn 



Total 

% 

43.0% 

0.0% 

1.8% 

1.2% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

0.0% 

30.5% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

10.9% 

12.3% 

100.0% 

£m 

200.12 

0.00 

8.38 

5.58 

0.00 

0.19 

0.00 

0.47 

0.00 

142.07 

0.19 

0.55 

0.00 

0.00 

50.61 

57.24 

465.40 

% 

36.5% 

0.1% 

3.6% 

1.9% 

0.1% 

0.0% 

0.5% 

0.3% 

0.0% 

17.1% 

0.0% 

14.0% 

0.0% 

2.3% 

14.0% 

9.6% 

100.0% 

£m 

345.75 

0.90 

34.20 

17.75 

0.71 

0.00 

4.74 

2.85 

0.00 

162.20 

0.35 

132.70 

0.18 

21.72 

133.14 

91.33 

948.51 

% 

16.8% 

0.2% 

7.6% 

2.4% 

0.3% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.4% 

0.1% 

13.2% 

0.1% 

29.8% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

22.3% 

6.9% 

100.0% 

£m 

28.64 

0.33 

12.89 

4.12 

0.53 

0.00 

0.00 

0.65 

0.17 

22.51 

0.16 

50.79 

0.00 

0.00 

38.07 

11.70 

170.56 


% 

33.4% 

0.4% 

2.7% 

3.9% 

0.1% 

0.0% 

0.5% 

0.7% 

0.4% 

17.0% 

1.1% 

0.0% 

1.3% 

18.4% 

11.0% 

9.0% 

100.0% 

£m 

256.86 

3.07 

20.57 

29.65 

0.67 

0.15 

3.84 

5.38 

3.00 

130.63 

8.75 

0.33 

9.99 

141.77 

84.68 

69.05 

768.39 


% 

12.6% 

19.7% 

21.3% 

9.2% 

0.3% 

1.4% 

5.3% 

9.8% 

2.1% 

3.0% 

0.2% 

0.1% 

0.2% 

5.8% 

3.6% 

5.5% 

100.0% 

£m 

115.26 

180.48 

194.89 

84.07 

2.75 

12.49 

48.42 

89.60 

19.48 

27.46 

1.64 

1.09 

1.41 

53.06 

32.85 

50.32 

915.26 


% 

21.0% 

0.1% 

0.4% 

0.9% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.1% 

0.1% 

25.5% 

0.0% 

0.2% 

30.8% 

9.0% 

2.3% 

9.5% 

100.0% 

£m 

130.38 

0.87 

2.48 

5.59 

0.22 

0.00 

0.00 

0.92 

0.81 

158.37 

0.00 

1.10 

191.29 

55.90 

14.14 

59.00 

621.06 

% 

11.3% 

1.1% 

5.2% 

1.4% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

1.0% 

1.7% 

0.0% 

2.0% 

0.1% 

0.7% 

0.0% 

1.5% 

68.9% 

5.0% 

100.0% 

Greenock 

£m 

31.71 

2.96 

14.55 

4.05 

0.00 

0.00 

2.81 

4.77 

0.00 

5.61 

0.38 

2.06 

0.00 

4.17 

193.41 

14.04 

280.52 

Argyll & Bute 

% 

29.9% 

0.0% 

7.1% 

1.4% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.4% 

0.0% 

21.2% 

0.0% 

10.9% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

14.0% 

15.0% 

100.0% 

£m 

100.77 

0.00 

23.95 

4.60 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

1.42 

0.00 

71.51 

0.00 

36.67 

0.00 

0.00 

47.23 

50.40 

336.54 

Total 

£m 

1209.49 

188.60 

311.91 

155.41 

4.88 

12.83 

59.81 

106.05 

23.46 

720.36 

11.47 

225.30 

202.86 

276.62 

594.11 

403.08 

4506.25 

Floorspace 

Gross Sales 

sq m sq m 

29/4/10 

Turnover 

/ sq m Total 

£ £m 

514,054 308,432 £6,515 2009.33 

46,775 27,902 £6,759 188.60 

51,970 31,126 £11,419 355.44 

42,343 33,941 £5,081 172.45 

954 572 £8,529 4.88 

4,281 2,569 £4,996 12.83 

24,400 18,300 £3,268 59.81 

25,691 19,268 £5,504 106.05 

10,273 7,705 £3,045 23.46 

64,000 

38,400 

£9,382 

360.26

Table 23 

Estimated Turnover of Additional Retail Park Floorspace 

New Unit 1 

New Unit 2 

Currys mezzanine 

Total 

Floorspace (sq m) 

