17.08.2013 Views

A particle-in-Burgers model: theory and numerics - Laboratoire de ...

A particle-in-Burgers model: theory and numerics - Laboratoire de ...

A particle-in-Burgers model: theory and numerics - Laboratoire de ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Mo<strong>de</strong>l <strong>and</strong> motivation Auxiliary steps Results h = 0: coupl<strong>in</strong>g h = 0: <strong>de</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ition, uniqueness h = 0: <strong>numerics</strong>, existence The coupled problem<br />

Mo<strong>de</strong>l <strong>and</strong> motivation...<br />

D’Alembert paradox : a solid immersed <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>viscid fluid is not<br />

submitted to any resultant force ; <strong>in</strong> other words, birds (<strong>and</strong> planes...)<br />

could not fly with a <strong>mo<strong>de</strong>l</strong> where viscosity is neglected ! Yet, <strong>in</strong>viscid<br />

(hyperbolic !) <strong>mo<strong>de</strong>l</strong>s are ok for some fluids...<br />

Answer 1 to the d’Alembert paradox: use viscous <strong>mo<strong>de</strong>l</strong>s of<br />

fluid-solid <strong>in</strong>teraction (see e.g. M. Hillairet , for a recent review).<br />

Answer 2 (when the Reynolds number is large): it is reasonable to<br />

neglect the viscous effects <strong>in</strong> the <strong>mo<strong>de</strong>l</strong> that governs the fluid ;<br />

but we have to conserve <strong>in</strong>formation from the vanish<strong>in</strong>g viscosity<br />

<strong>in</strong> a DRAG FORCE .<br />

The drag force takes the form of a source term which takes <strong>in</strong>to<br />

account the difference between the velocity of the fluid <strong>and</strong> the<br />

velocity of the solid.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!