Iran Sanctions - Foreign Press Centers
Iran Sanctions - Foreign Press Centers
Iran Sanctions - Foreign Press Centers
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Iran</strong> <strong>Sanctions</strong><br />
signed in September 1997, for Total SA of France and its partners, Gazprom of Russia and<br />
Petronas of Malaysia, to develop phases 2 and 3 of the 25+ phase South Pars gas field. The EU,<br />
for its part, pledged to increase cooperation with the United States on nonproliferation and<br />
counterterrorism. Then-Secretary of State Albright, in the May 18, 1998, waiver announcement,<br />
indicated that similar future such projects by EU firms in <strong>Iran</strong> would not be sanctioned, provided<br />
overall EU cooperation against <strong>Iran</strong>ian terrorism and proliferation continued. 11 (The EU sanctions<br />
against <strong>Iran</strong>, announced July 27, 2010, might render this understanding moot because the EU<br />
sanctions ban EU investment in and supplies of equipment and services to <strong>Iran</strong>’s energy sector.)<br />
Despite investments made in <strong>Iran</strong>’s energy sector, as shown in Table 4, the Administration made<br />
no violations determinations from 1998 until September 2010.<br />
ISA <strong>Sanctions</strong> Determinations: September 2010 to the Present 12<br />
Prior to the passage of CISADA, several Members of Congress questioned why no penalties had<br />
been imposed for violations of ISA. State Department reports to Congress on ISA, required every<br />
six months, have routinely stated that U.S. diplomats raise U.S. policy concerns about <strong>Iran</strong> with<br />
investing companies and their parent countries. However, these reports have not specifically<br />
stated which foreign companies, if any, were being investigated for ISA violations. No<br />
publication of such deals has been placed in the Federal Register, as required by Section 5e of<br />
ISA. In an effort to address the congressional criticism, Under Secretary of State for Political<br />
Affairs William Burns testified on July 9, 2008 (House <strong>Foreign</strong> Affairs Committee), that the<br />
Statoil project (listed in Table 4) was under review for ISA sanctions. Statoil is incorporated in<br />
Norway, which is not an EU member, and it would therefore not fall under the 1998 U.S.-EU<br />
agreement discussed above.<br />
Possibly in response to the pending CISADA legislation, and to an October 2009 letter signed by<br />
50 Members of Congress referencing Table 4, Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern<br />
Affairs Jeffrey Feltman testified before the House <strong>Foreign</strong> Affairs Committee on October 28,<br />
2009, that the Obama Administration would review investments in <strong>Iran</strong> for violations of ISA.<br />
Feltman testified that the preliminary review would be completed within 45 days (by December<br />
11, 2009) to determine which projects, if any, require further investigation. He testified that some<br />
announced projects were for political purposes and did not result in actual investment.<br />
On February 25, 2010, Secretary of State Clinton testified before the House <strong>Foreign</strong> Affairs<br />
Committee that the State Department’s preliminary review was completed in early February and<br />
that some of the cases reviewed “deserve[] more consideration” and were undergoing additional<br />
scrutiny. The preliminary review, according to the testimony, was conducted, in part, through<br />
State Department officials’ contacts with their counterpart officials abroad and corporation<br />
officials. The additional investigations of problematic investments would involve the intelligence<br />
community, according to Secretary Clinton. State Department officials told CRS in November<br />
2009 that they intended to complete the additional investigation and determine violations within<br />
180 days of the completion of the preliminary review, or by early August 2010. (The 180-day<br />
(...continued)<br />
over the life of a project, which might in some cases be several decades.<br />
11<br />
Text of announcement of waiver decision by then Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, containing expectation of<br />
similar waivers in the future. http://www.parstimes.com/law/albright_southpars.html.<br />
12<br />
Much of this section is derived from a meeting between the CRS author and officials of the State Department’s<br />
Economics Bureau, which is tasked with the referenced review of investment projects. November 24, 2009.<br />
Congressional Research Service 12