30.12.2013 Views

Program, Abstracts, and Guidebooks - University of Minnesota Duluth

Program, Abstracts, and Guidebooks - University of Minnesota Duluth

Program, Abstracts, and Guidebooks - University of Minnesota Duluth

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

—72—<br />

the Quetico belt by Stockwell (1964). The relationship between<br />

these two belts has been considered in recent papers by Goodwin<br />

(1968), Kalliokoski (1968) <strong>and</strong> Ayres (1969, 1970). Goodwin <strong>and</strong><br />

Kalliokoski postulate that the Keewatin belt is older than the<br />

Quetico belt while Ayres suggested that Quetico rocks are over—<br />

lain by those <strong>of</strong> the Keewatin belt.<br />

Early Precambrian Metavolcanic <strong>and</strong> Metasedimentar"T Rocks<br />

1. Lithologies:<br />

A — Metasediments<br />

Metasedimentary rocks form two distinct lithologic groups:<br />

a thick sequence <strong>of</strong> relatively uniform greywacke, siltstone, <strong>and</strong><br />

argillite that is predominantly within the Quetico belt; <strong>and</strong> a<br />

thinner sequence more variable <strong>and</strong> coarser—grained <strong>of</strong> conglomerate,<br />

greywacke, argillite <strong>and</strong> iron formation that isinterlayered with<br />

metavolcanic formations <strong>of</strong> the Keewatin belt. The finer—grained<br />

metasediments within the Quetico belt <strong>and</strong> the southern part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Keewatin belt have been tentatively correlated with the Couchiching<br />

formation by many authors (liorwood <strong>and</strong> Pye, 1955; Macdonald, 1942;<br />

Pye, 1952). The coarser grained metasediments within the Keewatin<br />

belt form part <strong>of</strong> the Windigokan series <strong>of</strong> Tanton (1921).<br />

B —<br />

Metavolcanics<br />

The metavolcanic rocks in the southern part <strong>of</strong> the area are<br />

predominantly maf Ic to intermediate, massive, pillowed <strong>and</strong> amygdaloidal<br />

flows. In the northwestern part <strong>of</strong> the belt, however, intermediate to<br />

felsic volcanic breccias <strong>and</strong> flows are abundant.<br />

2. Stratigraphic Relationships:<br />

Reconstruction <strong>of</strong> the stratigraphy is difficult because <strong>of</strong><br />

paucity <strong>of</strong> good exposure along contacts, deformation by folding <strong>and</strong><br />

faulting, <strong>and</strong> interfingering <strong>of</strong> the various units.<br />

In the southern part <strong>of</strong> the area the finer—grained relatively<br />

un:iform metasediments (Couchiching) are overlain in most cases by<br />

the coarser—grained lithologically heterogeneous<br />

m?tasediments (Windigokan). Both <strong>of</strong> these units thin northward<br />

<strong>and</strong> interfinger the metavolcanic sequence.<br />

The finer—grained metasedimentary unit contains a thin but<br />

laterally extensive mafic metavolcanic unit that defines the boundary<br />

between the Quetico <strong>and</strong> Keewatin belts. Metasediments above<br />

<strong>and</strong> below this metavolcanic unit are lithologically similar (Peach,<br />

1951; Mackasey, 1970). Metasedimepts above the metavolcanic unit<br />

are part <strong>of</strong> PyeTs (1952) group B defined in the eastern part <strong>of</strong> the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!