01.01.2014 Views

Download - GRaBS

Download - GRaBS

Download - GRaBS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

De-carbonisation, as the science suggests should<br />

be happening as a matter of urgency, is not<br />

apparent. Indeed, one study found that the rate of<br />

growth in carbon dioxide emissions between 2000<br />

and 2007 was four times that experienced during<br />

the 1990s. 9 As a result of this situation, research by<br />

Anderson and Bows 10 suggests that even ‘an<br />

optimistic interpretation of the current framing of<br />

climate change’ leads to a scenario associated with<br />

GHG concentrations equating to around a 3.5°C<br />

global mean temperature rise by the end of this<br />

century. Stafford Smith et al. 11 concur with this<br />

analysis, noting that ‘With weakening prospects of<br />

prompt mitigation, it is increasingly likely that the<br />

world will experience 4°C and more of global<br />

warming.’<br />

We are left with a situation where climate change<br />

impacts are being experienced more quickly and<br />

intensely than predicted, the thresholds for<br />

significant impacts relative to temperature increases<br />

are being revised downwards, the non-linear<br />

complexity of the climate system is increasingly<br />

being acknowledged, and projections for future<br />

changes in the climate are being ratcheted upwards<br />

as a consequence of a lack of action by policymakers<br />

and resulting rapid carbonisation. These<br />

‘The severe heatwave of 2003<br />

may have resulted in 35,000<br />

excess deaths in Europe,<br />

especially among the<br />

elderly, but this extreme<br />

event is not untypical of<br />

conditions projected by<br />

climate change models for<br />

later in the 21st century’<br />

factors encapsulate the adaptation imperative. The<br />

discussion now turns to the consideration of<br />

adaptation planning and response development,<br />

with a focus on the built environment – and with<br />

particular reference to the role of green and blue<br />

infrastructure as a means of moderating risks<br />

associated with a changing climate.<br />

Climate change impacts in the built environment<br />

A key step in developing an adaptation response<br />

in policy and practice is to understand the likely<br />

interaction between climate change and the system<br />

in question. In broad terms, the IPCC has<br />

concluded 12 that Europe is most sensitive to:<br />

● extreme seasons, in particular exceptionally hot<br />

and dry summers and mild winters;<br />

● short-duration events such as wind-storms and<br />

heavy rains; and<br />

● slow, long-term changes in climate which will put<br />

particular pressures on coastal areas, for example<br />

sea level rise.<br />

The impacts from these changes will be keenly<br />

felt in the built environment, for it is here that<br />

people and property are most concentrated. For<br />

example, the climate change impacts identified as<br />

of primary interest by the <strong>GRaBS</strong> partners, listed by<br />

frequency of response, were high temperature (10),<br />

flood risk (8), water resources and quality (5),<br />

ground conditions (3), and fire risk (1).<br />

It needs to be emphasised that natural processes<br />

such as energy exchange and the water cycle<br />

continue to operate in the urban environment, but<br />

here they are modified and in some respects<br />

amplified. In particular, the extent of vegetation<br />

cover is reduced by urbanisation, and with it the<br />

potential for evaporative cooling from plant surfaces.<br />

Conversely, the built environment has a high<br />

thermal capacity so that heat conductance and<br />

storage increases. These and other factors, such as<br />

multiple reflectance within street canyons,<br />

contribute to a pronounced urban heat island,<br />

especially at night, when temperatures may be<br />

significantly higher than in the surrounding<br />

countryside. In addition to energy input from solar<br />

radiation, heat input from human sources (transport,<br />

buildings and even human metabolism) also<br />

contributes to the heat island effect, especially in<br />

winter. Climate change strengthens the urban heat<br />

island and increases the risk of heat stress among<br />

vulnerable populations. The severe heatwave of<br />

2003 may have resulted in 35,000 excess deaths in<br />

Europe, especially among the elderly, but this<br />

extreme event is not untypical of conditions<br />

projected by climate change models for later in the<br />

21st century. 13<br />

Another consequence of urbanisation is surface<br />

sealing, which reduces infiltration of rain water and<br />

increases surface run-off. As the climate warms,<br />

more evaporation occurs from the oceans and wet<br />

surfaces, and the atmosphere is able to hold more<br />

of that water – around 7% for each 1°C centigrade<br />

rise in global temperature. One consequence is<br />

greater rainfall intensity, which may already be<br />

contributing to increased surface water flooding in<br />

Europe. Urbanisation interacts with climate change<br />

to increase this risk. For example, modelling work in<br />

Greater Manchester suggests that a high-intensity<br />

rainfall event which may bring 56% more rainfall in<br />

the 2080s will result in 82% more run-off (from the<br />

current urban form). 14<br />

These and other potential climate change impacts<br />

in the urban environment – such as the risk of<br />

riverine flooding, tidal inundation, problems of<br />

ground stability and water shortage – are beginning<br />

254 Town & Country Planning June 2011 : <strong>GRaBS</strong> Project – INTERREG IVC; ERDF-funded

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!