Theory, Design and Tests on a Prototype Module of a Compact ...
Theory, Design and Tests on a Prototype Module of a Compact ...
Theory, Design and Tests on a Prototype Module of a Compact ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
58 4. CIRCUIT MODEL<br />
For the derivative with respect to ε L,R<br />
p , we have to c<strong>on</strong>sider all the<br />
terms, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> by c<strong>on</strong>sidering the following trig<strong>on</strong>ometric identities<br />
sinh (N − 2p + 1)x = j(−1) p cos N π<br />
cosh (N − 2p + 1)∆x<br />
2<br />
cosh x = j sinh ∆x<br />
sinh (N − 1)x = j sin (N − 1) π<br />
cosh (N − 1)∆x<br />
2<br />
cosh Nx = cos N π<br />
cosh N∆x<br />
2<br />
cosh (N − 1)x = j sin (N − 1) π<br />
(4.50)<br />
sinh (N − 1)∆x<br />
2<br />
the expressi<strong>on</strong> (4.48) becomes<br />
<br />
N<br />
<br />
Ti = −ωM cos N π<br />
N<br />
cosh ∆x sinh N∆x + j sin (N − 1)π<br />
2 2<br />
i=1<br />
12<br />
· [− cosh ∆x cosh (N − 1)∆x − sinh ∆x sinh (N − 1)∆x]<br />
N<br />
− ε<br />
p=1<br />
+ <br />
p sinh ∆x cosh (2p − N − 1)(j π<br />
<br />
+ ∆x)<br />
2<br />
N<br />
<br />
−j<br />
p=1<br />
ε − p cosh ∆x(−1) p cos N π<br />
cosh (N − 2p + 1)∆x<br />
2<br />
= f(∆x, ε L p , ε R p )<br />
p=1<br />
ε + p<br />
(4.51)<br />
In the derivative with respect to ε L,R<br />
p , the <strong>on</strong>ly term different from zero<br />
comes from i = p. For example, the term in ε L p is<br />
∂f<br />
∂εL = −j<br />
p<br />
ωM<br />
2 ·<br />
<br />
sin (N − 1) π<br />
[cosh ∆x cosh (N − 1)∆x + sinh ∆x sinh (N − 1)∆x]<br />
2<br />
<br />
− 2j sinh ∆x cosh (2p − N − 1)(j π<br />
<br />
+ ∆x)<br />
2<br />
cosh ∆x(−1) p cos N π<br />
<br />
cosh (N − 2p + 1)∆x<br />
2<br />
And finally, the res<strong>on</strong>ance equati<strong>on</strong> is<br />
jωM cos N π<br />
<br />
N<br />
ε<br />
2<br />
+ p + jN∆x + (−1) p<br />
N<br />
ε − <br />
p = 0<br />
p=1<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> therefore the unknown is<br />
∆x = j 1<br />
N<br />
<br />
L εp + ε<br />
N<br />
R p<br />
2<br />
p=1<br />
+ (−1) p εR p − ε L p<br />
2<br />
<br />
p=1<br />
= j<br />
N<br />
p=1 ε∗ p<br />
N<br />
(4.52)