25.08.2013 Views

development of micro-pattern gaseous detectors – gem - LMU

development of micro-pattern gaseous detectors – gem - LMU

development of micro-pattern gaseous detectors – gem - LMU

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 5<br />

Efficiency Determination<br />

This chapter addresses the efficiency <strong>of</strong> prototype 1.0. Since the trigger scintillators cover a larger<br />

area than the active size <strong>of</strong> the detector one has to correct for a geometrical factor which is presented<br />

in Ch. 5.1. The efficiency <strong>of</strong> prototype 1.0 equipped with an unsegmented anode is illustrated in Ch.<br />

5.2. With the installation <strong>of</strong> a flow and pressure control unit in the gas system as well as optimized<br />

operational voltage settings one obtains an optimized efficiency which is reported in Ch. 5.3.<br />

The efficiency ε is defined as the ratio <strong>of</strong> recorded signals S over the sum <strong>of</strong> all triggering events<br />

Stotal:<br />

5.1 Efficiency Simulation<br />

ε = S<br />

Stotal<br />

= Ndetected particles<br />

Ntotal particles<br />

The measurement <strong>of</strong> the efficiency is realized by two scalers (cf. Fig. 3.9). One <strong>of</strong> them counts the<br />

triple coincidence between detector and the two trigger scintillators, the other counts the two trigger<br />

scintillators alone. The threefold coincidence <strong>of</strong> scintillator triggers combined with the GEM’s signal<br />

is the real number <strong>of</strong> detected particles that are recorded by the FADC. Coincidence <strong>of</strong> the GEM<br />

surrounding scintillators gives the number <strong>of</strong> total particle that are crossing the active detection area.<br />

Since the surface <strong>of</strong> the two scintillators is about 40 % bigger than the <strong>detectors</strong> active area and taking<br />

their rectangular positioning into account, one has to correct the number <strong>of</strong> two-fold coincidences by<br />

the geometrical factor. A MonteCarlo Simulation is implemented to derive the real count rate <strong>of</strong><br />

particle traversing the active area <strong>of</strong> the GEM detector or scintillators.<br />

As illustrated in Fig. 5.1, the two scintillators are abstracted to rectangles, consisting <strong>of</strong> a lower and an<br />

upper plane. The GEM detector itself is represented by a simple plane, centered to the surface covered<br />

by both triggering <strong>detectors</strong>. For points placed in small equidistant steps on the lower and upper<br />

surface <strong>of</strong> Sc1 a large number <strong>of</strong> muons is simulated with incident directions defined by the angles θ<br />

and φ. It was assumed that the incident angles are distributed as f (θ) = cos 2 θ and normalized for<br />

the φ - coordinate via g(φ) = 1/2π. The values <strong>of</strong> the direction vector are transformed to Cartesian<br />

coordinates:<br />

direc[0] = cos(φ) sin(θ)<br />

direc[1] = sin(φ) sin(θ)<br />

direc[2] = cos(θ) .<br />

57<br />

(5.1)<br />

(5.2)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!