Performance of Special Extinguishment Agents for ... - UL.com

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Issued: September 30, 2008 Figures FIGURE 1 – POUR POINT COMPARISON OF AGENTS..............................................................................................10 FIGURE 2 – MISCIBILITY OF AGENTS ....................................................................................................................11 FIGURE 3 – SEPARATION DATA.............................................................................................................................12 FIGURE 4 – SURFACE TENSION OF A 1 PERCENT SOLUTION.................................................................................13 FIGURE 5 - SURFACE TENSION OF A 1 PERCENT SOLUTION – LOW TEMPERATURE.............................................14 FIGURE 6 – MEASUREMENT OF PH FOR AGENT SAMPLES ....................................................................................14 FIGURE 7 - VISCOSITY OF AGENT SAMPLES AT VARIOUS TEMPERATURES..........................................................16 FIGURE 8 – CORROSION OF METALS FROM AGENT CONCENTRATE ....................................................................17 FIGURE 9 - CORROSION OF METALS FROM 1 PERCENT AGENT SOLUTION ...........................................................18 FIGURE 10 – CONVECTIVE HEAT RELEASE RATE OF HAND HELD EXTINGUISHER TEST SERIES.........................20 FIGURE 11 – TOTAL CHEMICAL HEAT RELEASE RATE OF HAND HELD EXTINGUISHER TEST SERIES.................20 FIGURE 12 – WIDE SPRAY PATTERN EXPANSION RATIO OF AGENTS...................................................................21 FIGURE 13 – STRAIGHT STREAM PATTERN EXPANSION RATIO OF AGENTS.........................................................22 FIGURE 14 – WIDE SPRAY PATTERN RANGE COMPARISON..................................................................................23 FIGURE 15 – STRAIGHT STREAM PATTERN RANGE COMPARISON .......................................................................23 FIGURE 16. TEST FACILITY ...................................................................................................................................25 FIGURE 17 – INSTRUMENTATION MAP OF ROOM AND CORRIDOR – PLAN VIEW .................................................26 FIGURE 18 – LAYOUT OF FUEL PACKAGE IN LIVING ROOM – PLAN VIEW ..........................................................30 FIGURE 19 – FREEBURN HEAT RELEASE RATE VERSUS TIME CURVE..................................................................31 FIGURE 20 – CONVECTIVE HEAT RELEASE RATE VERSUS TIME CHART ..............................................................34 FIGURE 21 – TOTAL CHEMICAL HEAT RELEASE RATE VERSUS TIME CHART......................................................35 FIGURE 22 – HEAT RELEASE RATE REDUCTION COMPARISON – CONVECTIVE HEAT RELEASE RATE................36 FIGURE 23 - HEAT RELEASE RATE REDUCTION COMPARISON – TOTAL HEAT RELEASE RATE .........................36 FIGURE 24 – AVERAGE CEILING TEMPERATURE IN LIVING ROOM SPACE COMPARISON ....................................37 FIGURE 25 – AVERAGE CEILING TEMPERATURE IN CORRIDOR SPACE COMPARISON..........................................37 FIGURE 26 - HEAT RELEASE RATE REDUCTION COMPARISON – CONVECTIVE HEAT RELEASE RATE ................39 FIGURE 27 – HEAT RELEASE RATE REDUCTION COMPARISON – TIME PERCENTAGE DIFFERENTIAL .................39 FIGURE 28 - HEAT RELEASE RATE REDUCTION COMPARISON – TOTAL HEAT RELEASE RATE ..........................40 FIGURE 29 - HEAT RELEASE RATE REDUCTION COMPARISON – TIME PERCENTAGE DIFFERENTIAL..................40 FIGURE 30 – LIVING ROOM CEILING TEMPERATURE REDUCTION