Gross Sales 

1,679 

1,679 

2,323 

5,681 

1,343 

1,343 

1,858 

4,545 

Turnover 

£ / sq m £m 

£3,500 

£7,000 

£6,500 

Table 24 

Potential Comparison Trade Diversions - 2010 

resulting from opening of new retail park floorspace at Braehead 

Destination 

Bishopbr / Kirkint Glasgow NW 

% £m % £m 


Paisley 

Braehead 


Renfrew 

Johnstone 





Govan 

Clydebank 

East Kilbride 

Silverburn 



Total 

Trade Draw (%) 

Source: Estimates by RDPC 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

35.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

25.0% 

0.0% 

40.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

100.0% 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.23 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.16 

0.00 

0.26 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.65 

2.5% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

20.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

40.0% 

20.0% 

0.0% 

20.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

100.0% 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.47 

0.00 

0.00 

0.94 

0.47 

0.00 

0.47 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

2.36 

9.0% 

4.70 

9.40 

12.08 

26.18 

Dumbarton / VL 

% £m 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

40.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

10.0% 

0.0% 

45.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

5.0% 

100.0% 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.31 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.08 

0.00 

0.35 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.04 

0.79 

3.0% 

Glasgow Sth / NM 

% £m 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

25.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

10.0% 

25.0% 

10.0% 

25.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

5.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

100.0% 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

1.18 

0.00 

0.00 

0.47 

1.18 

0.47 

1.18 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.24 

0.00 

0.00 

4.71 

18.0% 


% £m 

5.0% 

0.0% 

5.0% 

30.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

17.0% 

35.0% 

8.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

100.0% 

0.71 

0.00 

0.71 

4.24 

0.00 

0.00 

2.40 

4.95 

1.13 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

14.14 

54.0% 


% £m 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

50.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

10.0% 

0.0% 

40.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

100.0% 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.39 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.08 

0.00 

0.31 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.79 

3.0% 

Greenock 

% £m 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

25.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

20.0% 

35.0% 

0.0% 

20.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

100.0% 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.20 

0.00 

0.00 

0.16 

0.27 

0.00 

0.16 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.79 

3.0% 

Argyll & Bute 

% £m 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

30.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

35.0% 

0.0% 

30.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

5.0% 

100.0% 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.20 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.23 

0.00 

0.20 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.03 

0.65 

2.5% 

Elsewhere 

% £m 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

20.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

5.0% 

20.0% 

0.0% 

50.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

0.0% 

5.0% 

100.0% 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.26 

0.00 

0.00 

0.07 

0.26 

0.00 

0.65 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.07 

1.31 

5.0% 

Total 

£m 

0.71 

0.00 

0.71 

7.48 

0.00 

0.00 

4.04 

7.68 

1.60 

3.59 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.24 

0.00 

0.14 

26.18 

100.0% 

Turnover 

Previous New 

£m £m 

Change 

% 

29/4/10 

Turnover / sq m 

Previous New 

£ £ 

2009.33 2008.62 -0.0% £6,515 £6,512 

188.60 188.60 0.0% £6,759 £6,759 

355.44 354.73 -0.2% £11,419 £11,397 

172.45 191.15 10.8% £5,081 £4,967 

4.88 4.88 0.0% £8,529 £8,529 

12.83 12.83 0.0% £4,996 £4,996 

59.81 55.77 -6.8% £3,268 £3,047 

106.05 98.37 -7.2% £5,504 £5,105 

23.46 21.86 -6.8% £3,045 £2,837 

720.36 716.77 -0.5% 

11.47 11.47 0.0% 

225.30 225.30 0.0% 

202.86 202.86 0.0% 

276.62 276.38 -0.1% £9,382 £7,197 

594.11 594.11 0.0% 

403.08 402.94 -0.0%

Assessment of Planning and Retail Issues - Renfrewshire Council

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?