public nuisance and outraging public decency - Law Commission
public nuisance and outraging public decency - Law Commission
public nuisance and outraging public decency - Law Commission
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
(10) If without reasonable excuse a person does anything which he is<br />
prohibited from doing by an anti-social behaviour order, he [is guilty of<br />
an offence <strong>and</strong>] 117 liable—<br />
(a) on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not<br />
exceeding six months or to a fine not exceeding the statutory<br />
maximum, or to both; or<br />
(b) on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not<br />
exceeding five years or to a fine, or to both.<br />
It has been held that, where the ASBO procedure is available, it is inappropriate<br />
to seek an injunction instead. 118 This point would apply equally to injunctions to<br />
restrain criminal behaviour <strong>and</strong> injunctions to restrain a <strong>public</strong> <strong>nuisance</strong>.<br />
OTHER COUNTRIES<br />
2.61 In the Australian states, <strong>nuisance</strong> is defined at common law in the same way as<br />
in Engl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Wales, though some states have codified their criminal law. 119 In<br />
addition, some states (e.g. Queensl<strong>and</strong>) have a statutory “<strong>public</strong> <strong>nuisance</strong><br />
offence”, covering offensive language <strong>and</strong> behaviour in <strong>public</strong>. 120 As stated<br />
above, 121 in Engl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Wales many of these instances would be covered by<br />
specific statutory offences; but the current, as opposed to the older, 122 legislative<br />
practice in Engl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Wales is to make these offences entirely separate rather<br />
than creating statutory forms of <strong>public</strong> <strong>nuisance</strong>.<br />
2.62 New Zeal<strong>and</strong> defines “criminal <strong>nuisance</strong>” in s 145 of the Crimes Act 1961.<br />
Criminal <strong>nuisance</strong><br />
141.—(1) Every one commits criminal <strong>nuisance</strong> who does any<br />
unlawful act or omits to discharge any legal duty, such act or<br />
omission being one which he knew would endanger the lives, safety,<br />
or health of the <strong>public</strong>, or the life, safety, or health of any individual.<br />
(2) Every one who commits criminal <strong>nuisance</strong> is liable to<br />
imprisonment for a term not exceeding 1 year.<br />
2.63 This is narrower than the English offence, in that it requires danger to life, safety<br />
or health as a condition of criminal liability. Mere loss of amenity is not enough.<br />
The mental element is stringent: the statute specifies that the defendant “knew”<br />
117 Words substituted by Police Reform Act 2002 s 61(1) <strong>and</strong> (8).<br />
118 Birmingham City Council v Shaffi <strong>and</strong> Ellis [2008] EWCA Civ 1186, [2009] 3 All ER 127.<br />
119 David Barker, Essential Australian <strong>Law</strong> (2000) p 123. “A <strong>public</strong> <strong>nuisance</strong> is a crime,<br />
punishable at common law on indictment. It is also provided for in the Criminal Codes of<br />
Queensl<strong>and</strong>, Western Australia, Tasmania <strong>and</strong> the Northern Territory.”<br />
120 Summary Offences Act 2005 s 6 (discussed Walsh, “Offensive Language, Offensive<br />
Behaviour <strong>and</strong> Public Nuisance: Empirical <strong>and</strong> Theoretical Analyses”, [2005] UQLJ 5).<br />
This must be distinguished from <strong>public</strong> <strong>nuisance</strong> as such, as defined in s 230 of the<br />
Queensl<strong>and</strong> Criminal Code: Rimmington para 11.<br />
121 Para 2.59.<br />
122 For which see Spencer, as cited in para 2.10 above.<br />
25