COMPARISON................................................41 FIGURE 31 – CORRIDOR CEILING TEMPERATURE REDUCTION COMPARISON ......................................................42 FIGURE 32 - HEAT RELEASE RATE REDUCTION COMPARISON – CONVECTIVE HEAT RELEASE RATE ................44 FIGURE 33 – HEAT RELEASE RATE REDUCTION COMPARISON – TIME PERCENTAGE DIFFERENTIAL.................44 FIGURE 34 - HEAT RELEASE RATE REDUCTION COMPARISON – TOTAL HEAT RELEASE RATE ..........................45 FIGURE 35 - HEAT RELEASE RATE REDUCTION COMPARISON – TIME PERCENTAGE DIFFERENTIAL..................45 FIGURE 36 – LIVING ROOM CEILING TEMPERATURE REDUCTION COMPARISON................................................46 FIGURE 37 – CORRIDOR CEILING TEMPERATURE REDUCTION COMPARISON......................................................47 FIGURE 38 – FREEBURN HEAT RELEASE RATE OF <strong>UL</strong> 711 6A WOOD CRIB ........................................................49 FIGURE 39 – CONVECTIVE HEAT RELEASE RATE CURVE FOR WOOD CRIB WATER ONLY TESTING...................50 FIGURE 40 – WATER ONLY VERSUS 1.0 PERCENT AGENT CONCENTRATION HEAT RELEASE RATE COMPARISON DATA ............................................................................................................................................................51 FIGURE 41– WATER ONLY VERSUS 0.5 PERCENT AGENT CONCENTRATION HEAT RELEASE RATE COMPARISON DATA ............................................................................................................................................................52 v
Issued: September 30, 2008 Abbreviations °C degrees Centigrade CFM cubic feet per minute ft. foot °F degrees Fahrenheit gpm gallons per minute in. inch kW Kilowatts MW Megawatts m meter RTI Response time index <strong>UL</strong> Underwriters Laboratories Inc. dno Did not operate vi
Page 1 and 2: Performance of Special Extinguishme
Page 3 and 4: Issued: September 30, 2008 Two diff
Page 5: Issued: September 30, 2008 8.6.3 Te
Page 9 and 10: Issued: September 30, 2008 there ar
Page 11 and 12: Issued: September 30, 2008 Code dev
Page 13 and 14: Issued: September 30, 2008 producti
Page 15 and 16: Issued: September 30, 2008 13. Hjoh
Page 17 and 18: Issued: September 30, 2008 5.1 Pour
Page 19 and 20: Issued: September 30, 2008 5.3 Sepa
Page 21 and 22: Issued: September 30, 2008 Figure 5
Page 27 and 28: Issued: September 30, 2008 2,500 He
Page 29 and 30: Issued: September 30, 2008 7.2 Disc
Page 31 and 32: Issued: September 30, 2008 8. TASK
Page 33 and 34: Issued: September 30, 2008 End Tabl
Page 35 and 36: Issued: September 30, 2008 8.3.3 Sm
Page 37 and 38: Issued: September 30, 2008 was used
Page 39 and 40: Issued: September 30, 2008 8.6.3 Te
Page 41 and 42: Issued: September 30, 2008 9.3.5 Te
Page 53 and 54: Issued: September 30, 2008 As can b
Page 57 and 58:
Issued: September 30, 2008 11.4 Wat
Page 59 and 60:
Issued: September 30, 2008 Using th
Page 61 and 62:
Issued: September 30, 2008 room and
Page 63 and 64:
Appendix A -Photographs of Living R
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Appendix B -Instrumentation Photogr
Page 71 and 72:
Appendix B -Instrumentation Photogr
Page 73 and 74:
Appendix C - Fire Propagation Photo
Page 75 and 76:
Appendix C - Fire Propagation Photo
Page 77 and 78:
Appendix D - Fire Fighting Tactics
Page 79 and 80:
Appendix D - Fire Fighting Tactics
Page 81 and 82:
Appendix E - Smoke Obscuration Data
Page 83 and 84:
Appendix F - Oxygen Concentration D
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Appendix G - Wood Crib - Agent Test
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99:
show all

Performance of Special Extinguishment Agents for ... - UL.com

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?