17.08.2013 Views

A particle-in-Burgers model: theory and numerics - Laboratoire de ...

A particle-in-Burgers model: theory and numerics - Laboratoire de ...

A particle-in-Burgers model: theory and numerics - Laboratoire de ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Mo<strong>de</strong>l <strong>and</strong> motivation Auxiliary steps Results h = 0: coupl<strong>in</strong>g h = 0: <strong>de</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ition, uniqueness h = 0: <strong>numerics</strong>, existence The coupled problem<br />

Mo<strong>de</strong>l <strong>and</strong> motivation...<br />

D’Alembert paradox : a solid immersed <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>viscid fluid is not<br />

submitted to any resultant force ; <strong>in</strong> other words, birds (<strong>and</strong> planes...)<br />

could not fly with a <strong>mo<strong>de</strong>l</strong> where viscosity is neglected ! Yet, <strong>in</strong>viscid<br />

(hyperbolic !) <strong>mo<strong>de</strong>l</strong>s are ok for some fluids...<br />

Answer 1 to the d’Alembert paradox: use viscous <strong>mo<strong>de</strong>l</strong>s of<br />

fluid-solid <strong>in</strong>teraction (see e.g. M. Hillairet , for a recent review).<br />

Answer 2 (when the Reynolds number is large): it is reasonable to<br />

neglect the viscous effects <strong>in</strong> the <strong>mo<strong>de</strong>l</strong> that governs the fluid ;<br />

but we have to conserve <strong>in</strong>formation from the vanish<strong>in</strong>g viscosity<br />

<strong>in</strong> a DRAG FORCE .<br />

The drag force takes the form of a source term which takes <strong>in</strong>to<br />

account the difference between the velocity of the fluid <strong>and</strong> the<br />

velocity of the solid.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!