16.08.2013 Views

Iran Sanctions - Foreign Press Centers

Iran Sanctions - Foreign Press Centers

Iran Sanctions - Foreign Press Centers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Iran</strong> <strong>Sanctions</strong><br />

2105 (“The <strong>Iran</strong>, North Korea, and Syria Nonproliferation Reform and Modernization Act.”) The<br />

latter bill is highly similar to S. 1048, which is discussed below. Both House bills were passed by<br />

the House on December 14, 2011. H.R. 2105 passed 418-2, and H.R. 1905 passed 410-11. On<br />

February 2, 2012, the Senate Banking Committee ordered to be reported S. 2101, the <strong>Iran</strong><br />

<strong>Sanctions</strong>, Accountability, and Human Rights Act, that combines elements of these earlier bills.<br />

H.R. 1905 (<strong>Iran</strong> Threat Reduction Act of 2011)<br />

As passed, H.R. 1905, contains language restating provisions of ISA and would:<br />

• Add two sanctions to the available ISA menu: a ban on visas for the principal<br />

officers or controlling shareholders of sanctioned firms (and their subsidiaries,<br />

parents, and affiliates); and application of any other ISA sanction to the principal<br />

officers of a sanctioned firm.<br />

• Require the President to impose at least six out of the expanded ISA menu of 11<br />

available sanctions on any sanctioned firm.<br />

• Make subject to ISA sanctions (majority of the menu) any firm that helps <strong>Iran</strong><br />

issue sovereign debt.<br />

• Subject U.S. persons to penalty if they conduct any business with the IRGC or its<br />

affiliated entities, or with any foreign firm that conducts such banned transactions<br />

with the IRGC or its affiliates.<br />

• Ban commerce between <strong>Iran</strong> and subsidiaries of U.S. firms, in cases where the<br />

subsidiary is controlled or more than 50% owned by the parent firm.<br />

• Ban previously permissible licensing of the sale to <strong>Iran</strong> of U.S. equipment to<br />

provide for the safe operation of <strong>Iran</strong>’s civilian aircraft fleet.<br />

• State that it is U.S. policy to support those in <strong>Iran</strong> seeking democracy, and require<br />

an Administration submission to Congress of a comprehensive strategy to help<br />

the <strong>Iran</strong>ian people circumvent regime censorship and monitoring of their use of<br />

the Internet or other media.<br />

• Require an Administration report listing all persons who are members of named<br />

<strong>Iran</strong>ian government institutions, including high ranking IRGC officers—and ban<br />

visas for the named individuals.<br />

• Ban contact between any U.S. official and any <strong>Iran</strong>ian official who poses a threat<br />

to the United States or is affiliated with terrorist organizations.<br />

• Contain elements similar to H.R. 740 on Securities and Exchange Commission<br />

(SEC) disclosures, discussed further below.<br />

• Sanction <strong>Iran</strong>’s Central Bank if the President determines that it helped <strong>Iran</strong><br />

acquire WMD or facilitated transactions for the Revolutionary Guard or for<br />

entities sanctioned by the United States. (This sanction may have been mooted by<br />

enactment of P.L. 112-81, discussed further below.)<br />

• Set as U.S. policy to press Iraq not to close Camp Ashraf, an encampment in Iraq<br />

which houses about 3,300 <strong>Iran</strong>ian oppositionists, unless the residents can be<br />

resettled. The Camp Ashraf issue is discussed in detail in CRS Report RL32048,<br />

<strong>Iran</strong>: U.S. Concerns and Policy Responses, by Kenneth Katzman.<br />

Congressional Research Service 56

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!