17.08.2013 Views

Solitons in Nonlocal Media

Solitons in Nonlocal Media

Solitons in Nonlocal Media

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1.3 <strong>Nonlocal</strong>ity<br />

specified, from here on I will consider homogeneous nonl<strong>in</strong>ear media, i.e. with ∆n not<br />

explicitly dependent on space 1 . Eq. (1.2) becomes<br />

∂A<br />

2ik0n0<br />

∂s + ∇2⊥ A + k2 02n0∆n(I)A = 0 (1.3)<br />

This is the nonl<strong>in</strong>ear Schröed<strong>in</strong>ger equation (NLSE) for a generalized nonl<strong>in</strong>earity,<br />

widely used <strong>in</strong> model<strong>in</strong>g spatial solitons. Assum<strong>in</strong>g a l<strong>in</strong>ear relationship between the<br />

<strong>in</strong>tensity I and the <strong>in</strong>dex perturbation ∆n (for example, thermo-optic media and liquid<br />

crystals <strong>in</strong> limited range of powers), and suppos<strong>in</strong>g that ∆n on a certa<strong>in</strong> plane normal<br />

to s depends on <strong>in</strong>tensity <strong>in</strong> that plane, 2 I get<br />

<br />

∆n =<br />

I(r ′ ⊥ )G(|r⊥ − r ′ ⊥ |)dS′<br />

(1.4)<br />

where dS ′ and r⊥ are the <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>itesimal area element and position vector on the<br />

transverse plane, respectively, and G(|r⊥ − r ′ ⊥ |) is the Green function for the material<br />

(32). I <strong>in</strong>troduced a Green function depend<strong>in</strong>g only on the distance between excitation<br />

and effect, that is, an <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>itely extended medium. F<strong>in</strong>ite geometries will be discussed<br />

<strong>in</strong> chapter 3.<br />

A nonl<strong>in</strong>ear material which is described by eqs. (1.3) and (1.4) is nonlocal Kerr. In<br />

local Kerr media I have ∆n = n2I and eq. (1.3) turns <strong>in</strong>to the classical NLSE, which<br />

is <strong>in</strong>tegrable and supports the fundamental soliton with a sech profile (6).<br />

Different ranges of nonlocality have been discussed <strong>in</strong> literature: from high (31; 39; 50;<br />

51; 52; 53; 54) to weak (32; 55).<br />

1.3.1 Strong <strong>Nonlocal</strong>ity<br />

Let me beg<strong>in</strong> with the highly nonlocal case and, for the sake of simplicity, explore its<br />

features <strong>in</strong> a one dimensional geometry. Expand<strong>in</strong>g G(x − x ′ ) <strong>in</strong> eq. (1.4) <strong>in</strong> a Taylor<br />

series around the po<strong>in</strong>t x = x ′3 , I get:<br />

1 I note that the nonl<strong>in</strong>ear <strong>in</strong>dex perturbation is vary<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> space due to its dependence on I.<br />

2 Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the hypothesis, ∆n is governed by L(∆n) = I with L a certa<strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>ear differential<br />

operator; <strong>in</strong> case of solitary propagation I have that all the s derivatives become null due to the<br />

<strong>in</strong>variance <strong>in</strong> propagation, hence the <strong>in</strong>dex perturbation on a plane normal to s depends only on<br />

<strong>in</strong>tensity computed on that plane.<br />

3 I implicitly assume that the Green function is derivable <strong>in</strong> x = x ′ ; this is not always true, as it<br />

will be shown <strong>in</strong> chapter 3.<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!