Production and Industrial Facilities - INSPIRE - Europa
Production and Industrial Facilities - INSPIRE - Europa
Production and Industrial Facilities - INSPIRE - Europa
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>INSPIRE</strong> Reference: D2.8.III.8_v2.0(.0)<br />
TWG-PF Data Specification on <strong>Production</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>Industrial</strong> <strong>Facilities</strong><br />
7.1.3 Logical Consistency – Topological consistency<br />
7.1.5 Positional accuracy – Absolute or external accuracy<br />
7.1.6 Thematic accuracy –<br />
7.1.1 Completeness – Commission<br />
Commission should be documented using the rate of excess items.<br />
2011-06-15 Page LV<br />
Name Rate of excess items<br />
Alternative name –<br />
Data quality element Completeness<br />
Data quality sub-element Commission<br />
Data quality basic measure Error rate<br />
Definition Number of excess items in the dataset in relation to the number of<br />
items that should have been present.<br />
Description -<br />
Evaluation scope data set<br />
Reporting scope data set<br />
Parameter –<br />
Data quality value type Real, percentage, ratio (example: 0,0189 ; 98,11% ; 11:582)<br />
Data quality value structure –<br />
Source reference –<br />
Example Only entities directly related with <strong>Production</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Industrial</strong> <strong>Facilities</strong><br />
as is described on the scope should be included on the Dataset.<br />
Other entities closely related could be included on the provided<br />
Datasets.<br />
Measure identifier 3 (ISO 19138)<br />
7.1.2 Completeness – Omission<br />
Omission should be documented using the rate of missing items.<br />
Name Rate of missing items<br />
Alternative name –<br />
Data quality element Completeness<br />
Data quality sub-element Omission<br />
Data quality basic measure Error rate<br />
Definition Number of missing items in the dataset in relation to the number of<br />
items that should have been present.<br />
Description -<br />
Evaluation scope data set<br />
Reporting scope data set<br />
Parameter –<br />
Data quality value type Real, percentage, ratio (example: 0,0189 ; 98,11% ; 11:582)<br />
Data quality value structure –<br />
Source reference –<br />
Example Potential data sources can be focus on a wider scope than the<br />
geographical one or the real geo-referenced entities are not tested.<br />
These elements should be avoided.