31.08.2013 Views

Rivaroxaban for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and ...

Rivaroxaban for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and ...

Rivaroxaban for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6.5. Exploratory analysis in cancer patients – examining different HR<br />

The ERG explored 3 scenarios, using <strong>the</strong> mean HR/OR assuming a between study variability <strong>of</strong><br />

U(0,5), U(0,2) <strong>and</strong> U(U,0.6).<br />

In addition to <strong>the</strong> above, <strong>the</strong> ERG corrected <strong>the</strong> following errors:<br />

- xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, <strong>the</strong> cell was linked to <strong>the</strong> wrong cell cccccccccccc).<br />

- Finally, an error is corrected <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> probability <strong>of</strong> PE recurrences (xxxxxxxxxxxxx4) after <strong>the</strong><br />

first year (which had been incorrectly divided by 4).<br />

Results are presented <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> deterministic sensitivity analysis as <strong>the</strong>re were issues with <strong>the</strong> PSA. A<br />

summary <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> analyses undertaken by <strong>the</strong> ERG are provided in Table 57.<br />

The ERG believes <strong>the</strong>se results to be exploratory ra<strong>the</strong>r than definitive due to <strong>the</strong> caveats listed below.<br />

The main uncertainties within <strong>the</strong> analyses relate to:<br />

- The baseline risk <strong>of</strong> events – it was necessary <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> manufacturer to make a series <strong>of</strong><br />

assumptions to represent <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> events, <strong>and</strong> it is unclear to what extent this reflect <strong>the</strong> risk<br />

<strong>of</strong> events in <strong>the</strong> cancer population,<br />

- The <strong>treatment</strong> effect was taken from <strong>the</strong> MTC, however <strong>the</strong>re were considerable uncertainty<br />

in <strong>the</strong> relative <strong>treatment</strong> effects,<br />

- Data not specific to cancer patients were used <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> events once <strong>treatment</strong> cease; it is<br />

unclear if this is appropriate. The ERG did not conduct a systematic review <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> literature,<br />

but found a study showing that <strong>the</strong> probability <strong>of</strong> readmission <strong>for</strong> VTEs within 6 months was<br />

almost four times higher among Medicare patients with cancer than among Medicare patients<br />

without malignancy.<br />

- The manufacturer assumed a median life expectancy <strong>of</strong> 5 years, however it is unclear if this<br />

reflect <strong>the</strong> life expectancy <strong>of</strong> patients with a DVT.<br />

- The manufacturer also assumed <strong>the</strong> same baseline utility value <strong>and</strong> impact on Qol in <strong>the</strong><br />

general population <strong>and</strong> patients with cancer. It is likely that <strong>the</strong> baseline utility value is<br />

different between cancer vs. non cancer patients. The impact <strong>of</strong> VTEs in cancer patients may<br />

also be different.<br />

162<br />

Copyright 2012 Queen's Printer <strong>and</strong> Controller <strong>of</strong> HMSO. All rights reserved.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!