25.12.2013 Views

mohammad tabish ahmed - eTheses Repository - University of ...

mohammad tabish ahmed - eTheses Repository - University of ...

mohammad tabish ahmed - eTheses Repository - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 3<br />

The results from these complementation plates showed that Cpn60.2 can complement in<br />

MGM100 under appropriate conditions. However, Cpn60.1 failed to complement,<br />

irrespective <strong>of</strong> which cochaperonin it was co-expressed with. There are two possible reasons<br />

for this result. Either Cpn60.1 was incapable <strong>of</strong> recognising and/or folding the required<br />

GroEL substrates or the expression level <strong>of</strong> Cpn60.1 was too low. Therefore, the levels <strong>of</strong><br />

Cpn60.1 expression were estimated from SDS-PAGE gels <strong>of</strong> whole cell lysates. It was<br />

expected that the expression <strong>of</strong> all the chaperonins and cochaperonins from the pTrc plasmid<br />

would increase in the presence <strong>of</strong> IPTG, and that this would be distinguishable on a SDS-<br />

PAGE gel. A lower concentration <strong>of</strong> IPTG (0.1 mM) was used to reduce cell death in the<br />

over-night cultures. The results obtained from the SDS-PAGE gels showed that the<br />

expression <strong>of</strong> Cpn60.2 was distinguishable with both cochaperonins. The expression level <strong>of</strong><br />

Cpn60.1 however, was much lower and could only be seen when co-expressed with GroES<br />

(fig 3.4a). MS confirmed that the band was Cpn60.1. As a result, it could be speculated that<br />

the level <strong>of</strong> expression <strong>of</strong> Cpn60.1 may not have been high enough to sustain cell growth.<br />

However a point to note here is that although the level <strong>of</strong> expression <strong>of</strong> Cpn60.1 was low, it<br />

was not nonexistent. Interestingly, it was also observed that MetE was over-expressed in<br />

cells expressing Cpn60.1 both with and without IPTG, but only in cells expressing Cpn60.2<br />

when IPTG was not present (fig 3.4b). When Cpn60.2 is over-expressed with IPTG, the MetE<br />

band cannot be seen. This further supports the hypothesis that Cpn60.2 can function as a<br />

chaperonin in E. coli while Cpn60.1 cannot.<br />

Based on the results obtained in this experiment it can be concluded that Cpn60.2 from M.<br />

tuberculosis is capable <strong>of</strong> functioning as a chaperonin in E. coli. Cpn60.1 was unable to<br />

complement for the loss <strong>of</strong> endogenous GroEL, but this could be attributed to its low<br />

expression levels. To try and remedy this lack <strong>of</strong> expression various experiments were<br />

110

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!