Islam: A Guide for Jews and Christians - Electric Scotland
Islam: A Guide for Jews and Christians - Electric Scotland
Islam: A Guide for Jews and Christians - Electric Scotland
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
194 t CHAPTER EIGHT<br />
How are these clear statements in theQuran <strong>and</strong> hadith to be<br />
reconciled with “There is no coercion in religion” or even the Prophet’s<br />
apparent resigned tolerance early in his Meccan days? “You<br />
have your religion,” he was instructed to say to the pagans, “<strong>and</strong> I<br />
have mine” (109:6). Muslim exegetes <strong>and</strong> lawyers were quite as<br />
capable as their Jewish <strong>and</strong> Christian counterparts at harmonizing<br />
the apparent contradictions of Scripture, but in this instance they<br />
felt there was little need. The consensus opinion was that the later<br />
verse, “Fight against those who do not believe in God,” abrogated<br />
or canceled the earlier, “There is no compulsion in religion.” Officially,<br />
then, there was no religious tolerance in <strong>Islam</strong> save <strong>for</strong> <strong>Jews</strong><br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>Christians</strong> <strong>and</strong> then only under the negotiated capitulation<br />
contract called the dhimma.<br />
Dhimma <strong>and</strong> Dhimmis<br />
Muhammad’s attitude toward the People of the Book, as he called<br />
those who shared the same scriptural tradition with <strong>Islam</strong>, was<br />
generally favorable. Early on, in fact, he had called on them to<br />
verify his message. But as time passed, the Quran came to look on<br />
<strong>Jews</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Christians</strong> as adherents of rival rather than collegial<br />
faiths. Some of this change in attitude was dictated by events at<br />
Medina itself, where Jewish tribes made up part of the population.<br />
Not only did the <strong>Jews</strong> of Medina reject Muhammad’s prophetic<br />
claims; they began secretly to connive with his enemies in Mecca to<br />
overthrow him. Muhammad’s own reaction was determined <strong>and</strong><br />
progressively more violent. As the Prophet’s political strength in<br />
the oasis grew, the Jewish tribes of Medina were first banished,<br />
then taken <strong>and</strong> enslaved, <strong>and</strong> finally executed on the spot. This<br />
quite extraordinary behavior is matched by nothing in the Quran,<br />
<strong>and</strong> is quite at odds with Muhammad’s treatment of the <strong>Jews</strong> he<br />
encountered outside Medina. We must think then that his action<br />
was essentially political, that it was prompted by behavior that he<br />
read as treasonous <strong>and</strong> not some transgression of the law of God.<br />
That later encounter with <strong>Jews</strong> took place in 627 in the course<br />
of a raid on Khaibar <strong>and</strong> Faydak, two oases north of Medina