public nuisance and outraging public decency - Law Commission
public nuisance and outraging public decency - Law Commission
public nuisance and outraging public decency - Law Commission
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
(iii) <strong>and</strong> it is, in the circumstances known to him, unreasonable to take<br />
the risk. 10<br />
PARTICULAR OFFENCES WITH SIMILAR FAULT ELEMENTS<br />
Some analogous offences<br />
5.9 Examples of crimes that exactly or closely follow these fault requirements –<br />
intention <strong>and</strong> recklessness (including words broadly equivalent to recklessness,<br />
such as ‘malice’ or ‘awareness’) - include criminal damage, some offences<br />
against the person, <strong>and</strong> some <strong>public</strong> order offences.<br />
5.10 Examples of offences with a requirement for proof of intention or recklessness<br />
are as follows.<br />
(1) Criminal damage. 11<br />
(2) Assault occasioning actual bodily harm. 12<br />
(3) Assault at common law.<br />
5.11 Examples of offences where intention or ‘awareness’ of risk is sufficient are as<br />
follows:<br />
(1) Riot. 13<br />
(2) Violent disorder. 14<br />
(3) Affray. 15<br />
(4) Threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour. 16<br />
5.12 Examples of offences where ‘malice’ (meaning intention or recklessness) is<br />
sufficient, are as follows:<br />
(1) Malicious infliction of grievous bodily harm. 17<br />
(2) Maliciously administering a destructive or noxious thing. 18<br />
10 This definition was adopted by Lord Bingham in G [2003] UKHL 50, [2004] 1 AC 1034.<br />
11 Criminal Damage Act 1971 s 1(1). See G, above.<br />
12 Offences Against the Person Act 1861 s 47.<br />
13 Public Order Act s 1. In relation to riot, Smith <strong>and</strong> Hogan, para 32.1.3.5 (p 1066), says: “It<br />
must be proved that a person charged with riot shared that common purpose <strong>and</strong> that he<br />
(but not necessarily the other 11 or more) intended to use violence or was aware that his<br />
conduct might be violent, <strong>and</strong> it is important that this is made clear to the jury.”<br />
14 POA 1986 s 2.<br />
15 POA 1986 s 3.<br />
16 POA 1986 s 4.<br />
17 OAPA 1861 s 20.<br />
18 OAPA 1861 s 23.<br />
59