17.08.2013 Views

A particle-in-Burgers model: theory and numerics - Laboratoire de ...

A particle-in-Burgers model: theory and numerics - Laboratoire de ...

A particle-in-Burgers model: theory and numerics - Laboratoire de ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Mo<strong>de</strong>l <strong>and</strong> motivation Auxiliary steps Results h = 0: coupl<strong>in</strong>g h = 0: <strong>de</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ition, uniqueness h = 0: <strong>numerics</strong>, existence The coupled problem<br />

Case h = h(t): cont<strong>in</strong>uous <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nce en h(·), L ∞ <strong>and</strong> BV stability<br />

Proposition (BV estimate)<br />

The solution constructed for the h = 0 case obeys<br />

u(t,·)BV(R) ց for all t > 0<br />

(at t = 0 the variation may <strong>in</strong>crease by a const. <strong>de</strong>pend<strong>in</strong>g on u0∞,Gλ).<br />

The solution constructed for the fixed-h(·) case obeys the BV estimate<br />

u(t,·)BV(R) u0BV(R) + const(λ,u0∞)+2<br />

t<br />

0<br />

|h ′′ (s)| ds.<br />

Argument: (re)-construct solutions by wave-front track<strong>in</strong>g algorithm<br />

(Dafermos, Hol<strong>de</strong>n-Risebro, Bressan et al. ) (better control of <strong>in</strong>teractions).<br />

Lemma (L ∞ bounds)<br />

We get a uniform L ∞ bound on ad hoc sequences of h ′ (·) <strong>and</strong> u(·,·).<br />

To be precise: if we look at solutions to the coupled problem, we get<br />

max{u∞,h ′ ∞} max{u0∞,|h ′ (0)|}.<br />

For solutions appear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the fixed-po<strong>in</strong>t or splitt<strong>in</strong>g arguments, we get<br />

somewhat weaker bounds.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!