Iran Sanctions - Foreign Press Centers
Iran Sanctions - Foreign Press Centers
Iran Sanctions - Foreign Press Centers
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
March 29, 2011, <strong>Sanctions</strong> Determination Against Belarusneft<br />
<strong>Iran</strong> <strong>Sanctions</strong><br />
As shown in Table 4, several additional foreign investment agreements have been agreed with<br />
<strong>Iran</strong> not covered in the September 2010 determination. Some of these firms remained under<br />
Administration scrutiny, and the Administration stated that determinations will be made within<br />
180 days (by April 1, 2011).<br />
• On March 29, 2011, with that deadline approaching, the State Department<br />
announced that one additional firm would be sanctioned under ISA—Belarusneft,<br />
a subsidiary of the Belarus government owned Belneftekhim—for a $500 million<br />
contract with Naftiran (the company sanctioned in September 2010) to develop<br />
the Jofeir oil field discussed in Table 4. The three sanctions imposed were: denial<br />
of Ex-Im Bank financing, denial of U.S. export licenses, and denial of U.S. loans<br />
above $10 million. Other subsidiaries of Belneftekhim were sanctioned in 2007<br />
under Executive Order 13405 related to U.S. policy on Belarus.<br />
The Administration announcement did not indicate that some of the other investments in Table 4<br />
or other investments, for which no ISA determinations have been made to date, are still under<br />
investigation.<br />
May 24, 2011, <strong>Sanctions</strong> Imposed on Gasoline-Related Shippers<br />
On May 24, 2011, the Administration issued its first sanctions determinations under the CISADAamended<br />
“trigger” that requires sanctions against sales of gasoline and related equipment and<br />
services. The reasons for the sanctions, including size of gasoline shipments to <strong>Iran</strong>, as well as the<br />
ISA-related sanctions selected, can be found at http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2011/05/<br />
164132.htm. The seven firms sanctioned were<br />
• Petrochemical Commercial Company International (PCCI) of Bailiwick of<br />
Jersey and <strong>Iran</strong><br />
• Royal Oyster Group (UAE)<br />
• Tanker Pacific (Singapore)<br />
• Allvale Maritime (subsidiary of Ofer Brothers Group, Israel)<br />
• Societie Anonyme Monegasque Et Aerienne (SAMAMA, Monaco)<br />
• Speedy Ship (UAE/<strong>Iran</strong>)<br />
• Associated Shipbroking (Monaco)<br />
• Petroleos de Venezuela (PDVSA) of Venezuela<br />
The determinations of sanctionability of Allvale and SAMAMA were issued on September 13,<br />
2011, as a “clarification” of the May 24 determinations, which named Ofer Brothers Group (and<br />
not Allvale or SAMAMA) as sanctioned entities at that time. Those two entities, as well as<br />
Tanker Pacific are, according to an author conversation with an attorney for the Ofer Brothers<br />
Group, affiliated with a Europe-based trust linked to deceased Ofer brother Sami Ofer, and not<br />
Ofer Brothers Group based in Israel. Ofer Brothers Group, based in Israel, is not therefore under<br />
sanction. The firms named were subjected primarily to the financial-related sanctions provided in<br />
ISA. With respect to PDVSA, the Administration made clear in its announcement that U.S.-based<br />
Congressional Research Service 14