Iran Sanctions - Foreign Press Centers
Iran Sanctions - Foreign Press Centers
Iran Sanctions - Foreign Press Centers
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Non-Application to Crude Oil or Natural Gas Purchases from <strong>Iran</strong> or to<br />
Official Credit Guarantee Agencies<br />
<strong>Iran</strong> <strong>Sanctions</strong><br />
Simple purchases of oil or natural gas from <strong>Iran</strong> are generally considered not to constitute<br />
violations of ISA, because ISA sanctions investment in <strong>Iran</strong>’s energy sector and sales to <strong>Iran</strong> of<br />
gasoline or gasoline-related services or equipment. Some of the deals listed in the chart later in<br />
this report involve combinations of investment and purchase. However, as discussed later, several<br />
countries are considering banning purchases of crude oil or natural gas as the optimal means of<br />
pressuring <strong>Iran</strong>’s economy.<br />
ISA does not sanction sales to <strong>Iran</strong> of equipment that <strong>Iran</strong> could use to explore or extract its own<br />
oil or gas resources, unless such sales are structured to provide ongoing profits or royalties (and<br />
therefore meet the definition of investments as provided in ISA). 7 For example, selling <strong>Iran</strong> an oil<br />
or gas drill rig or motors or other gear that <strong>Iran</strong> will use to drill for oil or gas would not appear to<br />
be sanctionable under ISA, unless the sale is structured to provide the seller ongoing profits or<br />
royalties. However, this exception was voided by Executive Order 13590 (November 21, 2011),<br />
which does provide for sanctions against sales of such equipment and services.<br />
Official credit guarantee agencies are not considered sanctionable entities under ISA. In the 110 th<br />
Congress, several bills—including S. 970, S. 3227, S. 3445, H.R. 957 (passed the House on July<br />
31, 2007), and H.R. 7112 (which passed the House on September 26, 2008)—would have<br />
expanded the definition of sanctionable entities to official credit guarantee agencies, such as<br />
France’s COFACE and Germany’s Hermes, and to financial institutions and insurers generally.<br />
Some versions of CISADA would have made these entities sanctionable but these provisions<br />
were not included in the final law, probably out of concern for alienating U.S. allies in Europe.<br />
Table 1. Top Energy Buyers From <strong>Iran</strong> (2011)<br />
(amounts in barrels per day, bpd)<br />
European Union (particularly<br />
Italy, Spain, and Greece)<br />
600,000<br />
China 550,000<br />
Japan 327,000<br />
India 310,000<br />
South Korea 228,000<br />
Turkey 196,000<br />
South Africa 80,000<br />
Singapore 50,000<br />
Total 2.34 mbd<br />
(nearly all of <strong>Iran</strong>’s oil<br />
exports)<br />
Source: International Energy Agency, CRS. March 2012<br />
7<br />
Prior to CISADA, the definition of investment in ISA specifically exempted sales of equipment or services under that<br />
definition. CISADA omitted that exclusion.<br />
Congressional Research Service 8