31.08.2013 Views

Apixaban for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in people ...

Apixaban for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in people ...

Apixaban for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in people ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5 COST EFFECTIVENESS ....................................................................................................... 33<br />

5.1 ERG comment on manufacturer’s review <strong>of</strong> cost-effectiveness evidence ............................ 33<br />

5.1.1 State objective <strong>of</strong> cost effectiveness review. Provide description <strong>of</strong> manufacturers<br />

search strategy and comment on whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> search strategy was appropriate. If <strong>the</strong><br />

manufacturer did not per<strong>for</strong>m a systematic review, was this appropriate? ................................ 33<br />

5.1.2 State <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>clusion/exclusion criteria used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> study selection and comment on<br />

whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y were appropriate. ................................................................................................ 33<br />

5.1.3 What studies were <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> cost effectiveness review and what were excluded?<br />

Where appropriate, provide a table <strong>of</strong> identified studies. Please identify <strong>the</strong> most important cost<br />

effectiveness studies. ............................................................................................................... 33<br />

5.1.4 What does <strong>the</strong> review conclude from <strong>the</strong> data available? Does <strong>the</strong> ERG agree with <strong>the</strong><br />

conclusions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cost effectiveness review? If not, provide details......................................... 34<br />

5.2 Summary and critique <strong>of</strong> manufacturer’s submitted economic evaluation by <strong>the</strong> ERG ....... 36<br />

5.2.1 NICE reference case checklist (TABLE ONLY) ....................................................... 36<br />

5.2.2 Model structure ........................................................................................................ 37<br />

5.2.3 Population ................................................................................................................ 40<br />

5.2.4 Interventions and comparators .................................................................................. 40<br />

5.2.5 Perspective, time horizon and discount<strong>in</strong>g ................................................................ 41<br />

5.2.6 Treatment effectiveness ............................................................................................ 42<br />

5.2.7 Health related quality <strong>of</strong> life ..................................................................................... 47<br />

5.2.8 Resources and costs .................................................................................................. 49<br />

5.2.9 Cost effectiveness results .......................................................................................... 53<br />

5.2.10 Sensitivity analyses .................................................................................................. 57<br />

5.2.11 Model validation ...................................................................................................... 66<br />

5.3 Additional work undertaken by <strong>the</strong> ERG ........................................................................... 66<br />

5.4 Conclusions ..................................................................................................................... 69<br />

6 Impact on <strong>the</strong> ICER <strong>of</strong> additional cl<strong>in</strong>ical and economic analyses undertaken by <strong>the</strong> ERG ....... 69<br />

7 End <strong>of</strong> life ............................................................................................................................... 69<br />

8 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................ 69<br />

8.1 Implications <strong>for</strong> research ................................................................................................. 70<br />

References....................................................................................................................................... 71<br />

Appendix 1A: ERG Search Strategies .............................................................................................. 77<br />

Appendix 1B: Review <strong>of</strong> search strategies <strong>for</strong> <strong>Apixaban</strong> studies ...................................................... 87<br />

Appendix 2: Phillips et al. Checklist ................................................................................................ 89<br />

6<br />

Copyright 2011 Queen’s Pr<strong>in</strong>ter and Controller <strong>of</strong> HMSO. All rights reserved.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!