16.08.2013 Views

Iran Sanctions - Foreign Press Centers

Iran Sanctions - Foreign Press Centers

Iran Sanctions - Foreign Press Centers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Non-Application to Crude Oil or Natural Gas Purchases from <strong>Iran</strong> or to<br />

Official Credit Guarantee Agencies<br />

<strong>Iran</strong> <strong>Sanctions</strong><br />

Simple purchases of oil or natural gas from <strong>Iran</strong> are generally considered not to constitute<br />

violations of ISA, because ISA sanctions investment in <strong>Iran</strong>’s energy sector and sales to <strong>Iran</strong> of<br />

gasoline or gasoline-related services or equipment. Some of the deals listed in the chart later in<br />

this report involve combinations of investment and purchase. However, as discussed later, several<br />

countries are considering banning purchases of crude oil or natural gas as the optimal means of<br />

pressuring <strong>Iran</strong>’s economy.<br />

ISA does not sanction sales to <strong>Iran</strong> of equipment that <strong>Iran</strong> could use to explore or extract its own<br />

oil or gas resources, unless such sales are structured to provide ongoing profits or royalties (and<br />

therefore meet the definition of investments as provided in ISA). 7 For example, selling <strong>Iran</strong> an oil<br />

or gas drill rig or motors or other gear that <strong>Iran</strong> will use to drill for oil or gas would not appear to<br />

be sanctionable under ISA, unless the sale is structured to provide the seller ongoing profits or<br />

royalties. However, this exception was voided by Executive Order 13590 (November 21, 2011),<br />

which does provide for sanctions against sales of such equipment and services.<br />

Official credit guarantee agencies are not considered sanctionable entities under ISA. In the 110 th<br />

Congress, several bills—including S. 970, S. 3227, S. 3445, H.R. 957 (passed the House on July<br />

31, 2007), and H.R. 7112 (which passed the House on September 26, 2008)—would have<br />

expanded the definition of sanctionable entities to official credit guarantee agencies, such as<br />

France’s COFACE and Germany’s Hermes, and to financial institutions and insurers generally.<br />

Some versions of CISADA would have made these entities sanctionable but these provisions<br />

were not included in the final law, probably out of concern for alienating U.S. allies in Europe.<br />

Table 1. Top Energy Buyers From <strong>Iran</strong> (2011)<br />

(amounts in barrels per day, bpd)<br />

European Union (particularly<br />

Italy, Spain, and Greece)<br />

600,000<br />

China 550,000<br />

Japan 327,000<br />

India 310,000<br />

South Korea 228,000<br />

Turkey 196,000<br />

South Africa 80,000<br />

Singapore 50,000<br />

Total 2.34 mbd<br />

(nearly all of <strong>Iran</strong>’s oil<br />

exports)<br />

Source: International Energy Agency, CRS. March 2012<br />

7<br />

Prior to CISADA, the definition of investment in ISA specifically exempted sales of equipment or services under that<br />

definition. CISADA omitted that exclusion.<br />

Congressional Research Service 8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!