25.08.2013 Views

development of micro-pattern gaseous detectors – gem - LMU

development of micro-pattern gaseous detectors – gem - LMU

development of micro-pattern gaseous detectors – gem - LMU

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

68 Chapter 6 Rise Time Studies<br />

2 ns<br />

> 10 ns<br />

Channel 1) Preamplifier response to 2ns pulse<br />

Channel 4) Scintillator pulse exiting differentiating circuit<br />

Figure 6.7: Response <strong>of</strong> the CASTA82<br />

preamplifier to a δ - shaped pulse <strong>of</strong> 2 ns<br />

width.<br />

for the CATSA82 preamplifier and<br />

2 ns<br />

10 ns<br />

Channel 1) Preamplifier response to 2ns pulse<br />

Channel 4) Scintillator pulse exiting differentiating circuit<br />

Figure 6.8: Response <strong>of</strong> the ELab preamplifier<br />

to a δ - shaped pulse <strong>of</strong> 2 ns width.<br />

τ = R · Ccoupl = 2.5Ω · 1.5 nF = 3.75 ns (6.3)<br />

regarding the ELab preamplifier. This estimation shows that the ELab preamplifiers rise time is<br />

negligible whereas the big coupling capacity <strong>of</strong> the CATSA82 preamplifier affects the rise time<br />

distribution significantly.<br />

In order to analyze the internal response time <strong>of</strong> the preamplifiers a δ-like pulse <strong>of</strong> 2 ns width and 10<br />

mV maximum pulse height is fed to the input. Since the trigger scintillators provide a frequent signal<br />

we can use this as a pulse generator. Combined with a discriminator and dual timer as already used<br />

in the conventional readout, see Ch. 3.4.1, the resulting box-shaped pulse is fed to a differentiating<br />

circuit. This setup supplies the narrow pulse which can be seen in Fig. 6.7 and Fig. 6.8 together with<br />

the response <strong>of</strong> the two preamplifiers. In this manner the internal rise time <strong>of</strong> the preamplifiers is<br />

determined to approximately 10 ns for both (see channels no. 1 in the corresponding Fig. 6.7 and<br />

6.8). The differentiating circuit transfers the scintillator pulse to a sharp negative pulse followed by a<br />

smaller overshoot that is repeated around 14 ns after the main pulse. The overshoot with 2 ns delay<br />

after the main pulse is not resolved by the preamplifiers. A plateau <strong>of</strong> the rise time is reached in 10 ns<br />

after the main pulse. The second small positive pulse <strong>of</strong> the test signal gives a second rise to the<br />

preamplifier response. The CATSA82 preamplifier shows a slightly faster response to the δ - shaped<br />

pulse than the ELab preamplifier whose amplitude is 50% higher, in contrast.<br />

This rise time is negligible in comparison to the 100 ns electron drift time and the 55 Fe induced rise<br />

times around 106 or 166 ns.<br />

6.2 Rise Time Dependence on Induction - Field<br />

In order to understand the signal rise time formation, data were taken in dependence <strong>of</strong> the E-field<br />

on the induction gap with the X-ray source as well as with cosmic ray muons. This is motivated by<br />

the estimate that the detectable pulse begins with the presence <strong>of</strong> the amplified charges at the lower

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!