10.11.2013 Views

Haiti Earthquake Reconstruction Knowledge Notes from ... - GFDRR

Haiti Earthquake Reconstruction Knowledge Notes from ... - GFDRR

Haiti Earthquake Reconstruction Knowledge Notes from ... - GFDRR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Managing the Recovery | 13<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

Implementation of key projects and programs<br />

through line ministries where capacity exists.<br />

Where capacity does not exist or where delivery<br />

is delayed, implementation through parallel<br />

structures such as NGOs and UN agencies.<br />

■■ Gradual strengthening of line ministry capacity<br />

to implement critical projects and programs as<br />

well as to supervise and facilitate off-budget<br />

activities.<br />

The advantages (+) and disadvantages (-) of each<br />

approach in the <strong>Haiti</strong>an context are as follows:<br />

Recovery Agency Line Ministries Hybrid Approach<br />

+ Can accelerate coordination and + Respects and strengthens existing + Respects and strengthens existing<br />

+<br />

implementation of recovery.<br />

Models of good practice exist with<br />

government structure and<br />

capacities.<br />

government structure and<br />

capacities.<br />

features that can be replicated. + Does not create additional<br />

+ Has a light structure therefore can<br />

+ Can draw on resources beyond the competition for resources and be easily dissolved at the end of<br />

+<br />

civil service resource pool.<br />

Can focus on tasks that are +<br />

power.<br />

Facilitates transition <strong>from</strong><br />

+<br />

reconstruction.<br />

Provides additional capacity to<br />

specific to reconstruction (e.g.,<br />

land acquisition, development of<br />

reconstruction policy).<br />

reconstruction to longer-term<br />

development.<br />

+<br />

line ministries whose capacities<br />

and resources are under immense<br />

pressure.<br />

Provides a single point of<br />

+<br />

responsibility for managing<br />

reconstruction.<br />

Can focus on tasks that are<br />

specific to reconstruction (e.g.,<br />

land acquisition, development of<br />

reconstruction policy, aid tracking).<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

Potential for rivalry among existing<br />

agencies.<br />

Takes more time and resources to<br />

establish than expected.<br />

Requires existence of strong<br />

central government for support<br />

and authority.<br />

Can create issues of sustainability<br />

of reconstruction ‘investment.’<br />

Does not strengthen existing<br />

government bodies.<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

Capacity was low before<br />

earthquake and with the<br />

earthquake, has been further<br />

curtailed.<br />

Line ministries drawn away <strong>from</strong><br />

their routine work.<br />

Requires third-party<br />

implementation.<br />

Does not address specific<br />

reconstruction activities<br />

(e.g., coordination of offbudget<br />

funds and continuous<br />

communication with stakeholders<br />

on reconstruction progress, and<br />

upholding transparency and<br />

accountability).<br />

-<br />

-<br />

Light structure may not be<br />

sufficient to deal with the enormity<br />

of the task.<br />

May lack the political weight<br />

necessary to coordinate other line<br />

ministries or other reconstruction<br />

actors.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!